Christianity Rules

Why Do People…? It can seem very confusing why people are bringing about the demise of the things they themselves like and on which they depend.  Why do Starmer, Macron, et al. bring in immigrants over their country's objections even though those immigrants will make/produce populations that not only will stop voting for them but seize their assets and impose the jizya  on them (or maybe do much worse) and so forth?  Popular attempts at explanation have been Satan and Pathological Altruism, which form a dumb and dumber style relationship much like the rest of Jesusianism and Bangism.  E.g. Satan is a stupid fantasy, but much  less stupid than believing selfish genes developed the favored trait of "harms self."  Like the evolution debate , Jesusian creationism is very stupid, but beats by a huge amount the "randomness just so happened to turn out lifeforms perfectly suited for Earth's environment" nonsense with which Bangism counters Jesusianism.  ...

Juxtapose the imposition of the fictional character James Bond upon England with the current immivasion of England.   The egotistical non-sensibilities parodied in the Austin Powers series are indicative of the way that flattery and self-glorification leads to despair.  For example, consider the way that grooming gangs of older Pakistani men <redacted> young UK girls, and the way that immigrants are given nice hotel rooms and banquets funded by the UK workingman, alongside the implication that the descendants of the Anglo-Saxon employ their offshoot of German in such a charming way that attractive women want to sleep with the speaker.  It seems a nice flattery at first, but the true horror is now revealed.   As Keir Starmer jails for years people who say on the internet that street prayer sucks, does it provide a nice balm that for a few decades before pretty women were supposed to drop their panties because they so loved that accent? ...

Forgetting Ages Past Do you care about a woman getting violated and killed?  What if it happened years ago?  If the people who did that were members of Club Zagglequorf, and after a few years you proudly showed the logo of being a member of Club Zagglequorf (wearing the golden Z necklace to show everyone where you stand) is that a good thing?   Think of someone who was wronged around the time of today, and if they were wronged by an anti-matter agenda (current form, remember, is "free" of matter--liberal).  How obscene would you feel it if years from now clueless people--people who were actually good people, but were just genuinely ignorant--were supporting the very thing that'd done such badness?   Cereal Preference The Christian kind of absurdity—contemplating what fictional people would have thought had they been nonfictional—can be seen in people arguing about Christ’s preferences.    S.R. did not actually  exist;  He was a face...

“Survival of the fittest” implies that the aristocrats (who popularly style themselves as the capitalist rich; some of them Marx’ bourgeoise, and a small portion of them genuinely skilled or lucky capitalists) earned their place by the only possible method, when in fact much of the ownership of capital was established before  the pretension that free markets (capitalism) had begun.   The “Big Bang,” or the story of a creation that utterly began things, accordingly implies that nothing unfair could have been there before.   The bad people—thieves—who established a game board really, really want no one to investigate the possibility that the game is loaded in that way; was rigged since people began officially playing it.   (“Survival of the fittest,” and the story of evolution by random mutation, are very popular in societies dominated by, and decreed to be the correct way of thinking by, today’s wealthy and powerful humans.   It seems secular, but is in fact a ve...

The quandary over the Conservative Party in the UK (to which they might well add the letter U because they like that, e.g. flavour, labour, and favour) is that Gordon Brown allowed massive immigration after he was elected PM for promises to end immigration, which promises he promptly broke.  Britain exited the EU for that reason (Brexit).  Still, the people didn't get what they wanted.   Why?  It's the same old question of decay .  People trying to explain this behavior while preserving their unspoken, unknown assumption that a person's sense of self is generated throughout decades of old brain cells dying and being replaced by new ones think it is irrational.  As a result, you get stupid impossible stories, such as that an invisible rabbi in the sky had total power, made everything, but also made this entity against him, doing things SR made him to do and knowing he would do and if He can move that rock than He can't make a rock so big so <error s...

Co-Opt There are many nice, good, completely life-affirming and -appreciating behaviors which Europeoids manifest.  Why Legacy Christianity is such an effective ideological weapon is that it tricked many Europeoids into thinking that all of that nice, good, completely life-affirming and -appreciating behavior is associated with S.R. (Sky Rabbi, remember?  Jesus).  Thereby, people can be led to think that any demeaning of S.R. is evil; is actually demeaning of all that nice, good, completely life-affirming and -appreciating behavior!   The consequences of this mistake are quite terrible.  Europeoids might do something like create a civilization with trial by jury, nice streets, and minimal restrictions on female clothing, and then, flush with the beliefs of a Middle Eastern man's superiority, allow into that society such men of the type who decide legal cases by ethnicity, habitually discard unwanted items in the street, and believe that any female showing c...