Environmental Correspondence

There once was a man called Jesus.  He liked you so much that He kicked your ass forever if you didn’t like Him back.  If you said, “Sorry I like chicks not dudes” then He would say “Die pagan scum!” and kill you (He would kill you in a holy way so it was okay).  This kind of liking of you--which can be called loving if you want to be loved by a man--was so great there was a whole book about it.  Everyone should read that book while special men in special clothes who never get married touch the little boys' stu--anyway, what happened was so good because—oh; Ists.  Right.  Going on:  

Think of apoptosis.  Cells are built to die after a certain time.  This seems incredibly morbid and sad, and/or an impossible way to win a contest of survival, but in fact, it is a way of ensuring that the raw material used by that cell cycles through the environment, and is thereby available for other things to use.  

Apoptosis.  Look it up so that you believe in it and don't think we are making up things (here's the CIA's trusted place if you want).  People have known it happens for a long time, and it is quite understandable that they shy away from thinking about how organizations of humans (societies) might do the same thing.  

When you see people acting ridiculously self-destructive and socially suicidal now, that is a larger form of apoptosis.  Those people don't know that; they believe they are doing a good thing that will help them survive and do better.  See how things that seem utterly nonsensical are in fact completely simple and explicable when you think of them as a part of environmental cycling?  You could feel the same type of confusion if you were some cell watching another cell do self-destructive things.  "Why is it acting like that?  Doesn't it know it will die if it keeps that up?"  Yes, women who would not enjoy being gang-raped by Arabs (or anyone else even—they are 100% anti-gang rape when asked) advocate for pro-refugee policy.  Belligerent White teenagers explain that White people should all vanish, and it just seems to be ignorance, but they really are behaving like that because the environment needs to cycle.  The delusion that they are independent thinkers is your delusion as well as theirs.  

Same thing with modern Jesusians.  Otherwise very intelligent people can say they believe in an invisible sky friend who wants them to behave a certain way because the things they think are not--as narcissistic fantasy has it--self-generated, but environmentally generated.  (Some of us have a personal hobby of arguing with Jesusians, but it's just a time-eater; they literally cannot want there to not be such a sky friend.  It is like having as a hobby running around with a bucket trying to catch raindrops just before a rain.)  

Cells are programmed to die, which characteristic they would obviously never have if life had evolved because of a struggle where the most fit survived.  “Guaranteed auto-death” is the complete opposite of a trait that would win in such a contest.  Apoptosis would be long gone if that had happened, you never would have heard of it, yet apoptosis is exceedingly common (everything known has it).  “Survival of the fittest” is, over the short term (think <100 years), true and effective, but over the longer term, conceiving of life as being like that is completely missing the point.  It is a fantasy of independence; of material severance; of soteriology.  The idea that you would/should/could not be part of this process--that you hope to be "saved" from matter--is Christian.  Christ!  Savior-ity!  That's why it is completely right and apt to say Jesusian Christianity and Bangist Christianity--those things are about separating living things from matter, whether or not a Jesus is involved.  Apoptosis shows that the gene is not selfish.  An invisible rabbi does not live in the sky making rules about you and the way your life should be, which many people now have figured out (though not all somehow), but neither is the gene selfish.  It is made expressly to die.  

Just like carbon-dating fossils proves that the Bible/traditional Christianity (Jesusianism) is full of it, apoptosis proves that popular modern stories of how biology works are full of it.  The teachers/professors/researchers/etc. of today get called very smart and informed for subscribing to this nonsense.  The missing links in their system can be spoken of by Jesusians, but neither side is correct even though both can feel really justified because the other side says stupid things.  

Why is the gene made expressly to die?  Because when the genes making up bodies and minds die, it forces those bodies and minds also to die.  “Survival of the fittest” may be true, but may apply to “Collectives of Stars” not “individual humans on Earth,” in which case apoptosis makes sense.  

The way biology is conventionally taught and understood now is severely flawed.  Environmental correspondence--the brain being attached to the soul, not generating it, and individual lifeforms being part of their environment--is so verboten it is not even considered.  Narcissistic fantasies of the brain-generated soul (self-awareness; mind; sense of self) are the drugs of the day, just like sicko repressed-homo fantasies about S.R. were that before.  

(Again, traditional Christianity [Jesusianism] has been strongly linked with anti-homosexuality, but you should remember that it has been official policy of many Christian churches to cover up, reassign, etc. homo pedophiles for centuries.  It wasn't just a few bad apples, but that the churches themselves--and of course the Church--were officially administratively covering it up.  For centuries--it wasn't an aberration.  Those terrible sicko things were not a flaw but a design.  Christianity started out in Europe as a social affirmation movement for gay pedos [that's why giving them a respected place, such as the priesthood, was an integral part of every peace conference].  All the wars and the victory of Christianity should be considered in the light of how likely homos are to betray their own societies if someone let them do that to little boys.    

It is very understandable that there has been a longstanding conflict between vocational and bullshit we mean liberal art education, because that was initially the attempt of parents to keep their kids from getting abused by pedo priests and the pedos countering that they were teaching those kids really important things even if those things didn't seem to apply to the real world.  I.e. the pedos sexually abused kids in-between teaching a little Latin and about the life of S.R., while the kids' parents preferred teaching farming and having there be zero sexual abuse.  Pompous attitudes about the purported wisdom of learning imaginary BS we mean religiosity versus real learning, and the eerie pairing with non-life-making orgasmic behavior, can still be seen.  Have you noticed how trans issues pair with "liberal" things?  The passionate, seemingly nonsensical defense of the Department of Education is this--people passionately defending the great quantities of unarguable waste of a centralized bureaucracy is this.)  

Incorrect fantasies are popular in the Christian Era.  Just like really narcissistic fools who thought they were so smart because they knew how Jesus had made man on the sixth day (maybe it took him 6000 years; they occasionally killed a few thousand people to work that out for a while), narcissistic fools today teach that individual components of the genetic code are selfish, disconnected from their environment.  Just like for a long time when biology was taught alongside the Bible, and Jesusian Christianity was dominant, a "biology" that taught that everything alive (every bit of biology) had been created in six days with one rest day, the idea that you should believe things based on embraced non-evidentiary thinking (also called stupidity or faith) rather than on evidence ruined the science--made it something else.  The same thing happens now.  People think things are different now, that their science is based on evidence, but the popular stories that exist now are still based on faith, not on evidence.  Christianity still survives, and because the new version allows that Jesus never existed, people think that things are different.  They are not.  In every previous era of humanity, people thought that things were modern and great, much better than things were in the past.  Of course people think that same thing now.  You are being tricked if you think that the people now are right that things are different.  

Apoptosis utterly disproves that life exists because it was better at living than other life, and that life evolved due to the best traits randomly appearing and then being selected.  Yet, the narrative that those who survived were independent of their environment was so popular, like narratives of sky daddies who love you, that it persisted.  

How can this be, then?  How can reality not have been created by a Sky Rabbi or a Selfish Gene?  Because reality is environmentally correspondent.  Environmental correspondence is the missing component.  People have been tricked into believing that some version of a Sky Daddy (Jesus, Allah, etc.) created everything, or that some principle of randomness (personified for simplicity as Lord Randomus) did so.  Like both sides of a false dichotomy used to trick people—which false dichotomies these deceptions are—either side is incorrect; is part of the trick.  

Each “side” of the false dichotomy can say that it is definitely true by pointing to the stupidities of the other side.  However, neither side is right.  Neither side is true.  It is a clear manifestation of intelligence to discern any given stupidity from the other side of the false dichotomy.  However, it is a clear manifestation of un-intelligence to say that any given stupidity from the other side of the false dichotomy means that your opposition to that is at all relevant.  It is massively stupid to say that one believes that a first century S.R. or a seventh century pedophiliac Sky Daddy of another type should govern everything in the world.  Saying that people who say that either of these things are great and should control the world are stupid and wrong is very easy.  However, proving also that either of those things is true is impossible.  That is why the concept of “faith” has been so venerated.  

In modern times, educated people are encouraged to believe that Lord Randomus is great (remember that “Lord Randomus” is just a way of referring to the notion that everything happened randomly).  It is massively stupid to say that one believes that everything happened randomly.  Yet, it has been many times done.  

Even though apoptosis is known, even though infant leukemia is known, people have maintained their faith in selfish genes or an omnipotent god.  Those two falsities are powerful religions.  They are but facets of a single thing.  This thing is Christianity.  

It is still the Christian Era.  This is not true because of why people say it is, which is just because of history having an impact on post-Christian Earthling chronology now as C.E., but is appropriate because it is still the Christian era.  Christianity rules.