Why the West Needs Islam
The History of Europe
...See any problems, there? Is anything wrong with the story told by that text? What we know about the pre-Christian Europeans--what we "know" about the "pagans"--is similarly accurate. Just like we know about what made the Twin Towers fall, we know what the pagans knew and how they behaved--European culture and ways before the Christian invasion are portrayed incorrectly by the descendants of the conquerors, who are relying on the sources given by the conquerors. I.e. the victors wrote history. Some Christian who oversaw the massacre of villages, the righteous rape and blessing of good Christian marriage upon females, etc., left behind primary sources for people to consider over a millennia later about how the warlike Gauls didn't know the peace ofal John, Ibn Scott, The History of Europe (Oxford: University of Oxford Press, 3132), 47-48.
...And having cast aside Allah, Europe was dying. Its people called out for Islam, but it took many years for that reunification.
You see, consider the three fundamental pillars of Western Society. The first is the legacy of Greco-Roman Contact with the Persian and Arab nations, pre-Prophet peace be upon him. Second is the European Nations, in which the disseminated philosophy of the pre-Prophet peace be upon him permitted the Muslimic Diaspora to survive the hardship of separation. The third is Islam, the blessed hope of reunification with Allah.
Europe did welcome into its embrace the Moors, who for too short a term of centuries brought the light of Allah to some Europeans, the Spanish. Infidel elements devoted to Satan then subverted this gift, wishing to force Europeans to be enslaved to the earlier pagan demons who had long ruled that continent before the salvation of Islam. The stewardship of the Moors lasted for almost 8 centuries, during which many seeds of technological advancement were sown.
After that, a great darkness reigned over Europe as demons separated Allah's people from Allah's Word. Many important inventions, such as the telephone, aeroplane, and motorcar fled Europe too, being made in America. There, many men who were "deists" (a cowardly form of rejection not only of the Prophet peace be upon him but of the subsidiary prophet Christ), or the vulgar pretension of being a technical follower of Christ while disavowing that Allah had granted him supernatural powers [such as The Jefferson Bible], which allowed later infidels to claim they were Christian even though they were not at all.
At last, in the 21st century AD, the people of Europe begged to be reunited with Allah, and His children began coming together. Their reunification brought them the light of the Prophet peace be upon him.
Even further scientific proof of the goodness of Allah can be found in the way that then, the people of the European diaspora, once blessed by Allah, were able to invent the mattor and vee, coming to know the principles of reorganizing matter on an atomic level and causing stable elevation and travel via electromagnetism. Indeed, only a fool would deny the great benefits love for Allah has brought the people whose yearning to be Muslims led to...
No, though. The source of those good things is Europeoid genetics, not whatever with they were inflicted when they happened to do something you like.
Say a cancer patient wins the lottery. Does cancer lead to picking the right numbers?
Say some liberal kid gets a great job. Does believing in the equal ability of all to achieve the same scores on standardized tests lead to great jobs?
Say a Lutheran tries to commit suicide by jumping off a building, then somehow falls through some huge balloons that were just being set up and after that tumult meets some hot woman who likes him. Does it mean that Methyterians are doomed to always get sore toes (her father, who hates him, is Methyterian and has sore toes)? Does jumping off a building lead to happy marriages?
No! The example is someone doing something good while managing to live despite a bad thing happening. That does not mean that the thing being discussed is the cause of the good thing. The cancer patient who won the lottery got lucky. It wasn't related to cancer. The liberal kid who got the great job got it because the big person at that place knew his dad once. It wasn't related to the kid's politics. The suicidal guy was just a gift to that woman, falling out of the sky as he did, because she'd been getting out of this bad relationship where the guy was so obsessed with pleasing his mom that it ruined so many things and whenever she tried to talk to him he just put on sports and--etc.
Benefits of Cancer
Because Beethovio got cancer, he was often unable to sleep. Pacing about the house in a frenzy, sitting alone for hours at a time at night wracked with pain, he was able to write his many symphonies. Therefore, it is clear from all evidence that tumors cause a great benefit to musical ability.
True? No! Beethovio had cancer at the time he wrote those symphonies, and wouldn't have had the free time at nights to do that if not for the cancer, yes. However, if he hadn't had the cancer at all, he would've composed not merely the five great masterpieces for which he is known, but the 15 great masterpieces for which he would've instead been known. Saying that cancer causes composition is like saying that because Beethivio saw a butterfly that one day and was inspired to write his famous Duel of the Flutes based on how that butterfly fluttered means that butterflies cause musical breakthroughs.
If Europe had not been infected with Jesusianism, it would have kept its former 0% immigration policy. If you think that is bad because you are living in a developed Christian society that taught you diversity is strength, then you are behaving in the furtherance of decay. The society will further senesce, then die, then there'll be a new one, etc. What you tell yourself about why you think/feel/behave is window dressing. The same if you realize that death is coming and think that adolescence is surely the way to avoid senescence. No; of course not. It is an earlier stage in the life cycle, in which death is further away, but it is part of the very same process that leads to death (and then birth, growth, maturity, aging, death, birth, growth, etc. If you don't like part of that process, and think, "Oh, it was so great when I was a teenager! My back didn't hurt and the sex was so much better!" you are just dreaming. It's like fantasizing that the part of the roller coaster where you go up is way better and thus entirely separate from the "descending swiftly" part.
It is sad that many Europeoids have been deceived by Jesusianism, but it is also sad that many Europeoids have been deceived by liberalism. Thinking that you are saved or freed from the life cycle often (but not always!) leads to bad behavior. It is easy to see liberals acting foolishly now as Europe faces Torah 3.0, but it is very hard for people to conceive of how many years ago, when Europe was falling to Torah 2.0, that type of person was winning. Not only winning, but winning so thoroughly that over a thousand years later, that person's intellectual descendants (and probably that person's blood descendants too) would think that belief in and adherence to Torah 2.0 would save them. The victory of the Middle East is there well-expressed: the way that all of European philosophy, thought, achievement, and expression then became Christian.
Resistance
Those Europeoids who tried to resist the takeover of Europe by the Middle East were killed. The very many wartime deaths when Christianity started gaining prominence were called by the victors' history Christian disagreements about how best to worship a rabbi of the southern desert people. In that vein, Middle Eastern terrorists crashed planes into buildings and the jet fuel burned so hot it made steel frames go down.
Even now, the invasions of different places in Europe was not a comparatively minor thing, but a major, very big thing. The death toll of 9/11 was actually exceeded by the Massacre of Verden, where in CE772 Charlemagne murdered over 4500 people for not getting baptized. When Torah 3.0 Islamaniacs murder infidels in some foul way, it is foul, but it is not a new thing for Europeoids to be murdered for not following a Middle Eastern religion.
Deep Europeans today who think and say they are traditionalists because they're Christians who love S.R. and feel all good people need to be ruled by The LORD are doing the exact opposite of what they want to do. In the same way that such people could view it as an obscene falsity if Englishmen in CE3200 were wanting to worship Allah like their forefathers who'd founded England, it is wrong when Westerners today think that their civilization was founded by men who loved and pledged themselves to a Middle Eastern rabbi.
Comments
Post a Comment