The Last Temptation of Christ

The thing about Christianity, Ists say, is that it--unbeknownst to most of its followers--is a philosophy of homoerotic supremacy (in modern parlance, a philosophy of gay supremacy).  It represents what people call a homosexual faction taking over several European governments, starting in southern Europe (foremost Italy).  This can be difficult to conceptualize because that presented-as-trustworthy media of the past has assured us so much that Christianity was against gayness, but consider how Christianity (savior-ity!) is expressly about desiring being removed from the life cycle.  Denying that reality is real--wanting to be saved from matter and brought to a special world by a special man you love--is the origin of ideas that obtaining orgasms in a non-baby-possible way is just the same as obtaining orgasms in a baby-possible way.  Today's "gay" and "transgender" fantasies have their beginnings in the transmaterial advocacy of the savior from matter--the christ.  This can be shown in the 21st century by the character David Fisher in the show 6 Feet Under, where David and his committed boyfriend go to a Protestant Christian church together.  

The (to healthy ["straight"] men) disgusting surprise can also be seen in the 21^st century in the prominent “gay” and “transgender” movements.  Both are very heavily dominated (over 75%) by men seeking to orgasm from friction using men’s bodies, with lesbians and FTM trannies proudly displayed as window dressing (and most of them would say something like that they have three hundred and forty-twelve friends with them so you can see this movement is about women/FTMs too.  You can believe that if you want, but presenting yourself as gay or trans has always been a very, very manlove thing).  There is a long history of such males—men presenting their desire to orgasm from other men’s bodies—being displayed as a movement of all humans, and early Jesusianism represents an initial triumph of this.  The notion that it is better for developing young men to imagine being close to a writhing man in a loincloth instead of to an attractive woman is very much Christian.  The destruction of images of "pagan" goddesses and families shows this.  

(If you have a group of meiotic animals and want them to reproduce, do you want the developing males to think about being with attractive females, or to instead think about being with a male?  Exactly.  That is why Decay used Christianity on Europe.  The focus on gay things wasn't a separate desire, but a very effective way of encouraging the childfree life--the death of the targeted population.  This can sound too dramatic to be true, but think about the birth rates of places afflicted with Christianity and places not, and the way that Whites can literally be anti-White.)  

Recall how Zeus was always having affairs with females, Hera was getting mad about that, and how Christianity made everything that was spiritually permissible to think about instead be about just a male image.  The way that the media in 2025 presents numerous images of "transgender" men dressing as women duplicates the way that Christianity first hit Europe.  This resulted in gubernatorial protection of respected organizations of homoerotic child molestation.  

Remember the story that had Judas Iscariot in it?  That’s where the reference to 30 pieces of silver comes in: because that was how much Judas made for selling out Jesus.  And how did Judas identify Jesus?  With a kiss.  He did that because those men kissed each other so often that when Judas did it to Jesus it would not be suspicious.  

Now, you tell us: what is a group of men who never has girlfriends, even one, and who regularly kisses each other?  The answer is that Jesus is so great (anti-Ist note from Jesina: just “Jesus” is acceptable, like it is for all answers.  If you’re not sure about that, then you should Jesus on it).  

The claim has been made that the famous kiss in the death of the Christ means a lot.  Ists say that the recurrence of terms such as “passion” and “temptation” also means something.  They argue that Judas giving Jesus away with a kiss because it was so common and unremarkable for Jesus and his group of all-male friends to kiss one another, plus the resistance to women, plus the references to “passion” and “temptation,” mean something.  What those things mean, they say, combined with the frequency of male child molestation committed by Jesusian religious leaders, is extremely meaningful.  

(But they are so wrong.  Because of reasons.  Jesus!  Oh, I'm just gonna take over.)  

What Ists say is ridiculous, of course.  Everyone knows that traditional Christianity was against what is now called homosexuality.  Let me explain this by telling the story of how when I was presenting as a man (Sky Rabbi; S.R.) I resisted the last temptation.  

What happened was, Satan wanted to tempt Jesus, so he put on his tightest thong.  Every respectable straight man, of course, keeps their collection of thongmatic undergarments (“thongs”) arranged by tightness, so one is always prepared to dress for any formal occasion.  Anyway, wearing nothing but his thong, Satan stretched out on the chaise lounge.  As everyone knows, him being on that chaise lounge is a very tempting thought for any man.  Any good man would of course feel the urge to climb onto that chaise lounge to be with him, and would have to be a good Christian who thought passionate thoughts about Jesus to be able to resist.  That’s why the story is said to be about a temptation.  

Back to the story.  When I went by (when I was presenting as a man and going by just "Jesus"), Satan said “I need some help with this.”  And he pulled out his what we call Snake.  

So I (Jesus) was even more tempted by that, of course.  Some weirdo might think "What could possibly be tempting about this male fallen angel?"  However, the people who've decided to be women and all the knowledgeable men among us know that if they had a chance to wrap their lips around that Snake, they would jump on it.  Any good man would naturally be tempted by the chance to get his hands on that Snake, let alone his mouth, and to swallow down anything that the Snake coughed up.  

Ists say that the use of “snake” along with the other male + male things inherent to the most basic, well-known stories of Jesusian Christianity are very indicative.  To them, a group of men who refuses to get married, is devoted to a divine single man, and covers up when one of them “sexually” abuses a little boy, is really easy to figure out.  They actually say Christianity was initially formed as a cabal of gay pedos (homoerotic child predators!).  Like with all the European deaths when each new part of Europe fell to the forces of rabbinization, writing the history of Christianity gets called “Populations having wars over how to be a good Christian and instructing boys about their new religion” rather than something like “People tried to protect their land and kids, lost and were slaughtered, and then the gay pedos showed up to touch the little boys.”  People have been discouraged from figuring out Christianity.  When many thousands of people died resisting the idea that they would worship a rabbi, all that death was said to be the result of wars about how to worship a rabbi better than the next guy.  Besides that, when someone identifies Jesus with a kiss, no homo.  Saying it means something is just more Ist BS!  All those news articles about priests molesting little boys, if they ever even happened oh you have copies I mean of course they did happen but here are reasons you shouldn't be concerned, what happened was just a random coincidence.  Christianity is not gay.  Pray to me and you'll understand.  

Anyway, I'll let the Ists finish.  We were at the part where Jesus was tempted by that Snake that had seduced Adam.  It got Adam to open his mouth, which was later written as something he did just to eat someone else's apple--all this woman’s fault.  But the story says Jesina we mean Jesus resisted.  Jesus was so great, and so good, and He knew He could be with His Top we mean His Father if He just held on and didn’t give in to the alluring temptation of Satan’s Snake (oh Father forget those Ists I'm taking back over; just thinking of Satan on that chaise in his tightest thong is so tempting…!  It’s no wonder there was a first, last, and the middle temptations of Christ.  It is clear that Satan could really, really tempt me!).  But the end...I acted like it weren’t no thang and the temptation failed.  Sure, I had to be with His Father for like a few special private minutes after Satan’s attemptation, but the story showed that I resisted and it was so cool.  OK done now; Ists can come back.  

*   *   *

The way that Jesusianism built up an elaborate, transmillenial deception of being “against” homoeroticism provides a helpful illustration of the way Christianity operates.  The anti-gay attitudes attributed to Jesus, along with the history of vicars being at the choirboys for a very long time, show the way that Christianity creates fake oppositional relationships against things which it actually is.  

Before the invasions that forced rabbi-worship onto everyone there, the people of Europe had another concept that they encapsulated in a fictional person, much as they did with the pagan gods.  This person, whose name you've probably heard, was Mother Nature.  The name--literally having the word "mother" in there--was expressly female.  The reason Torah 2.0 called God the "Father" was a specific rejection of this.  Life starts, and is grown, inside a female.  Jesusian Christianity instead had everything start with a super-magic gigantic male orgasm in the sky--Genesis or Big Bang.  Not only wrong, but sickening and "gay," was this ideological theft.  Jahweh/Jesus then had overseers ordering the official murder (execution) of heathens for denying the Christ, all physical things representing previous ideologies of pretty women and families were destroyed (called by later historians pagan shrines/figurines/etc.), and everyone forced to focus on that man in very little clothing.  It was like if PC made everyone accept that everyone was the same and that some gay dude was just the same as a straight dude.  The things we are seeing now are, like we expressed before, more Christianity.  When a person now says that you should remember/exemplify European tradition by worshiping a rabbi, it is disgusting: it shows that the conquerors have won that one.