Mass-Murder of Children

Jahweh--Yahweh, Jehovah, or Jesus--is a terrible character.  Luckily the Bible is fiction, because if there were such a character of penultimate foulness/power as the biblical Father (S.R.; Jesus; God), that character would be so terribly evil and powerful that resisting him would be the only possible good action.  

Is This a Test?

Jesusians should consider that: if this existence is a test of quality.  If you follow the biblical Jesus, you support a child-murderer who is not even a teensy bit repentant but upholds that they all deserved it, and if not, you do not support that mass-child-murderer.  If an all powerful god wanted to see which creations had turned out good or not, which ones should be tossed into hell and which elevated to paradise, you can guess how the "do you support mass-child-murder?" figures into that.  Jesusians who say "Christ is King!" are telling God, "Child-murder is AOK with me!" proudly advertising that they're suitable for destruction/hell because they expressed that killing little kids is just fine.  Them believing that it is just fine to murder babies, that there were completely good reasons for murdering babies, is a great way to display their quality to a testing deity.  Ironic, that a bunch of people think they're doing the right thing because a character who describes murdering babies says He is good!  Are you fooled?  Should Jesus scrap you and look for someone else who doesn't think there is any possible excuse for murdering little kids?  

The personality split between the murderous Jahweh of the Old Testament and the calm, forgiving Jesus of the New Testament evinces the way that the cobbled-together Bible was created.  Many Christians want to just focus on the New Testament, but like a serial-child-killer who thinks he's turned over a new leaf (because he locked the basement door where he strangled all those kids), the things Jesus did in the OT are things that character did.  The murderous schizophrenia of Jesus before he locked the basement door includes unforgivable things.  Much as initial Jesusianism sold itself and recruited homoerotic men by making orgasmic sexual abuse of children forgivable rather than capital, the polite overlooking of what Jesus did BC is disgustingly wrong.  

Noah

Everyone knows the story of Noah, right?  Well, in the story, Jesus floods the entire Earth, killing everyone except Noah, Noah's family, and one of each of the two total sexes of every kind of animals (the female mammoth was trains without an eye; that's why there are no mammoths now.  Boy was that one mammoth pissed when all the other male animals had a girlfriend and his makeup was supposed to be ass-effing that other dude.  We explained it for a long time, got everyone to not be so transphobic, talked until that male realized buttsex was okay, and off they went.  That one mammoth acting like a woman we mean really being a woman did great stuff, like vocalizing appropriately, and we think everyone was fooled we mean saw the light that he we mean she REALLY HAD nerve endings in her butt.  Well, that problem is solved anyway since mammoths = gone.)  

The similarity between trains without an eye behavior and faith healing revivals, where everyone in the tent is supposed to act like the showman loves Jesus so much he can cure decades of decay of the spinal cord by special tapping and intense looks, should be noted.  The showmanship harkening to no evidence but "everyone else seems like they think so" is a suitable demonstration of how traditional Christianity used the church and liturgy to make people pretend they believed in nonsense.  Nice and reassuring feelings of togetherness can now be had without talk of S.R., but those feelings have been supplanted by the campaign rally and the rent-a-mob.  As legacy Christianity (Jesus-based) behaved, so now do liberal mobs respond.  People who remember the way things were--such as that there are two sexes--can be shocked at the craziness of people.  Yet, recognizing such behavior is (ironic, because it is often Jesusians now who perceive the illogicality) just more of the same.  People whose spouse and half the village were murdered by some "the rabbi will save us!" mob believing lies about some planned attack were similarly mystified by the behavior of those same people saying the rabbi existed and would save them.  When a White woman in 2025 demands that her tax dollars be used to give room and board to a rapist to move in across the street, it is completely Christian--she wants to be saved from matter, i.e. for reality and evidence to not be relevant.  The seeming insanity has happened before; Jesusians today passionately (sic; "passion" haha) say that the philosophy of their greatfathers' murderers should be followed.  

What is unspoken and generally unconsidered but built into the story of Noah and the flood is the mass-murder.  Jesus' vaunted love, forgiveness, and compassion operated such that he committed mass-child-murder.  Every infant on the planet was murdered, because some people in the Middle East had behaved in a way Jesus didn't like.  Holy crap.  Jesus is as evil as evil can be!  He drowns babies who are like a week old because someone on the other side of the planet pissed him off!  (There is surely no one who devalues human life that much, right?  Boy, it'd be crazy if anyone like that existed!)  

Many Whites think Jesus is forgiving and nice.  It is like being unable to mentally grapple with the immense complexity of the problem of 2+2.  The story says this person drowned infants because this group thousands of miles away pissed him off.  Wow, I wonder what a moral god thinks about whether a good person likes the killer or not.  What a mystery!  

Sodom/Gomorrah

Just like Noah's Ark, everyone knows the Sodom/Gomorrah story.  There were some sinners, so Jesus firebombed where they lived.  Easy to forget is how many infants lived there.  Two?  200?  Does it even matter?  If Jesus burned even one baby to death he is quite evil, and if Jesus burned two cities' worth, or drowned a whole planet's worth, wow Jesus is so evil.  

(Did Jesus murder only infants?  No, he also murdered toddlers and kids who were like 5.  OK, so maybe the 5-year-olds had guns--oh wait; it was old.  Fine, they had swords or spears or whatever, and they looked like they were trouble, so he killed them.  Er but he lived in the clouds and there was no way they could get up there to poke him.  But "He" loved these people across the street so He had to murder those kids.  "Well, did you murder those people across the street too?"  "Yes your honor, but...")  

Canaanites, Amalekites, Midianites

The jealous Jesus also ordered that the seven nations of Canaan be wiped out by his chosen people, and after that his chosen people should wipe out the Amalekites then the Midianites.  How many babies?  Well, as many as they had then.  Moses ordered that every Midianite be killed except the virgin girls; you can guess why he made that distinction.  

(The hero of the foundation of Islam and Christianity is a person who plans for the mass-rape of underage girls, and is a person who is the paladin of someone who thinks it is justified to murder a lot of babies.  It is no surprise that we have seen extremely bad things from traditional Abrahamic religions.)  

Measuring Evil

S.R. is so evil it goes far beyond the end of possibility that he is even half a hairsbreadth of a little bit of the good found between a microscopic cow's flies' toes.  Even if Jesus said he had "reasons" for killing all those kids, they weren't even remotely serious things--you don't kill people because their great grandpa ate your apple!  Killing babies over that makes it even worse.  Jesus is pure, undiluted evil.  Even if he turned this loaf of bread into servings of fish casserole for a jillion people, he is so dirty that the nice act doesn't even make him 0.001% OK.  

The exorbitant filth and murder ordered/directly perpetrated by the biblical God is so obvious that it beggars the imagination how the enemy of that character, who wanted to stop that character, could possibly be bad for doing so.  Yes, the Satan character has been said to be the idol of people who've done bad things (said by those people themselves), so that is an unhealthy phenomenon too, but that means Satan is also bad, not that Jesus the child-murderer is good.  Even if Jesus doesn't like partial-birth abortion, Jesus is still not at all good.  (Remember that Jesus planned out every single detail of every single abortion ever, then made things just to be that way--Jesus made every abortion ever happen, and every miscarriage, and every stillbirth, and every snack when some baby meets an unexpected bear when that baby's loving parents were just going to get the extra berries, etc.  Jesus is a monster.  "Free will," even if it fixed some things, has nothing at all to do with the bear deciding to sniff over there when the parents are getting berries to help mommy make milk.  It is no surprise that the murderer of children does lots of other bad things too.)  

Consider how modern events play into that.  If someone doesn't let the media oligarchies come into her or his country, fighter bombers get sent in to slaughter some number of civilians and topple that person's government.  That person gets called very bad, all the media companies parrot that, and even though the actual badness was done by someone else, the "Satan" gets blamed for it and the doers of the horrible things get called the good heroes who stopped bad things.  This pattern shows the way that history is told to emphasize to everyone how stupid and bad the pagans were before they were conquered by the much-more-advanced monotheist Christians.  If you have learned that today's corporate mainstream media does not often tell you the whole story or even correct bits of that story, the next step is considering that there were people/groups like that before, and accordingly revise your historical opinions.  Remember: they said that a man in the sky made all the stars in a big bang and all the people out of mud He found in Africa.  Stories like that are wrong.  

Traditional Christians should also think about whether their soul looks better if they think words to a man they think of who is a mass-child-murderer, or if they don't support such an idea.  Additionally, and potentially much more physically, if God is testing you, do you prefer to be loved by a male god or a female one?  With regards the anti-marriage clerisy who built a reputation for preying on male children, that has an easy answer, but any male Jesusian should ask himself if he wants to be embraced/loved by a divine man or not.