The Gift of Christianity

How much do you like fake stories?  If someone tells you a story for which there is no proof but he swears is real, do you completely fall for it?  What if that story is really popular?  So popular that it gets told for years and years like it was really a true story.  Do you then fall for it?  

The Gift of Jet Fuel That Burns Super-hot

Forcing Christianity upon a bunch of victims would have been very mean.  How likely is it that people in Europe were eager to start worshiping as an all powerful god an official wise man of a people not from Europe?  

There are two possibilities in such a situation.  In one possibility, people who had been formerly keeping anyone else from coming into their lands, which lands those people wanted to give to their children, so liked the idea of supporting stories about a foreign official wise man that--like the mainstream media carefully doesn't mention what Europeoids today really want, just relying on immigration and cultural changes being officially good--they were completely supporting the idea of a Middle Eastern religion taking over Europe.  According to that story, reverence for that story of said person no one had met but who was an official wise man of a group of people not from Europe grew naturally.  Under the other possibility, you have to ask yourself if it is possible that someone could tell such a gigantic mistruth that the adoption of that mistruth could become part of the official story of world history and change international politics for a long time in ways that killed many thousands of people.  

Day 098: "Oh, his eyes look like yours!  I'm so happy he's out!"  

Day 098: I have to protect them.  No matter what, I have to keep them safe.  

Day 123: "Yeah, me and my good friend here both heard them saying they were going to invade you.  It would be so unfortunate if you had to defend yourself from them and kill a lot of people, but you have to do it to protect those you love.  Your family, your kids--beautiful family by the way--has to be protected in order to punish those evil Catholic Spanish for blowing up the Maine I mean Saddam's W.M.D. I mean that evil over there; you have to protect your family.  You have to hurry up and kill them because they are planning to kill you."  

Day 456: "You have to administer all those people who lived through you defending yourself from those evil guys?  Well, so happens I've got some friends who know all about managing complicated stuff like that."  

Day: 789: "Yeah, I guess I could be in charge of the people there, as long as you give me all that farmland and hills and stuff.  God bless us all, every one!  I know that God has made this happen."  

See how Europeans started to worship an official wise man of a person not from Europe?  The official take on history, like the official story of jet fuel burning down steel-framed buildings, is very hard to believe.  Targets are supposed to believe that those people wanted to worship that foreign official wise man so much that they completely changed their lives, and started letting immigrants into Europe.  All the wars that happened then--all the death and the misery--are supposed to be because those Europeans killed people about little details of how to best worship that foreign official wise man.  The happening of those terrible things to your ancestors--if you are congenitally wealthy descended from many generations of nobles, there is that, but you probably aren't--is what you are supporting when you use your intellectual freedom now to say "Christ is King."  

Toxic

Giving the gift of Christianity was just like giving the gift of jet fuel that burns so hot it destroys steel.  

Once the places in Europe had fallen, either victims of unexplained attack or having been told they had to attack to defend themselves, Christianity was mandated for all the survivors.  That is still evident today, it still being called so great to worship Jesus the prince of peace when the places that subscribe to Christianity do horrible things.  That is how Europeans began worshiping a foreign "wise man"; that is what you are advocating, how you are disregarding your own kind's history--say just 38,000 years of your ancestors' history--and prioritizing about 1600 years of it by saying, "Christ is King!"  

Creating Jesus

The way that the character of Jesus was represented in churches for over 1000 yours is also indicative.  Besides it being "gay" to get rid of all renditions of women and families and replace them with renditions of an almost/actually naked man, the transmogrification of that character into a Europeoid-appearing one is demonstrative of the untruth built into changing European culture to that of the Middle East.  

The repression of "women's rights," astronomical observation (remember, Stonehenge showed the Celts were looking thousands of years before the Christian invasion), and biological inquiry into the different types of humans (repressing that was why Jesus had to be designed as promoting universalism) did great damage to Europe.  

The way that astronomical, biological, historical inquiry etc. are still repressed shows that it is still very much the Christian Era.  Popular stories are that everything began 10-20B years ago (all those galactic clusters Tully found would have each taken a lot longer than that to form, which means that OH WOW LOOK A BLUE CAR!).  In addition, also popular are stories that races are social constructs and Europeans after Constantine's conversion (that had nothing whatsoever to do with blackmail but was just because he found that story about the rabbi so compelling) liked stories about that rabbi so much they kept killing lots of people to make sure the survivors amongst that people liked that rabbi right.  (If you've read the Bible, you know how likely it was that someone read it and really wanted to worship Jesus as an omnipotent, invisible god.)  

The way that studying human biology and the solar system were prime targets of Christianity shows the things that Earthlings are very much not wanted to know.  Recall immense social pressure exerted to favor lesser-achieving groups of Earthlings, horrible conflicts performed for the same reason, and great amounts of resources devoted to not exploring to find places where humans could live but instead to cultivate--to upkeep and increase in number--Earthlings who do not possess the ability to maintain themselves and certainly to do more than that.  

Given the enduring popularity of Jesusianism and Bangism, such conclusions must first address whether or not the character of Jesus is real.  If Jesus is real, and if you support the mass-murder of children and being held tenderly by a loving man, then all of those horrible things should have happened, and we Earthlings should continue on in the same spirit.  Your union with that child-murdering man should be the situation which you most anticipate.  If, however, you think that women and men should be together instead of just men and men, and you don't think that killing a lot of little kids is good, then you don't want to support Christianity.  

You may have been raised by good people; have good grandparents or great grandparents, who did lots of nice things.  Those people may have been tricked into supporting Middle Eastern philosophy taking over European philosophy.  Even if that is true, are they better than your great great grandparents plus your great*6 grandparents, plus your great*7 grandparents, plus your great*11 grandparents, plus your great*24 grandparents, plus your great*37 grandparents, and so on?  Christianity is your chance to correct your far-relatives who were probably Christian, to vindicate many who lived under it, and to redeem however many thousands of them lived in Europe before that.  The Aryan invasions of India, and Indian peopling of Japan and China, combined with the genetically Whiter composition of people who run those places and those like them, make it very probable that if you read for fun--and all-but-certain if you are rich/successful/whatever--in Japan/China/etc., then you had such ancestors.  Don't toss their memory into the memory-hole of believing that Christianity entitles you to just ignore everyone before the rabbi-based invasion of Europe.  

Maybe you have affidavit and video going back to about 1600 years ago, and things were different then.  It could be all a metaphor, and you don't really want to be a or support MSM.  However, you know that your genes developed for way longer than about 1600 years, and you've heard of Stonehenge.  You can suspect that there is a reason that people with PhDs are discouraged from things like figuring out if there is any relationship between racial politics now and Cro Magnons in Europe having bigger brains compared to humanoids in Africa, which humanoids had sex with apes for lots longer and who have smaller brains and genetics for being more violent.  From there, you can see why S.R. is said to have made everyone universally; why S.R.'s story keeps mentioning universalism (the common-origins stories, like cosmigasm [Creation]; Adam & Eve; Noah's family, which imply that Islam belongs in Dublin because we're all from the same place).  S.R.-philosophy is an attack on European philosophy, and using your intellectual resources now (2025) to support rabbi-worship Saviorianity is discarding the memory of every relative you had since Cro Magnons were painting wall-art on European cave-walls 40K years ago.  

Your ability to see the way that TV shows now push the narrative that, "We're all the same," shows that you possess the intellectual faculty to consider the Bible in that light.  It is the same kind of thing.  The presumed dislike of older people who are Jesusian Christian, of now-dead people who were Jesusian Christian, to increasing levels of insanity, does not mean that the better beginning of the anti-difference killing flood was a good thing.  Implying that everyone came from the same place is the Bible.  If you know what they're doing when they make stories of a blonde having a happy sexual relationship with a Black, then you can see what the Bible really is--a manifesto of togetherness, implying that not seeing different things as different is good.  

(Think about what all those relatives of yours would've wanted.  Do you support rabbi-worship when your forebears fought hard, then died, in a battle to keep their family safe from these crazy people who were attacking them for no reason or who fought hard, then died, in an attack to keep their family safe from this village they'd been told was surely going to attack them?  Okay, maybe it wasn't that; maybe your great*whatever grandmother was the seven-year-old who recovered from being raped in the aftermath of that battle, went on to a long and happy life cooking for her husband [your great*whatever grandfather] and being so happy to dandle on her knee her grandkids [one of them your great*whatever grandwhatever].  She knew full well that she would never deny the Christ because she didn't want to get burned to death, but inside her head--in the only private space where she could never get discovered and hurt again--she hated those awful stories about the rabbi and all the pain it had done to not only her but lots of people she'd known over the years.  Do you want to honor what she went through by supporting that rabbi?  That maybe didn't happen, but the taking of Europe piece by piece, the very many Christian wars, had many ancillary horrors of which we'll never know.  If your ancestors were men who wanted to be cradled by a loving man and were OK with child-murder, and if you're fine with that, maybe you just have to do the math of let's say 2025 years of Jesus-worship versus let's say 38K years of non-Jesus-worship.  Whom do you want to honor--the group that supported MSM child-murder. or something else?)