The Goodness of Jesus
Christ is King
Jesus is so great. He really is. Before I record more of these stupid hateful Ists spouting their hatecrime garbage, I will say that the history of Jesus, better put the history of Christianity, is one of Christ coming closer and closer to man. It is so passionate when people, men especially, realize that they need more Christ in their lives. When they see beyond the deception of those horrible demons like Hera or those younger ones with all that "curve" and "shape" like Aphrodite and Athena, which curve and shape should belong to men anyway, I know that it is so good men instead focus on the writhing passion of Jesus in His True Loincloth and nothing else, or to make things all decent just lying on a bed listening to lots of little cherubs who are not little naked boys for some perv reason but just because and the rumors about vicars and choirboys are just RUMORS.
(The preponderance of cherubs in early Christian art, like that of non-marriage, non-coitus vows for the exclusively male priesthood, is another disgusting giveaway. Naked little boys playing harps, later sometimes rendered in some paintings by some artists as boys and girls, provide more filthy insight into what was wanted by the early promoters of Christianity: naked little boys attending [a] grown man/men [castrati]. The cherubs' depictions with harps gives a chilling insight into the early Church's acquisition of male slaves genitally mutilated by the priests so that those slaves could later perform for their meals. Similarly to the ghulam--the boy slaves forced to dance and sing for older Arab men--and the khaneeth--when the boys were supposed to, while they performed, dress provocatively, partially, or not at all--is another of the disgusting ways that Jesusianism was an imposition of Middle Eastern culture onto Europe. What those no-marriage priests were doing to their sexually mutilated boy slaves is generally not mentioned; those slaves are often just described as unfortunate orphans cared for by those giving priests, which boys had unanaesthesized operations so they could be better singers in the choir. Thinking that Christianity is your history as a Deep European isn't just a betrayal of your relatives who tried to stop the immivasion's beginning; it is also pro-pedophile.)
It is so evil that those women-demons try to make it so all the sexy young men of Christendom (er I mean better put all the people of Christendom) focus on those women instead of seeking the tender, loving embrace of Jesus Christ. To save you from having to get punished by Jesus' subordinate dude Satan for this bloke eating the apple S.R. liked, He let Himself lose all His other clothing and get His divine shirtless flesh put on the True Cross which I capitalize just because it had Jesus on it. Yeah, there was this unfortunate thing about it killing Him, but don’t focus on that, just focus on Jesus writhing in passion. Whenever I think about them teaching people not to like those stupid women but to instead like the amazing gaze of the recipient of the passion, good men are so filled with Christ! It is like He is right there over your shoulder, filling you with His divine Grace. Oh Jesus oh Jesus just thinking of Him back there filling…anyway, here goes with the Ist stuff.
If You Prefer to Be With a Man
Things to consider:
1) This really nice bloke saying S.R. is great does not mean you should really believe in and love/worship S.R.
2) These really bad people saying you should not believe in, nor love/worship S.R., does not mean you should really believe in and love/worship S.R.
3) This really nice bloke saying S.R. is a lie does not mean you should really believe in and love/worship Science.
4) These really bad people saying you should believe in, love, and worship S.R., does not mean you should love/worship Science.
All of those things have happened, and happened to a great extent, so that bad things are ignored while people are distracted by assuring the world they are good and smart because they say they believe or disbelieve in loving/hating S.R. There is a long list, ever expanding, of terrible things being done by expressly non-Christians, and another one of anecdotes about really nice Christians. There are! There are there are! But again, those things do not mean you should really believe in S.R.! It is just a trick like that of getting you to like low-quality food to starve you in a cage and then provide you with low-quality food. Kept in such a situation, you would eagerly eat that low-quality food, and only a fool would believe that it was something other than low-quality food given to caged things.
Think of the profusion of figures of art from the Bible or characters in Hollywood movies. They are the same thing: low-quality products provided to people starved of the ability to obtain what they would choose instead. The starving is done so the eager and vociferous consumption of the low-quality food can be presented as proof that people really liked the low-quality food.
Much of that is what Christianity accomplished: making it a mortal crime to tell stories about goddesses and gods (because that proved to early Jesusians that you were worshiping demons, and the fact that the god was always pursuing the happiness of hearth and home, thus the family, which only acquisition of a female could offer, rather than the sterile pleasure-only pursuit of another male, was in direct opposition to Jahweh's thousands of years of recounted "mysterious" sterility. The confusion evidenced now by men costumed as women that they can't find men to date them shows the antilife urge of mimicked relationships). Before the lies that there was this great rabbi up there, people could entertain themselves, pass on culture, teach lessons to children, etc., by telling “pagan” stories. But Christianity eliminated this. If you tried to express European culture, you got ritualistically murdered by people who were told they were so good for defending the truth of S.R. Much of the way people nowadays have to speak carefully about racial minorities at work is a continuation of this same thing. Political correctness is that: Christianity (savior-ianity) without the Jesus character. Ironically, Jesusianism has fallen victim to the monster it birthed, because its outdated universalism has become called the enemy of the new universalism. The effectiveness of Christianity at polluting the European culture of free speech and free inquiry was great.
People have tried to defend Christianity from those who try to take away yet more of the good things humans use to live well. Say social institutions that are good for (growing, obviously) children. That behavior seems to provide proof that Christianity is the locus of anti-nonsense resistance. But—and this will be painful to many prisoners—Christianity is itself the product of the jailers!
In the eternal absence of proof that there is an S.R., but with billions and billions of Earthlings doing stuff for hundreds and hundreds of years, resistance to “taking nice things away” will often show itself via the expression of passion for nice things presented by the captors.
The conquest of Europe. The Christianization of the Celtic tribes. What became called Italy. What became called France. What became called Germany. And on and on. The subsequent colonialism of parts of Africa and Asia. The use of western militaries to violently impose democracy on places in Africa, Asia, and yes, Europe that attempt to govern themselves differently, or even that are democratic but not voting the way universalists want.
The Gravity Problem
It is all the same thing. Maybe it doesn’t seem important when a N.A.T.O. fighter-bomber murders a three-year-old Arab girl. Except if that plane hadn’t done that, that girl’s great grandchild’s great grandchild would have made popular some really cool thing. Because of seeing her with it, everyone used that thing. That thing A) had nothing whatsoever to do with Jesus, and B) changed the life of someone who wouldn’t have otherwise followed the course of thought that led to him solving the Gravity Problem.
(What is the Gravity Problem? Well, see, think of when people were trying to flee the red giant phase of Sol not being able to make the spaceships go powerfully enough to escape the pull of the star getting way bigger than we thought it would made a difference. Like, the difference between “pulled into star, fiery crash, everyone dies” and “getting away.” So the great grandchild of this person who got away was the perfect woman to be with, she’d’ve never existed if etc.)
So in fact, being against the Jesus Wars (now the N.A.T.O. Wars) is really important.
Good Things
Many people have been deceived into associating man-love (rabbi-worship) with good things. Consider:
This one invisible rabbi approved of good things, therefore you should do good things.
On account of this one rabbi in the sky giving us His love, we did nice things. We should love this one rabbi in the sky to do more nice things.
The all powerful rabbi, who was REALLY nice, didn't like this bad thing, so you should never do that type of bad thing.
People who we have proof said they loved this one incredibly stupenderous rabbi did this great stuff, so we should obviously say we like that one incredibly stupenderous rabbi too in order to do great stuff.
The illusion has tricked many people who approve of nice/good things into thinking you can only have those nice/good things with S.R. However, that isn't true! Like a foul-hearted group sliding into a free society, noting that some people who get wealthy are then giving, then ruining that society and stopping all that generosity by making that society become non-free, S.R. has nothing whatsoever to do with the desired results. Take out the Middle Eastern subversion and return to the earlier roots. Consider:
This one invisible rabbi approved of good things, therefore you should do good things.
On account of this one rabbi in the sky giving us His love, we did nice things. We should love this one rabbi in the sky to do more nice things.
The all powerful rabbi, who was REALLY nice, didn't like this bad thing, so you should never do that type of bad thing.
...what do you get at the end of all that? A suitable moral code:
You should do good things. We did nice things. We should do more nice things. You should never do that type of bad thing.
That is how Toxic Christianity slid its pustulent self into Europe. By lying to get Europeans to fight/kill other Europeans, by meshing rabbi-worship with pre-existing good things, Christianity took Europe. Like the way that the modern UK/US armies have been turned to horrible ends, as though some mass-murdering nonsense has anything to do with whatever founding principles are then described, all the niceness, goodness, rationality, etc. that would have been there anyway was associated with S.R.
Good, decent, rational people have been in this way tricked into supporting the idea of Jesus, because they know that all those good things are good. As we've said, the beginning of the flood into the basement is better than the drowning part, but it is crazy to think that the first few drops on the basement stairs--the first sign that the toilet upstairs is leaking--is a good thing! That's what traditional Christianity was: the first few trickles of letting outsiders come into Europe, which is really good compared to a bunch of Muslims street-praying in London now, but the latter is a direct consequence of the former.
The former is Jesus. He is the embodied rationalization of the breaking of Europe. However, many good people have been deceived into thinking that being pro-good is thinking/speaking/acting like Jesus is the source. Like trains no eye people and other liberals, the vast majority of them are not pure evil even if they serve it; are immune from seeing things differently because their thoughts and feelings are to cycle the environment. Thus, they do things that will end their society so that a new one can grow, and whatever illusions they've told themselves about why they think whatever they think are irrelevant. When they have a nice movie night, some drinks, some snacks, some friends, or in another situation some orgasms, some feelings of contentment, etc., they can feel so rational in deciding to what to pay attention and what to ignore as just some nut spouting.
What is nice, what is good, is that goodness that Jesusians think they are advocating via advocating worship of/reverence for S.R. They are wrong in the sense that there is no S.R.; Jesus is a fictional character, and they are just more useful idiots doing things on Earth by supporting universalism while thinking they support rather the opposite. Yet, that passion for goodness is nice. Like smelling a bed of roses and appreciating the fragrance even though some evil landscaper sprayed those flowers with some scentless poison right before you showed up and those flowers are going to be wilting tomorrow and dead the day after, that appreciation for goodness is nice.
Comments
Post a Comment