Unification

Fantasies of the NWO (dark, lurid, or both)

One of the things that can be recognized when considering people is that a lot of people think unifying is good--very good.  The reason that people think the NWO (New World Order) is good is sometimes just that it would be much more efficient to skimanage everyone's money if everyone were a citizen of one country rather than many countries.  This is pure evil, and it plays a part--certainly at the highest levels--in the CFR, Fabians, etc.  However, even though there is a small percentage of completely evil controllers of such things--and although it is quite simple to identify "likes to steal; plans to steal more"--there is still the lack of understanding of why so many non-controllers behave that way.  The groups/individuals of the CFR/Fabians/Bilderberg/etc. are only able to be such a phenomenal evil because of so many, many lesser fools who think that what they see as unification is a good idea.  They are not going to be collecting taxes from a hypothetical world state; they are going to be paying them.  When the majority of people is dumbed down into worker bee-like creatures who are regularly robbed and stifled for life, that will be them.  

Because that kind of unification would cause the great majority of people to be nothing but worker bees, the analysis of such plot has suffered.  People have tried to focus on:

1) How very foul the intended collectors are; 

2) How very wicked the future society of unification (just call it NWO for simplicity) will be.  

Many dystopian novels have teased out these types of subjects, as well as very many more essays/movies/etc. warning about this or that bad politician/group/policy.  However, like trying to make a committed Jesusian realize how stupid it is to say you believe in an invisible sky-friend who made the world because he has total power, those do not work.  Various rich and powerful people dream of and enact plans for skimanaging more and more people (building an NWO), lessening the importance of borders, integrating economies, demeaning nationalism, and so forth.  People trying to resist the NWO think that exposure and education will help; as they fantasize, more people will realize what the hopeful skimanagers are plotting and doing, how terrible a future NWO will be, and so forth.  

Nope!  

Foreshadowing

The many "waste"-like thefts discovered in the U.S. by the Department of Government Efficiency, and its necessary combination with men who will shoot you dead if you do not pay taxes to be skimanaged, foreshadow the way the NWO is to work.  Having to labor to have things be from you extracted, making some people rich at the expense of very many others, is what the NWO is meant to be.  Viewing how that has happened, and how many of its victims seem to nonsensically and passionately insist that they be robbed and their robbers are very good, shows how the NWO would be.  People working hard from about 18 until dying on bad healthcare in their late 60s, so that Chelsea Clinton can not work in order to have a big mansion, is about exactly what is skimanaging.  In theory, people would hate that, and yet very many of them embrace it--insist upon it.  This makes no sense unless one considers that the brain generates thoughts as part of its environment, which needs to cycle.  Decay happens like rain falls.  

Why Some People Think Unity Should be Pursued

The reason that this happens can be best understood from the micro first.  How do atoms form?  By virtue of electrons orbiting a proton.  If that doesn't happen, nothing material can exist.  If one electron bounces about one proton, you get hydrogen.  If electrons never stick to one proton but just go about randomly, you get nothing.  That unification is a vital component of everything.  Ever met someone you liked?  They were made all of atoms, and without that unification, they never would have existed.  Hydrogen, helium, lithium, etc.  Every single atom, all the way up to everything that goes in a person.  

Now, imagine a cosmos where all of the atoms go about randomly and never combine.  No molecules; just a mess.  However, because those atoms combine with like-kind atoms, they produce molecules.  Same example: human beings, and all the stuff around here basically, are made entirely of molecules.  Unification is really important.  

Have we gotten that point?  Unification is very, very important.  Deep inside their bones (metaphorically; good grief), in the most fundamental portion of their psyche, people feel that unification is this vital thing.  That is why the non-elites think that ideas of everyone coming together are good.  

The Only Way Unity Works

The only reason that atoms, molecules, etc. form is because of something as vital--as fundamental a property of the verse as unification itself--is because unification happens only with discrimination.  Unification is discrimination.  For a very simple example, think about stars.  Stars only form when a bunch of hydrogen sticks together (unifies).  If you get a little hydrogen, a little helium, a little sodium, a little calcium, etc., you don't get a star.  The only way that a star is formed is if a lot of hydrogen gets together.  

This can be demonstrated on a smaller scale by crayons.  If you scribble with a bunch of different red crayons, you get red.  Yellow, yellow.  Green, green.  Purple, purple.  And so on.  When you mix all of them together, though, you get brown.  It's the same way that you only get stars by combining hydrogen.  

Same thing with humans.  If you discriminate and get together, respectively in three groups, a bunch of Chinese, a bunch of Scots, a bunch of Eskimos, and so forth, you build three societies.  Breeding and things like that work well.  If, though, you mix everything together, it doesn't work as well.  Like with the crayons, there is that brown mess, all the colors are gone, and it is a bad drawing.  In fact, it's not a drawing at all.  You have combined things--done part of unification--but you haven't really unified like things; you have just combined whatever you could.  

(Think also of trying to play a symphony every instrument just plays randomly.  All the musicians are blind and deaf, get told to do something with their instrument whenever they get poked, and every chair is a robot chair that pokes people randomly in the back.  What a bad symphony!  Just as good of an example is if you just mix together random things you find in the kitchen and then bake them for an hour.  Is it tasty?  Does that make for a good recipe?)  

Real Unity

As has been discussed, unification requires discrimination.  When you have that, you foster things like borders, nationalities, very limited immigration that requires cultural assimilation, and so forth.  We are seeing now the development of the opposite of this: a process of universalism, as exemplified by Jesusianism and Islam, expressed in the modern way as world government.  It is a very difficult pill to swallow for many Whites, but Christianity's universalism was the beginning of that.  Jahweh creating everyone from the same thing--the genesis cosmigasm, Adam/Eve, Noah's Ark, etc.--are all "we are the same" arguments!  Like the nonsense of pro-immigration vote-seekers now, it is the same thing.  True democracies never pursue that unity; that is why they must be regulated to form a farce of democracy, where free association is legally prevented (anti-discrimination laws; media narratives of how bad discrimination is; using education to force children to behave as though discrimination is bad, etc.).  The Abrahamic religions (Christianity and Islam foremost) encourage universalism, and that can be seen in the way they try to proselytize irrespective of race.  Yes, they'd inwardly PREFER one of their own, but their Abrahamic poison of choice has made clear that Jahweh/Allah has made ALL men as His children.  The universalism of today--being politically correct leading to Diversity, Equality, and Inclusion--is that same thing with fresh paint.  When a Deep European happily, freely bloviates "Christ is King!" that person not only betrays her or his brutalized ancestors, but carries on the old-style of the universalism that is so noxious--which foulness that person can usually recognize in updated, but sadly not archaic, form.  

The foulness of the future skimanagers is at least sensible--they want money--but the foolishness of the majority of NWO supporters is lamentable.  Like a dummy trying to get other Whites to respect European tradition by worshiping the rabbi from the Middle East, they are wrong in a fundamental way.  Yet, they help Decay, their idiocy breaking down societies in little bits that add up over time.