Self Interest
The theory presents itself that the enablers of decay are merely self-interested. Therefore, the enablers of decay wish to break down certain social standards through causing European societies to meld with other societies. The problem with this theory is that, when broken down, the prey/victim societies cannot feed or protect Decay, nor invent really cool things that improve Decay lives. For example, do you think that living to 50 is very old? Well, it used to be. If Europeoids keep inventing stuff, the average lifespan could raise from in the vicinity of 75 to in the vicinity of 117. Stuff that we now view as impossible, they used to view as impossible in BCE2000. And CE1000 as to CE3000 and so on. The issue of protection is more dramatic; if Decay lose their protectors, they will be conquered. What happens will not be nice nor fun, least of all for Decay--and yet, they do it!
Now, if you actually believe that populations of people who are some percentage ancestrally Norwegian, some percentage ancestrally Nairobian, some percentage ancestrally Eskimo, some percentage ancestrally Hottentot, and so forth can do math as well as people who are 100% ancestrally Norwegian, then, you are definitely not making immigration laws for Britain. Indoor plumbing, irrigated crops, stable houses, automobiles, and telephones etc., were made by people who were 100% ancestrally a certain way.
Decay can seem to be only predators or parasites. However, they are not. They are part of the environment. This part is decay.
That is why it can be very hard for you to accept what is happening: because decay is a vital part of the environment. You approve of decay. Nothing that you like—nothing wonderful that ever has existed—could have existed if the enablers of decay were not doing their thing (dispel from your mind the narcissistic geocentrism of Christianity; decay happens other places, too). Decay is horrible, despicable, and you very much do not want to be around what it does. Yet, it is part of a natural process. You want it to happen. In a way, from a different perspective, it is not horrible, it is good. That very different, completely apolar, state of how decay can truly be bad while truly being good shows the way that perspective is utterly important; is decisive.
Think of poop. Poop is not at all a good thing in one way--you know, for example, that you do not want to eat it--but you very much are glad it happens--you know, for example, that there are some things you like. Those things could not ever have come to be by you known without decay, and that is why you approve of decay happening even while you dislike what it does.
What? It says poop is something I like? Yes. As aforementioned, it is not a good thing to experience poop, but if there were no process for animals eating things that included elements they could not digest, there would be very little in the way of taste. Think of the food you like the most. After that, think of 100 other foods that are fine to eat. Were it not for poop, you could not eat a single one of those foods. That is why you are very glad that poop happens even though you simultaneously dislike poop. It is a truth that you both like and dislike poop.
Thinking of Decay that way can help you understand why you support Decay. Imagine that you are transported to a great city a few million galaxies over. There, you meet just the perfect person, and that person will be your mate forever. If the former people and things on the planet where that city is, the societies on that planet, did not decay for quite a while before you met that person, that person would never have existed.
Now back to the nastiness of dealing with Decay here. Much of the reason that Decay has survived here is that White idiots do what they do, protect and nurture Decay. Still, much as agents of decay within the human body strive tirelessly to destroy their own environment and then die, Decay work to do the same. Decay are killing themselves by trying to brown over all “whites.”
Specifically, when non-White governments cannot generate resources to be skimanaged, those chosen to get that money cannot then get those resources. Whites invent cool things you want to use in your daily life every so often; non-Whites do not. Decay use those things; Decay like those things. In 500 years, without Whites, there will be no inventions. Think of life without running water, indoor plumbing, or smartphones: all invented by White men.
When the inventors leave, such as when they actually aren't there and when all people remaining are mixed breeds instead, all that improvement will stop happening. No one will make new useful things. Moreover, no one will sufficiently maintain old things. Those things will fall into disrepair and stop being used. Think of a place where different types of people were once kept apart, and thus there were working power plants. One type of people built them; the other type couldn't even fix or maintain them. When the power plants had parts that wore out, no one fixed them. No one could fix them.
Similarly, no Whites means that whenever someone thinks an Arab country is growing too powerful, no one will destroy that country. Previously, stupid Whites would either kill Arabs themselves or make deadly things that would be used by other people to kill Arabs. But without Whites, that stuff will stop working. The protection will go away, the nice things will break, and it will not be at all fun. In the end, some Decay might realize a glimmer of there being no way to fix things and believe that trying to decay their own protectors was a bad idea, but it will be too late.
People who are partly White, and some clever other people too probably, will be able to maintain things for a while. They will sell what they inherited and be able to send even more money away for a while. But then the money will have no value.
The world will become, like western Europe has been for some time forecasting, a place from which the elves have left (think of the leprechaun with the gold that isn't actually real, and the many hidden other worlds stories of the British Isles). No one will remember exactly why. For a while—maybe a few generations—newspapers will report that production is up, white spirits of pure evil have been defeated again, and mixed breeds will ferociously try to run what they can. But then, the magic will become legend. Everything will devolve into a place like North America before the ships came back; like southern Africa before the ships came at all. No one will be able to do the magic. People will wonder why. They will become aware of different groups, have problems with them, and kill them.
Decay are fine with that, because decay is a feature of an environment cycling, like the way that digestion is a part of the body. The agents of decay do not seek a cherished place being given food and protection sustainably. If Decay were successful predatory or parasitical organisms, they would be fine with a cherished place being given food and protection sustainably. However, they are not these things. Decay are neither predators nor parasites. They are agents of decay. Decay are making things decay. Trying to analyze Decay as a predatory or parasitical strain does not work. They are headed for their own destruction—they have seen how people react to their agents for a very long time—and they keep doing the same things. As thousands of years of humans being on Earth has demonstrated, protecting and feeding Decay can only be done by Whites. Still, Decay seek the breakdown of White societies.
The actions of Decay make Decay seem evil, but on a larger scale they are not evil. Decay are, like poop, utterly disgusting, but you want them to do their thing. Like a controlled burn in a sick forest, decay helps organic arrangements of matter grow and expand to break down old groupings—molecules; cells; societies—and lets new things get formed. If you like forests, you support occasional forest fires. Earth has lightning strikes that spark burns when Forest Rangers are not part of the process; it is just a way that the environment is an environment. Like death, like poop, like occasional fires, the process of environmental regulation is not something you want to be in, but it is something that should happen—something you want to happen. You do not want to die; you do not want to get burned or be there when someone is taking a shit. However, you are glad that babies can breathe, that trees are pretty, and that tiramisu can taste good.
It seems sad—it is sad—when someone dies, when you look at the graveyard, or when you walk in the burned part of the forest. And for goodness’ sake, you don’t want to be around the poop, see some bloke pooping, or be in the forest fire. You very much do not want to be around certain parts of the process of maintaining an environment. (How emotion is a reaction to certain types of environmental change, and how a person’s character is shaped by an environment to which to react in a certain way, is a separate subject.)
Yet, it is a good thing when the environment goes through its process. When the fire burns up the tree, when the meat can’t be 100% digested and someone has to poop out what wasn’t needed, when the person dies, it is gross/sad. But then the particles help a plant grow, some pleasant person eats a cooked part of that plant that tastes great, and it’s just the process.
Decay is like a forest fire—or, if you prefer, like a reeking turd—that serves to better develop the use of stellar energy.
Comments
Post a Comment