Trains With No Eye

It can seem so big, so dramatic, when we realize that, "The dummies will kill most of us."  Like, low-IQ populations will take over the West, or everyone except a few will die from nukes, and then life will become this hellish dystopian struggle for maybe-survival looting the decaying artifacts of a better world that once was.  

Imagine that the whole planet is ruined.  Everyone on it dies.  Sucks, right?  Horrible.  A whole viable planet, uninhabitable.  Ruined.  

...Perspective, though.  Next, imagine some collective government of a lotta planets.  The smallest planet has only 50B people; the biggest 900B people.  How sad is it that everyone on Earth dies, then?  

The Popular Stories

The major Abrahamic religions of Earth try to make the Earth seem the center of everything.  Geocentrism is this.  That's easy to see.  Easy to miss, though, is that beginning stories are that same type of thing.  If you can see beyond Jesusianism's beginning story but not Bangism--or if you think the Bible is a metaphor when you want it to be, meaning you're like most Jesusians now and favor the Bangist Christian beginning story as a depiction of biblical proof--then you are still wholly Christianized.  That is why Bangist Christians, who think they're so smart and advanced because they know the Jesus stories are untrue narrative falsities (anthropomorphic fantasies from another age) are still Christianized.  Their insane clinging to universal egalitarianism--test scores will equalize after we eliminate all those nanoaggressions--can be seen.  Bangism and Jesusianism are not different--they are both universal philosophy.  

If you don't like the bad things that are part of universalism, such as a borderless global serfdom subject to unipolarity, then you should not be tricked into thinking that European history is rabbinical egalitarianism.  

Consider the picture: would you rather spend time with the man on the left (who loves you) or with the woman on the right?  

...so, whose hand do the men among you prefer to take?  Who do you men want to get to know better?

Made to Fit Together

Women and men are made of matter that builds bodies that fit together.  A "savior" from matter--a christ--is a severance from that.  Being a modern trains no eye person is this exact same argument.  "My invisible sky-friend saves me from the lifecycle!" is the same nonsense as "My self-identity means my chromosomes don't matter."  Both are claims of being separate from the lifecycle.  The loons respectively claiming to belong to one or the other "separate from the lifecycle" organization are really exhibiting the same type of behavior.  

(If he shaves, loses weight, and assures everyone +12 he is a woman, it still does not change a few trillion of his chromosomes from XY to XX.  Even if he somehow did that, they would probably all or most change within a little while, and they would keep being XY.  If everyone here doesn't die and modern economies resurface, then someday you will be able to buy as a consumer this rather cheap body into which to transfer yourself for use which has all XX chromosomes.  However, trains no eye dudes who do that will keep generating XY cells, and after a while their body will be some really good looking woman that is actually a man.  If you think it's weird now, just wait.  Figuring out the soul and how it relates, like figuring out the test scores various genetics produce, is verboten.  We like to congratulate ourselves on understanding how stupid were those priests who wouldn't look through Galileo's telescope, but we are doing the same type of thing.)  

Saying "Amen!" proudly to demonstrate your allegiance to S.R. is very much the same thing as believing that you respect everyone's choice of which of 137 genders to be and that choice indicating something real.  In 1000 years on Earth, if people are here still, maybe future trains no eye people will advocate that everyone good says gender doesn't matter and trains no eye people built the West.  The most popular stories then will be about how much Oliver Cornwell loved his boyfriend and how George Washington liked to wear dresses when no one was looking.  Will you like that?  That is how disgusting it is when the descendents of the European people victimized by Christianity say that you should worship S.R.--the symbol of the new overlords of the West, the mascot of the enslaver of your ancestors.

(With linguistics in mind, consider how the substitution of "gender" as an adjective for humans and not just words replaced "sex" as that adjective.  It is the same way that a word for happy became a word for men who like male bee-holes.)  

Pro Trains No Eye

A connection between trains no eye advocacy and rabbi-advocacy is too difficult for many to understand.  Think on controlled opposition, or just the simple hurt and betrayal of some guy discovering the person he thought was his friend was just someone operating undercover.  The negative reaction, potentially hostile, thinking over every moment you thought was nice and re-evaluating those moments within the context of the other person not being connected as you'd thought…to make the position more piquant, posit the undercover officer is an attractive woman who acted very well like she desired your company.  

That kind of situation can be likened to the way that Jesusianism can hurt people, and can be so difficult to identify for what it is.  People can recognize that meritocracy, acknowledgement of genetics, establishment of borders and societies, etc., are good things, but those people can be tricked into associating those things with the story of an official wise man from the Middle East.  

I'm Not Touching That

What S.R. was should be a giveaway, but like giving a starving prisoner a sandwich that got dropped on the ground, that damn dog licked it when I wasn't looking, and Larry the fat dude may have sort of sat on it when he was naked (getting mayo up his butt crack; eww), the association of Jesusianism with the very good, necessary, things that have been lost has been successful.  It seems ridiculous, but many people have come to identify those missing things with rabbi-worship.  That is why Jesusianism was such a good ideological weapon--it is built-in controlled opposition.  When Jesus says that every man is a brother (with the same father means that about men or sisters for women), when Jesus says don't focus on your family focus on me, and when Jesus says riches and the material world, our things about which good people aren't concerned, it is a complete giveaway of what that philosophy is.  However, just like the gross things that happened to that sandwich in the above example, if a person is genuinely starving he will eat that sandwich as best he can.  To think well about things, one should not just take the evidence of how eagerly that prisoner eats that sandwich as proof of how good is that sandwich, but consider the whole situation.  

Just like the two of the three tenets of Christianity we've covered--Genesis into Big Bang, mud sculptures in the paradise garden into Out of Africa (as we said, we just can't figure out how the fake story of badness in the story of the Passion of the Christ fits)--you can recognize how the official stories then and now match.  In the same way you can recognize that there is no invisible rabbi in the sky, you can evaluate "diversity is our strength" and "everyone is basically alike."  

Antilife

Christianity is antilife.  Jesusianism makes this explicit, saying that good people should be saved from the lifecycle by a savior.  Remember again that "christ" means "savior."  

Antilife is in addition trains no eye.  If a man does it with a trains no eye "woman" for a trillion-trillion times, how many babies do they have?  What if they have a trillion years, and do it 100 times every single day (including 110 times on 29 February for every leap year)?  That's right: zero.  The male orgasm is designed to cause males to want to and to actually transfer sperm to fertile females (not to other males, prepubescent females, lamp posts, etc.).  Like the way that the baby's drive toward the areola is meant to cause babies to want to and to actually feed, it is a desire conducive to life.  

The replacement of life things with antilife things is part of the decay process, and that is why the trains no eye silliness of crossdressing home ohs trying to get buggered instead of men spending time investing resources in women/families is the same.  Again, it is too difficult for many deceived into (or repressedly home oh) craving being with a loving man to perceive that.  

The key is how many babies trains no eye relationships produce.  That is antilife, like Jesusianism--like believing that it would be in any way good to be separated from the lifecycle.  Note also how the biblical replacement of Mother Nature by Father God was a vulgar foreshadowing not just of the co-option of holidays but the Abrahamic clerisy sexually abusing however many male children.  There were and are certainly some good people who've been deceived into saying/thinking all Europeoid goodness comes from S.R., but their being nice doesn't mean it was nice to trick them or that you should privately, truly believe that what they're saying about why is true their rationalization for how they've been given strength to do nice things.