Safe Women

One of the great achievements of the West has been to establish cultures where it was safe for females to operate independently--to move about, buy-sell-trade, get jobs, go home and to work, etc., as they personally felt like.  Just as Jesusian egalitarianism made a very few invaders immigrants permissible as a lead-up to what is now a much greater number of invaders immigrants, the movement of "feminism" is now showing its ripening as females get hurt/killed.  

Cui Bono

Who were the real beneficiaries of patriarchy, chivalry, etc.?  Females.  Think about this in light of how it was considered proper to hold the door for a woman/girl.  Who really benefits?  Various theorycrafting has established ridiculous notions that it was to imply that the male holding the door was doing it to rule society, to show how great he was, etc., but no--ridiculous.  

(To see beyond similar ridiculous things, use the way that holding open a door for someone being presented as expressing dominance as mental fodder to conceptualize thinking about how survival-winning genes developed pathological altruism.)  

The real beneficiary was the female who didn't have to open the door.  If people start buying A.I. 'bots who walk around opening doors, turning on lights, etc. for them, that isn't because the robots are secretly planning to take over the world; it's really just a nice little convenience to have that done for you.  

Very many P.S.V.S. (Papers Saying you're Really Smart; degrees) have been handed out for crap like this, and people have spent decades giving lectures, writing books, and teaching classes about the nuances of how being a subservient menial-task-performer (a patriarch) shows various forms of domination.  Silly, but remember again, Europeans spent over a thousand years saying they believed that good people acted in order to please an invisible, all-powerful man who lived in the sky.  The absurdities of Christianity are repetitive; there is no intellectual victory for either Bangists or Jesusians, though there is an ample supply of gigglesnorting at dumbasseries supported by the other side.  

Vulnerability

The situation that occurs between the sexes in a meiotic species is quite understandable to Earthling humans.  Males are possessed of an urge to disseminate seed through discriminating between females, approving more of the ones who possess better genetic traits, and applying female-body-given friction to a pleasure spot, and it is a common defect that is now called a goodness when part of that goes missing (i.e. home ohs still wanting that friction but from a male defecatory orifice).  Matching that meiotic desire, healthy females are possessed of a custom-designed friction-supplier.  What those females have is sized, regularly moisturized, and textured just right for those males, who generally specifically desire that component.  We bet you know what those parts are (humans tend to know).  

Because of the complete prevalence of these parts, a certain problem has developed among humans: it is called "rape."  There are males who do not assign any value to the female's desire nor acceptance, and dangerously sick ones who impose the act upon those who have not even attained puberty.  This happened, and one of the facets of civilization was making it not happen--sometimes people broke the rules and it happened, but it could not happen if the rules were followed.  

The Rules

The Usican "Sexual Revolution," and its counterparts in mainland Europe and the British Isles, were a way of attacking females, making their orifices vulnerable to the bad/sickbad assaults to which they had not before been vulnerable.  

Here are the rules: 

1) Females wanting to go to sleep always get protection from trusted males (husband, father, brother, grandfather, etc.).  Like, if you're a man with a daughter, and she wants to spend the night with a friend, the father has to meet the other father.  

2) Females wanting to spend their day somewhere always get protection from trusted males--this is extremely unlikely to be possible in a business situation, which has obvious implications for commerce.  

3) Females wanting anything always get protection from trusted males.  

...As can be seen, the common thread here is that females always get protection, which protection must be given them by trusted males!  Given that human females about always have a sized, regularly moisturized, and textured just right for human males orifice, and that males (age/health permitting) about always want to insert their pleasure-area into that, that is a constant human trait.  

Expected Behavior

As with the abortion issue, a society can develop this incredibly invasive dystopian surveillance, or it can develop either: 

Islamic propriety or

Europeoid expectation.  

Now, we can see how horrid consequences are when the former is imposed upon Europeoids.  Europeoid females have been able to show their bodies and hair under certain expectations about self-control.  I.e. some guy can look and think, Oh, she's pretty!  That's nice.  Now, what's for dinner?  However, other types of men will think, I will have sex with her now!  The consequences are obviously quite unpleasant.  What Jesusian Christianity was designed to do was to say that people were all fundamentally the same, which is why many of the early Romans recognized that the stories about the world-creating rabbi who pronounced egalitarianism were very dangerous if they got popular.  The sense of wrongness many of today's Jesusians ironically feel when they see some modern anti-matter person advocating for common property or immigrants deserving the benefits of citizenship is this.  Like hearing a tiger breathing in the dark, they know it is a very bad thing, and the irony comes from them thinking that an earlier version of egalitarianism will spare people from a later version of egalitarianism.  

Think of the danger of the thought I will let my little boy spend time alone with a respected man who refuses to touch a woman because he has devoted his life to a divine man.  The consequences have been horrible as well as gross.  Often forgotten in the same way are that faith-based conclusions about racial behavior have forestalled development in Europeoid societies for over 1,600 years.  This is not a new struggle--this is the struggle that began with the christianization of Europe.  It has been going for quite a while.  

Making Women Safe

In the way that many machines need lubricant of some kind to operate well, the relatively relaxed provisions of female freedom relied upon the relatively non-rapey behavior of Europeoid males.  We have, as aforementioned, seen the gross things that can happen when access to women/children is assumed okay and when the penalties for sexual abuse of minors is something other than capital.  The transition from "pee doughs die" to "divine man forgives everything, including pee dough behavior, if you imagine really hard," has been a horrible, disgusting part of the Jesusian poison used on Europe.  

The way to keep women/children safe is to re-adopt the old ways that Europeoids had used for a very long time.  They're very complicated: 

1) Children should be supervised by women; 

2) Females should always (always always always) get the protection of some man.  

Think about how Legacy Christianity broke this first as part of its mission to let home oh pee doughs and ray piston ists begin the process of not just taking European lands but the reproductive orifices of Europeoid females and the defecatory orifices of Europeoid males.  Teachers of little kids were either an extremely small percentage of male tutors employed by wealthy fathers, or women.  The guards always expected to guard females were usually their fathers or people whom their fathers knew, or as the girl matured, supervised dating first, then when trust was built and marriage was likely, he could be responsible.  

Imagine some wicked perv who wants to orgasm off children.  In the old days, no go.  Post-Christianity, he just becomes a priest.  Some wicked rapist, no go.  

The freedom and liberation of feminism and ending the patriarchy have horribly demonstrated, for a very long time, what they were really about.  When some authoritative home oh is abusing a child, or some ray piston ist a grown or pending woman, it can be easily seen that it would not have been an oppression if that society had never let that man supervise groups of children or put that woman in a situation where she had to walk home by those with a time preference dangerous to her.  As with Jesusianism, the various "killing many in a village to gift the survivors the knowledge of Christ" or the related "bombing places to gift the survivors the knowledge of democracy," the purported freedom of various female-related rubrics was just a ruse to get access to orifices.