Salvation

Do not be fooled by the excoriation of Jesusian Christianity (Legacy Christianity; traditional Christianity) so often seen here into thinking that all the good things you like, all the good things you know are good, are also disliked.  Torah 3.0, a.k.a. Islam, is indeed a horrible thing, and compared to that, Jesusian and Bangist Christianities are much, much better.   

Torah 4.0, the developing post-Enlightenment progressivism, is currently the Christian (saved from matter!  Not Jesus-based, but "saved from matter"-based!) philosophy of the West.  Like the earlier form of Christianity, it dominates the West.  

Legacy Christianity is a bad, terrible thing, and it laid the foundation for the Islamization of Europe.  It is a very sad thing for the spirits of many generations of Europeoid predecessors that their distant offspring have come to think that they have no earlier, much larger history.  

If you dislike the creeping Islamization of Europe, then you should dislike Jesusian Christianity, for you are now better able to see what Jesus’ egalitarianism, His “all men are brothers” message and so forth, has wrought.  Globalism is the Kingdom of God on Earth.  If you're a Europeoid--a White person--you trying to resist the insane, hypocritical manipulations of globalism now is like your farfathers trying to keep Europe safe from egalitarianism.  The message that everyone should be equal because they're all fundamentally the same and riches are bad, we need to make a better world where we get rid of riches and just focus on singing kumbaya together, should be something Jesusians can easily discern, but they have been tricked.  

If you have been able to see globalism advance in recent years, then broaden your scope a little (like Jesusians trying to fit the creation of humans into 6 days succumbing to 6,000 years then 10-20 billion years; haha) to see how the Middle Eastern invasion of European culture originated from Legacy Christianity.  

(The creation of man is another expression of man-desire performed by Legacy Christianity.  The sex-abuse scandals of various denominations of Christian preachers is not at all a surprise.)  

Chauvet

"Chauvet Cave" is a place where art on the wall shows that there were people in what is now France doing that sometime more than 32K years ago.  

Now, that art was probably done by Cro Magnons.  Cro Magnons had larger brains than the other species of proto-human great apes.  If you can see any similarity between smarter, larger brained Europeoids and less intellectually apt peoples of other places, you are probably not welcome to be a politician.  

Jesus

That is the foundation into which stepped the character of Jesus.  Europeans were observing the stars and planets; Jesusianism stopped that.  Those same Europeans had an appreciation for natural places, conceptualizing of a Mother Nature who had made things; Jesusianism stopped that.  Europeans were keeping 100% of non-Europeoids out of Europe; Jesusianism stopped that.  A few slaves, a few menial laborers, and then people in the Western Roman Empire started having curly darker hair and the Roman Empire fell.  

Ever wonder why those Romans knew that the egalitarianism advocated by this fictional story about this amazing rabbi was bad?  Because it was.  The Great Replacement is only a later phase of Jesusian Christianity.  When you want people to say "Amen!" and think-text (pray) to your invisible friend (who has different preferences depending on whom you ask, where you ask them, and at what time you ask them), you have been tricked into preferencing a Middle Eastern story over Europeoid genes.  If you are a Deep European, rabbi-worship is not your history.  

Not Good

Let it be understood that Torah 3.0 is bad.  Very bad.  Destructive of culture and destructive of life.  Discrediting Torah 2.0 does not mean one is an unwitting tool of a bad character in the Torah 2.0 story, or a similar sort of useful dupe to Torah 4.0 (Bangist Christianity; modern spiritless Saiunce).  You may have come to recognize that many things are controlled opposition, set up "disagreements" and "conflicts" that have the ultimate point of getting people to think that one side of an issue is good because it opposes something bad.  This is not so; the way you define "chimpanzee" is not "thing which eats bananas."  Jesusianism is just such a ridiculous conceptualization, being gigantically stupid--there is this omnipotent, invisible human who loves you--and should not be made an idealogical foundation for goodness.  

Consider these good things: 

1) Mating and offspring-nurturing pairs; 

2) Societies designed to promote reproductive growth.  

See how both of those things are good, in the sense that good means "good for life"?  That is why a marriage where someone is sterile, some people in their seventies getting remarried after their former spouses died, etc. is good, but "gay marriage" is not: the former facilitates life by being instructive to even pre-language toddlers to "do this," while the latter facilitates empty chairs at empty tables by being instructive as to humans not being there.  

That is the horrible battle of trains no eye advocacy and/or home oh advocacy now: that of life v. death.  "There shall be life" v. "There shall not be life" is well expressed on the difference between a man and woman formally mated pair who each have <5 sexual partners and have two kids as opposed to a man and a man formally mated pair who each have >200 "sexual" partners and have zero kids.  The split between Orgasms Never Diapers and Orgasms Rarely Diapers is a great allusion to the matter from which you're supposed to want Jesus to save you--a clear expression of life v. non-life.  

Saving?  Haha--dark humor.  If a person is "saved" from the cycle of births, what is that person?  Eternal death--void.  The conception that it is just fine for human males to redirect their desire for producing life (orgasms; proven effective at least a few billion times this century) toward the orifices where other males defecate is a different, grosser, quite dramatic expression of salvation from matter i.e. leaving the life cycle.  Many home ohs have proudly and pleasurably done so, and they of late don't even have to tell little boys to clean the pipe organ!  

By contrast--and why it is so disgustingly fitting that man-focused imagery of Jesus had to replace the woman- and family-focused imagery of Europe before christianization--young men preferring imagery of females, wanting to desire females and families, are life-producing things.  It is pitiful that modern Jesusians can react to Bert and Ernie, gay rights etc., but not to the much-older, much more homoerotic man-focus of Legacy Christianity that has deceived them.  Developing Jesusians showed themselves quite able to identify as antilife (they of course did not use that word) man-focused stories, but didn't think about what it meant that Jahweh was alone above the waters for 7,000 years before having a son without having to touch a woman (Virgin Mary, remember?) and that son never having a girlfriend.  

The monumental homoeroticism of Legacy Christianity is easy to see once you give it the simplest glance unfiltered.  Some of the tellers of the early Robin Hood story remembered to add Maid Marion, but Torah 2.0 was utterly unconcerned with females, and the specific contempt with which it treated the prior "woman" and "family" stories reveals more.  Okay, maybe Bert and Ernie just happened to devote their lives to another man and have no girlfriends because of randomness, but if their producers had also made it a capital crime for little boys to watch anything else, that would have approached Jesusianism in trying to get most human males to pay attention to another man instead of what they want.  

The battle between life and antilife has been well expressed in Christianity.  It is like the sadness of Legacy Christians realizing the spiritless anti-tradition of modern anti-Jesusian culture of the modern world, therefore rejecting tradition and spirit by thinking their people's history began with Jesusianism (again, 32K > 1600).  Their ability to tell that something is wrong when moderns (maybe unconsciously) try to shift focus from women/families to close male relationships is like watching a football (soccer) team able to score a goal but then leave the field to have a party while the clock is still running--and then acting surprised when the other team just keeps scoring goals against them one by one.