Christianity Rules

(The  Swedish bikini team expelling one member while getting ready for a shoot.   Cajsa was kicked off the team because the others said she didn't present the right image.) What is Pathological Altruism? The explanation of why White people engage in self-hurting behavior has been called "pathological altruism."  However, this is incorrect (more correct in the vein of that type of naming would be autopathological altruism, because yes their behavior does hurt other people--as when White British women who do not get raped advocate for more Arabs invading Britain.  However, the illustrative point of the term should have been "autopathological," because the harm a person does to her- or himself stands out more).  The phenomenon of pathological altruism attempts to explain auto-harmful behavior in much the same way that one can attempt to explain lightning by saying an invisible sky-man throws the bolts down.  It is a manifestation of the mistaken belief th...

Jahweh--Yahweh, Jehovah, or Jesus--is a terrible character.  Luckily the Bible is fiction, because if there were such a character of penultimate foulness/power as the biblical Father (S.R.; Jesus; God), that character would be so terribly evil and powerful that resisting him would be the only possible good action.   Is This a Test? Jesusians should consider that: if this existence is a test of quality.  If you follow the biblical Jesus, you support a child-murderer who is not even a teensy bit repentant but upholds that they all deserved it, and if not, you do not support that mass-child-murderer.  If an all powerful god wanted to see which creations had turned out good or not, which ones should be tossed into hell and which elevated to paradise, you can guess how the "do you support mass-child-murder?" figures into that.  Jesusians who say "Christ is King!" are telling God, "Child-murder is AOK with me!" proudly advertising that they're suitable for d...

The thing about Jesus is that He is so great because He is so great.   When you bend over to Him to be filled by His Grace, you—oh.   Ists.   Right.   Universalism.   The notion presented in both Jesusian and Bangist Christianity that “everything that is came to be because of a big explosion in outer space” is universalism —is Christianity.   When people talk about what was once called the beginning of the Book of Genesis but what is now called the Big Bang, they are reinforcing the notion of common origins.   Like the fictions of the paradise garden (Adam & Eve) and Noah's Ark, t he same with what is what was once called the middle of the Book of Genesis, which is now called Out of Africa, they are "common origins" stories.   These stories—the Big Bang; Out of Africa—are not theories.   Their adherents do not respond to contradictory evidence as they would if they were operating scientifically.   The current popular faithfad of th...

People who are what is called the single word version of trains without an eye (TWAE) do not actually strive to “transcend” traditional sexual roles.   Rather, they subscribe to those traditional sexual roles even moreso than normal people—people who are actually the sex the opposite-sexed TWAE is trying to act.   It can not seem so, but there are traditional social roles for “ homoerotic  male who crossdresses to signal orgasm-giving frictive availability to other men.”   That is a traditional role, and that has not changed over the years even though, like a new form of Christianity, such as Bangist science, it is being presented as a new thing to take awareness of such entities.   “Pretentious male narcissist who wants to be valued for giving orgasms to other men” is such a traditional role.   Unlikable, socially troublesome, yes, but there.  Extant.  It is not a new thing at all.  It is a very old thing; a very common thing.  A ...

Jesus is incredibly right.   Even Ists say morality-based vegetarians are incredibly wrong, definitionally wrong.   Despite this, many people end up thinking moral vegetarians must be at least a little bit right.   What people like Savitri Devi were saying is that Christianity is a foreign element which broke down societies (gasp!  So surprising!).   However, they were not saying that Christianity was a tool of decay, as is correct, but rather that (Jesusian, the kind most people think is the only kind) Christianity was bad in much the same way that Jesusians think that people who say they do things for the fictional character in the red pajamas (Satan; duh) are definitely proof of the badness of being against the good fictional character (Jesus).  It is their version of an incorrect mental trap (dialectic) into which they've fallen.   Such people (Devi) feel that Christianity is very evil, because it elevated human things even if those human thin...

The policies which are supported in human societies when it's time for them to decay out are literally against life.  That is from where the term "antilife" comes.  It isn't some cheesy scary "Ooh then the antagonist is wearing a ghost mask and he has a weapon!" fantasy.  It isn't the derivation of Jesusianism, i.e., "Ooh he says he supports the character in red pajamas who's against Jesus!"  It's drawn from the fact that bad  things are literally against life.   Antilife.  Like the way that antimatter and matter don't mix well.  Those things often get culturally blended with reaffirmations of other universalist nonsense, like, "The rabbi likes the family and this was against the family so it's bad and you should do what the rabbi wants!"  However, that kind of stuff makes it a little easier for other bad stuff to happen.  Adopting the cultural mantle of a supporter of the recognized bad character ("Satanism"...

The farmer is so nice.   He gives food to me and all of my friends!   Who would be so crazy as to say the farmer isn’t nice?   Laugh.   The farmer’s behavior isn’t explained by him being not nice or nice.   He is doing that because he knows that if you get food, you will produce wool/milk/eggs/meat.   That is what he really cares about.   He is farming you.   Your entire life is, and the lives of so many others are—the lives of everything on the entire farm are—based upon that farmer (or boss/owner, if it is a really big farm) getting that wool/milk/eggs/meat.   Most people cannot believe there is a farm.   They think that the reason they are getting food is that everything is random and it just worked out that way, farmers are nice, or some other “reason.”   If you know that there are farmers, such example can still help you.   Does one hate the farmer?   Dislike the farmer?   No!   Doing that would be a grea...