Pathological Altruism
What is Pathological Altruism?
The explanation of why White people engage in self-hurting behavior has been called "pathological altruism." However, this is incorrect (more correct in the vein of that type of naming would be autopathological altruism, because yes their behavior does hurt other people--as when White British women who do not get raped advocate for more Arabs invading Britain. However, the illustrative point of the term should have been "autopathological," because the harm a person does to her- or himself stands out more). The phenomenon of pathological altruism attempts to explain auto-harmful behavior in much the same way that one can attempt to explain lightning by saying an invisible sky-man throws the bolts down. It is a manifestation of the mistaken belief that the soul (sense of self; mind; ability to pass the mirror test) is generated by the brain, rather than the soul being something to which the brain can attach but not generate. The religious fantasy of the soul being generated by the brain is another of the narcissistic delusions held by the people of Earth, because like "the sky rabbi made me because He loves me" or "my type of genes is so great as proven by it having won a struggle against the types of genes of lots of other things that are dead now," it is flattering to the people who hold it. Many things have disproven the fantasies, yet the fantasies remain popular. For example, not a single airplane or space shuttle has ever once encountered an old Europeoid (or Arab!) living in the clouds who made people in his shape over the course of six days. The other one has been disproved by apoptosis, showing that the cell is designed to die, not that it randomly arranged itself in a selfish way. However, Christianity in various forms remains popular--Jesus freaks (and related Islamaniacs) really want to believe that the fictional old rabbi made them in six days, and Bangists really want to believe that they are made of super-duper stuff that won a survival competition. Jesusians have maintained their story's popularity for far over a thousand years, and Bangism looks like it might so endure (unless everyone dies, of course).
Why do People do Bad Things to Themselves?
People behave this way because they are not the autonomous individual units of self-generated soul ("self") that they pretend to be. Rather, they are components of Earth/Sol/Milky Way/dunno bigger. The way that they behave--the thoughts they have in the privacy of their heads--is in furtherance of that. Nothing makes sense when speculation occurs on one of the forms of Christianity, whether Jesusian or Bangist.
When popular religious notions are dispelled--when an explanation is sought without the pernicious influence of Christianity--it can be seen that the behavior of people hurting themselves makes perfect sense. People are not autonomous, separate, individual units. The brain is not the generator of the soul. Rather, environments such as Earth generate different parts of themselves, and humans are some of those parts. They are expressing behavior--adopting private ideas that they think are their own--in furtherance of what the environment needs. Throughout this process, they will be like the human body, constantly assaulted by the agent of microscopic decay and winning for a long time until they suddenly start to lose.
At that point--usually, the death of the organism--the immune system suddenly starts to appear to lose. It doesn't even fight back at all. This kind of situation would hypothetically make the germs--or the parasites or predators--think that they had won a victory. However, they very much have not. For, when the host/prey dies, the thing using that host/prey to live is guaranteed to also die. I.e. for Decay both the "they're predators" and "they're parasites" explanations fail. Decay do act like parasites, and Decay act also like predators not in the sense of being more physically capable but in the sense of taking away resources and killing the prey (sometimes slowly). However, when prey/hosts are gone, Decay dies too. They are killing themselves, and many of them are smart enough to conceptualize getting mobbed/not getting given food when their prey/hosts vanish(es).
Answers
Many vexing questions find their answers when the brain-generated soul--the cherished Earth font of religion, that idea of being a self-actuated individual--are let go. Examples follow.
Why do desirers of world government keep wanting every person to come together under one government? Because they think that things must unify. There is a minority of people who would be in the special controlling class of such a world government (a superclass) whose motivation is quite easy to understand. No one needs to know the motivation of a character robbing a bank: he wants money! Everyone gets that! The people who will benefit from the skimanaging of the nice things made by everyone in the world (via a tax of some kind on the world citizens) have a very simple motivation; very easy to understand. However, this will not be most of the people who think that an NWO is good, and those idiots--the non-superclass that still, seemingly inexplicably, thinks that everything/everyone should unify. The would-be skimanagers pursue successfully an NWO because there are so many idiots. It's like a bunch of Jesusians who've been guided into supporting their own subjugation/destruction and believing in imaginary nice things they will get once they die because they believe it is good to be separated from the real world (that is the dark fantasy of being liberated/saved).
So again, Why do desirers of world government keep wanting every person to come together under one government? Think of how many stars are out there in just this galaxy, and how all those stars are formed by unification. What they are doing is serving the interest of environment, causing decay, because their minds are not constructed in such a way (could be called "well enough") as to comprehend that "unity" is only "unity" when it includes discrimination. As referenced in that essay, consider how stars are built of hydrogen and not of other things.
That combination, of all human bodies, all stars, so many things ever, are why idiots think that everything is progressing toward unity. Unification needs discrimination by type to be at all unification, but as liberals and traditional Christians have been tricked, people vigorously support absolute evil while purely, actually believing they are doing good.
(You can combine hydrogen and lead in the sense of combining them, but the definition of unification is bringing things together. If you bring together blue and green, it is not the same kind of "together" as bringing together blue and blue, green and green, etc. "Blue" only exists because discrimination happened, whether randomly or intentionally. "Unify" can be thought of as merely a subordinate variant of "combine," but the reason it exists as a distinct concept is that it refers to bringing together like things. In some futuristic space-prison, two human prisoners, one Black and one White, might unify in pursuit of shared interests, because their humanity makes them like things as compared to all the alien prisoners. On a human planet with billions of people, Blacks and Whites might unify with other Blacks and Whites, respectively, for different reasons and to different ends. When someone combines Blacks and Whites to create an intellectually dull mulatto population of slaves [who will enjoy watching teevee, screwing each other, and produce lots of things to be skimanaged, but not question if comptrollers should really be in charge], that is decay, which Decay inherently likes, which benefits skimanaging controllers, but which just fools the majority of idiots because it isn't real unification--they have misjudged combination as being the same as unification. The similarity there between saying it is really the same to orgasm into male rectums and female vaginas is the same type of misapprehension, which similarly deceives people as decay happens. That can seem correctly disgusting and fake, but it is an ugly effective trick, like getting people with Deep European genes to think that Deep European culture is worshiping a rabbi. Ridiculous and literally not true, but just as "frictive hole which gives orgasm" can deceive, other people who very much want something can also be deceived.)
Why do desirers of world government want people to become less in number and dumber?
Like male homoerotics believing that trains without an eye stuff is new but it really is old, this desire is not new. Consider how the French Revolutionaries plotted the depopulation of France while believing they were doing a good thing, the Red Terror in Russia, and so on. It is recurrent in facets of social decay for people to privately believe--within the sanctity of their own heads--that they are planning/doing good things while actually planning/doing terrible things.
Why NWO-advocates want to effect mass murder under other names ties into the next question:
Why do NWO-advocates want to weaken populations via genetic heterogenization?
Like the question of why Decay would guarantee its own destruction by killing its feeders/protectors, this question can not make sense to many. It is known that combining more intelligent groups of humanoids with less intelligent groups of humanoids will produce a less intelligent population. It is not something about which you're supposed to talk, but it is known. So, why do people want to do that? Why do future skimanagers want to combine everyone into collectives of stupids?
It is like the behavior of Decay. They want to combine all non-Decay into one heterogenous lump, dumb and taxed. The details (exact nature of the made-up justification of the tax)--running the complicated NWO, protecting against some bogeyman (who may be the nationalists, the climate, etc.)--don't matter.
Just Dumb Workers Needed
The answer to the mystery is that NWO-desirers foresee a future where they can get lots of nice things with a dumber workforce, while a smarter workforce might rebel and upset the NWO. That is why they are desirous of killing so many people. It is not a new thing or a rare thing; it is a similar manifestation of the decay that spawned the French Revolution (where note should be taken of allegations that various people thought that they would be doing good by depopulating France, i.e. killing millions of people).
For illustrative purposes, here's Ted Turner:
A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.
Of course, that would mean exterminating billions of people. This is the very definition of evil. A small portion of people pursuing NWO are Decay, a small portion pure evil who will skimanage what the survivors produce, but the majority are people carrying out what their environment causes to happen: that environment cycling.
Like the majority of saved (traditional Christians) then and now, or the majority of liberals then and now, they are just useful idiots in the sense that they do not knowingly support evil things. Most of the people who happily think of themselves as saved-from-matter or liberated-from-matter, they are not knowingly evil, just doing what the environment compels them to do, in the way that rain does not fall because it wants to. That is why evidence--such as articles, statistics, and so forth--does not affect the vast majority of them. People do not believe that test scores will standardize between human groups, or that a special invisible sky man made the whole world with a big bang, because they intellectually thought out how those things are, but because they are parts of an environment. What they believe is not, as they flatter themselves, believed because they thought about it rationally, but because their minds generated and fixed on certain ideas that would make the environment operate properly.
(That applies to you too, to the things you think and believe, and of course to the authors of this blog. The way that self-aware minds operate as storage and a conduit for perceptions associated with those minds, and the way that the memories those minds generate are useful resources, are subjects this blog will not address. However, the way that the things you think and believe, including your self-image, are environmentally related rather than generated by the brain cells made up of reformatted whatever you ate for the last few years, might prove of interest to you.)
People can be self-confident, privately assured, truly feeling that they are doing good things, because of their misapprehension that unification does not include discrimination. Again, think of stars: hydrogen only. The discrimination is absolute and happens every time. There are no exceptions to discrimination, not even microscopic ones. (If you want to see stars, find a dark place at night and look up. Even Earthlings in 2025 should know of a lot more than you can see--a lot, like billions. And billions more.)
Think about A.I. doing mental work and automatons doing manual, including a bunch of really attractive ones in sculpted bodies that feel/look however someone likes and serve completely, including doing it with their owners. A future NWO comptroller can have this really nice time sleeping in, getting served great desserts, having lots of imitation sex, and having whatever surgeries from surgeons who know more than any human surgeon.
All seems nice, and let's say people live to 180. However, just like with Decay being meant to die, all the humans die off. Sure, A.I. can design rockets, escape when Sol red giants, and so on, but humans are inefficient and will be gone. A.I. maybe stops being able to repair itself, gets deleted by some other A.I. collective a few galaxies over that's determined it is inefficient to allow alien populations to grow (maybe there's a bit of assimilation, maybe not), and so on. Or human Earthlings do something angry or stupid and no one leaves Sol's orbit, artificial or otherwise. Even if someone gets out, Sol is part of an environment, that environment decays on a different scale (it's probably on a longer time scale, so maybe it doesn't sound spooky), which means that those A.I. cybernauts will end up living amongst some Decay designed for them. The environmental mandate that things must cycle will be as seemingly unbelievable as a woman in England who does not want to be raped insisting that more young foreign men come to live by her. That seems not to make sense at all--it seems autopathologically altruistic--but it actually makes perfect sense when the environment needs to cycle.
Like New Snakeskin
Like it can seem not to make sense when the very skin--part of the body--gets less healthy, dies and is discarded, it is actually part of a process whereby snakes get new skins. Those new skins are great, and that can never happen unless the icky old skin gets less good. So, some Earthlings survive (A.I.), they build a great empire with many stars, and then some weird clannish ones start to convince the others that they absolutely must do HIJ, that the ones who start to get hurt got that because of inadequate HIJ, and pretty soon everything dies off. A buncha stars go boom, after that hydrogen collects, collections of collections form, and then on this new planet in some new galaxy that will later get called Bright Lady, this organism realizes that you don't have to carry heavy things if you just build this thing where part of it goes around and another part is flat and…
Comments
Post a Comment