Trains Without An Eye

People who are what is called the single word version of trains without an eye (TWAE) do not actually strive to “transcend” traditional sexual roles.  Rather, they subscribe to those traditional sexual roles even moreso than normal people—people who are actually the sex the opposite-sexed TWAE is trying to act.  

It can not seem so, but there are traditional social roles for “homoerotic male who crossdresses to signal orgasm-giving frictive availability to other men.”  That is a traditional role, and that has not changed over the years even though, like a new form of Christianity, such as Bangist science, it is being presented as a new thing to take awareness of such entities.  “Pretentious male narcissist who wants to be valued for giving orgasms to other men” is such a traditional role.  Unlikable, socially troublesome, yes, but there.  Extant.  It is not a new thing at all.  It is a very old thing; a very common thing.  A modern-day TWAE acting like it is a new discovery that a man in makeup acting obtrusively submissive (sic) to attract men desiring friction from other men's bodies is deluded as to the novelty of his act.  Pervs in 1800 A.D. London, in 274 B.C. Timbuktu, etc., were shaving intensely, talking in high voices, and wearing dresses to effect buggery.  It is not new to be TWAE.  

People learned that such a TWAE had a high potential for being a social problem, and thus didn’t like them.  The concept of “homophobia” and calling such people a variant of “happy” stems from that.  If you want to see that such behavior is normal for such people, then become an attractive man, wear very little or nothing (something styled after S.R.'s True Loincloth?), and go walk around certain parts of the Usican city of San Francisco at certain times.  

There are two components to this issue: (1) the behavior engaged in by people who attempt to manifest a different sex than they have, and (2) the way that language has been employed in order to vest society with the message that sex has been transcended.  As with the denoting of the entire verse (space and planets and stuff) as united ("universe"--the NWO has been working for a looong time) it is a political statement disguised as mere aloof verbality.  The misemployment of the common single word for TWAE is incredibly meaningful, but not often seen to be so.  

Consider how calling the intensely sad homoerotics a word for “happy” shows that the use of language is very effective.  Even people who think of themselves as opposed to sodomy etc. talk about gays, gay issues, and so forth.  So, the people are calling their purported bad-ones happies!  People who have always believed themselves against sodomy and the sodomitical lifestyle have been wholly captured by the language.  This effect is the same as the way that people—even Browns themselves—have been led into employing “absolutely evil” as their chosen way of referring to Browns (“Blacks”).  

(The personality presented by many male homoerotics, particularly submissive sexual recipients ["Bottoms"], of exuberantly happy, flippant and carefree, is like the "Don't do gay things!  I really, really don't like gayness!" style of perspectives on sexuality in the Bible--overcompensation.  Men who realize they are growing old, will grow old, are probably going to die in a while, etc., naturally feel unfulfilled [or that they will later feel unfulfilled] when they reflect upon a life spent in pleasurable pursuits which will wholly vanish upon death, which they tend to think is a complete vanishing of the self.  The production of offspring is how normal humans address this, thus the sad feeling of missing fulfillment that homoerotic men tend to perceive when they contemplate existence.  Some dude can have 300 friends, 3 very close relationships with trust and consideration, and 30 million orgasms, but still realize it all goes away 'pon death.  Thus gay men getting called a happy variant, and individuals pretending their character is happy and carefree to counter the crushing emptiness they feel inside.  The effusive flamboyance, the melodramatic detachment, the spotty fixation on random things, that has characterized a certain type of gay men is caused by this.  In the same way that you can see gray hairs appearing as someone hits a certain age, a natural relationship between certain types of behavior presents itself--and so is it when a human society starts to revere that type of behavior.)  

The commonly used single word for TWAE is the same.  A man who wishes to dress in a female way and be treated as a female etc. can call himself the common variant of "transcendently sexual" and most people do not see any problem.  However, the attempt to dress, coiffure, effect and affect bearing, mannerisms, speech, and so forth, indicate that the original traditional sexual role is immensely, totally important.  The desire of homoerotic “bottoms” to be available to a man or men, orgasmically satiate a man or men, please a man or men, etc. is the same.  By attempting to fulfill the traditionally female role, one is immersing oneself in--trying to validate--not transcending, that role.  

(The overcompensation aspect is prevalent.  Consider how the character Jahweh insists he doesn't like treating men like women, how male homoerotics keep feelings of an unfulfilled, empty life private and call themselves a variant of happy, and how the people most concerned about traditional sexual roles call themselves transcendent as to such roles.  In the same way, the people most concerned with racism established the most expressly racist policies ever [affirmative action] in order to "fix" racism, and AZT was prescribed to fight AIDS.  The way that old money pushed for war in Vietnam while funding supposedly anti-war movements is more of this, as is the way the supposedly anti-terrorist U.S. created and funded terrorist organizations.  The show of creating something so you can have against it a glorious battle is endemic to Christianity.  Of course, a millennia of priests/preachers leading communities in battling Satan while surprising/scaring little boys by touching their privates is an incredibly gross version of the same thing.)  

It is immensely hypocritical of advocates for Blacks, gays, and trains without an eye people to employ those respective Christian terms.  For Blacks, saying that someone is part of a completely evil group is completely invalidating arguments to the contrary.  Similarly, by calling themselves part of the "happy" community, homoerotic women and men are invalidating investigation into the causes of their late-life sorrow and feelings of incompleteness, as well as of course their early and mid-life sadness.  For someone to be called “happy” is a cruel way of denying that they could have very real reasons for being sad.  

Similarly, a man who has spent decades and thousands of dollars trying to dress himself like a woman, speak in higher tones like a woman, do his hair like a woman, wear necklaces like a woman, get the best other female jewelry, etc. is insulted by the use of a word that implies he is transcendent with regards sexual matters.  In fact, sexual identity has consumed a much greater portion of his life than it has the lives of even the most consumerist of actual women.  

(How much time does the average woman worry that someone will see her 5 o’clock shadow and work to use makeup to conceal what never stops coming?  Being an effective trains without an eye-woman takes much more effort than being an actual woman.  Having a major surgery to be more like a different sex is being much more concerned with that sex than people who were born that way and don't have to have surgery for it.  Even when souls can be flashed onto the brain of the attractive template body chosen beforehand, that will still be a change indicative of the concept of "sex" being something to which trains without an eye people have devoted more thought and effort than people actually of that sex.)  

If he wishes to be called “she” and similar, that’s easy—as long as that person is not doing a formal thing that can be quite simple.  People can and do play along with that type of behavior.  What is not fine is implying through words that “her” lifelong quest to have perfect strangers think of “her” as her is meaningless; has been “transcended.”  The thing being supposedly transcended is the thing upon which the desire resides.  

Note how it being presented as good to be saved from matter--by a savior; a Christ--progresses naturally to such anti-material ridiculousness as TWAE issues.  It is ironic when a traditional Christian feels that something is wrong when men insisting they're women ruin women's sports--but feeling that an anti-matter rabbi has helped good people transcend matter is that exact thing!  Biological males insisting they are females is nonsense, but so is material beings saying they want to be saved from matter.  Jesusians realizing TWAE philosophy is nonsense should keep going and realize that Jesusianism is nonsense too.