All These Things

Why are all these things happening?  

If you investigate things that are happening and things that have happened you notice that large masses of people are recurrently driven toward self-destruction via unification.  In common parlance, you notice that people keep thinking that socializing resources is a good thing, and that the governments of people would operate better if they merged with other governments to become but one government.  This is what has been called the socialist phenomenon, the open conspiracy, or the new world order.  

Whenever attempts at making these combinations are enacted on a large scale, they produce people who are much less happy, societies which can get far fewer resources, societies that can produce far fewer finished products, and the awful killing of many people (depending on size, 17 might be a lot or 17 million might be a lot).  Even though this always happens, people keep trying to unify things.  They blame this, that, or the other for whatever they officially remember that went wrong, remaining committed to their sense that unifying things is good.  Why?  

People who consider these things tend to be of two types.  One type is those who don’t know about these types of problems.  They are driven to do what seems to be intentional concealing, but which is really just ignorance.  The second type knows that things have been very bad when unification happens, but still pursues unification.  Sometimes this is done because of a desire to get more skimanaged assets by adding more people to a unification, and sometimes it is done merely because the unifier mistakenly believes that correct unification will eventually lead to goodness.  So many belonging to the government(s) of the U.S.A. and much of Europe are committed to the idea that everyone should have a part in governmental control—democracy—and that resources should be regularly extracted from those who produce them and given to those who do not, namely that progressive taxation should be the law.  Among them can hide—like wolves in sheep’s clothing—those who want everyone to come together so that a much larger number of people can be skimanaged (“taxed”).  

Much of what we see today (2025) is people trying to argue against unification because they feel it is obvious that others do not want to be skimanaged.  Although they are correct, this is doomed to failure, because those others (not knowing it!) are decaying society, not trying to make it better for them (even though they think so).  This can be seen very clearly in the way that women (who obviously don't want to be raped!) argue vigorously against some leader's (say U.S. President Trump's) restrictionism that would keep them safe.  Like people of both sexes insisting in other words that they be taxed more in order to give things away to people who hate them and everything they like anyway (to give immigrants a chance), they are doing that because of the environment: they are causing decay to happen.  Believing that what they do is because of certain morals, they don't know what they are actually doing (and yes they're stupid but that's irrelevant to environments cycling groupings of humans).  

In Usica (The United States.  Notice the word “united,” similar to the terms universe, United Kingdom, or European Union, and the way that fantasies of unification tend to co-present with policies of taking things away from those who work and giving them away to other people, such as progressive taxation.  In addition, think of the way that the many provinces of Germany became, well, Germany, mirroring the way that societies worldwide have often unified because of conquest with the unification justified by similarity of language), and the frequently seen conflict over federalism v. states rights, as exemplified in the Usican Civil War.  

The idea of unity persists.  Even though the giant unity in Russia (the U.S.S.R.) did very badly and didn’t even last a century, people keep coming back—again and again—to the idea that if they just equalize everything, it will be good.  Why?  

Because what is happening is decay.  Many places on Earth are decaying.  It is happening right now; you can see it quite easily on the Internet: people trying to end the societies in which they live.  Their behavior doesn't seem to make sense, so concluding that they are stupid or ignorant can seem to be all you can do.  You are wrong, though.  They are not being stupid or ignorant.  They are trying to cause decay.  Even though they don't know that, they are doing that.  That is why, for example, a PhD in tripolinear equations (or a person who is in some other hypothetically smartness-requiring situation) can vigorously advocate for immigrants to her or his society even though in a few years one of those immigrants will beat that advocate to death and steal his house (for a few days, because he doesn't know the cops can figure out whose house it really is--that violent thief has high time preference so he has an enjoyable few days unassailed by concerns about tomorrow, much like someone not paying his mortgage and devoting the resources instead to hoznshee).  

The people who cause decay often say—and can even themselves believe within the privacy of their own heads; genuine belief—that they are advocating “progressing” or similar, and would insist that what they want to be done will not hurt a society but will improve it.  They are of course wrong, but unbeknownst to them, what they are doing is very bad in the short term (but good and right in the long term, because if environments did not change, then those environments would be dead.  The cycle of new countries tending to be more nationalistic and conservative, and of people tending to grow more conservative as they age, has environmental explanations that are not available to philosophies of individualism).  

There are no liberals on Pluto, so it is ironic--one of the many ironies of existence--that you really, really want to be around liberals.  In fact, you would die if you weren't able to be around them (If you're not sure about that, take a trip to Antarctica and spend a few nights outside without clothes.  See?  You very much want to be around liberals).  The only way that environments can exist is if they sometimes grow, sometimes shrink, sometimes develop, sometimes decay…decay means that society ending, which means a lot of people trying to destroy that society while believing they are helping it.  

People, being components of their environment, are driven seemingly inexplicably to decay.  It is a narcissistic flattery when people believe that they have developed minds and thoughts on their own (that they are “independent” thinkers).  How they think is actually a component of the environment of which they are part.  No, that doesn’t mean that low test scores are caused by some bad family situation, cultural prejudice, etc.  Rather, it means that how minds work—how people can think—is not independent the way people like to flatter themselves.  Human societies get born, grow up, age, senesce, and die.  That is part of the natural cycle of environments (and they most often do that on planets, which orbit around stars which get born, grow up, age, senesce, and die, within galaxies, which get oops scale sorry).  It admittedly is quite bad to live within a human society that is decaying, but if societies didn’t decay, then new ones would never be born, never be able to grow, people could never live in them, and it would be really bad.  

So, when a bunch of idiots are clamoring for unification, more progressive taxation, etc., what they are doing is being components of their society.  Them being idiots—them believing that the things they say should happen are going to be good for them—is of course wrong, but is good from a larger perspective (i.e. it will cause very bad things to happen in 20 years, but new societies will pop up in maybe 120 years).  When production in their society drops, when horrible things happen to people, it is bad in the short term (like, “less than a thousand years” short), and it is misperceived when people conclude that those ideas are good (in the context within which they believe it is good), but it is very good (within a larger context; like “more than ten thousand years”) when a society breaks up so a new society can form.  

Think of how poop smells bad and healthy people do not want to be around someone going poop.  However, if nice food could not be made that included many components that had to be discharged from the body, it would be bad (think of some very tasty dessert you like and how bad it would be if all desserts could never be eaten).  Therefore, poop is actually a good thing, even though you do not want to be around it.  It is good if you have some wonderful piece of dessert, and if someone is using the bathroom on the other side of the planet while you eat that dessert, who cares.  That is a good process.  The result of the process is good desserts and poop.  

Thus with decay.  Every single attractive person you have ever seen—if you’re what is called a “straight” man, often every pretty woman ever, or fine just that one special one you love—only could exist because every little cell making up that person’s body passed through a process of change which we call decay.  Decay is a good thing.  So is growth, maturity, death, birth, and so on—all of those things are part of the pieces of change in time that we call life (and it is fair, it is just fine, if you like or dislike, or become emotional, about those things.  That is life, and the way people think/feel about those things in the way that the effects of the passage of time on bodies relates to time is a different subject that touches on how the way you yourself think--how your mind works--depends on the environment you inhabit).  

Seeing the idiocy of people saying, acting like, and wholly, truly believing that doing things which cause decay will cause a society to improve rather than deteriorate can lead one to think that decay is bad.  Like some evil person tying you up and rubbing poop on you, it would be extremely unpleasant.  However, poop itself is not that hypothetical evil person—it is not a bad thing—it is a good thing.  In the same way, parts of aging from 70 to 90 are often not enjoyable, but aging from 10 to 30 often is.  If the former ended the latter it would be very bad to end aging because you think the process of aging a bad thing.  

Every attractive person ever would have remained just a child if aging were prevented.  Depending on the time aging were stopped, every such person would remain just a baby.  Would not even have been born because her or his parents would never have conceived her or him—never have become fertile.  

All of these things happen, and to be able to think about them can easily confuse a person.  The breakdown of societies, the ending of a society’s ability to produce resources, and of course the massacre of very many people, tend to make people think that decay is a bad thing.  This seems a self-evident conclusion, and particularly the deception used in killing many people, breaking down societies, and so forth can seem to make decay a bad thing—a foul happenstance.  However, it should be remembered that this deception, breaking down, and killing happens in the context of the cycling of environments, and is therefore a good thing.  

By all means, avoid being right by a toilet while someone goes poop.  Do not sniff eagerly at the poop, lick it, or pick it up and rub it on your face.  However, it is good that that thing happens.  That is how something can be both a good and a bad thing.  It is the same way a car can be a fast thing when it is being driven but a stable thing when it is parked.  This seems to make a strange contradiction: decay is a foul thing around which you don’t want to be, but is a thing that you want to happen.  All of the parts of the planet Earth itself, like a very attractive, very clean mate, were only available because of decay.  Stars that supernovaed long ago created and dispersed the heavy elements that are now found on Earth.  That very attractive, very clean person only was born because every single component of that person’s body (at any given time) was once something like humus.  Some of that humus was before that poop.  As completely as you do not want to take a bite of a turd, you are glad that every nice thing you have ever liked came to be, thus you are completely a supporter of decay.