Darn Voldemortists!

One of the saddest + dumbest bad habits of Jesusians is that they view the professed adherence to the antagonist of their preferred fictional narrative as actually motivated by that character.  Their need for the fake story that is really a genetic attack in disguise (disguised as an incredibly stupid philosophy designed for stealing away all the nice/food things their genes produce and assigning them to non-Whites) is stupid, yes, and sad for that.  However, sad in addition to dumb is why the example of the Voldemortists highlights what is dumber about traditional Christianity.  

What is the example of the Voldemortists?  Well, everyone agrees, right, that the Harry Potter series is fictional?  Voldemort is the admittedly fictional bad guy in that.  In the same way that Voldemort is a fictional bad guy pertaining to that particular set of stories, Satan has that role for Jesusians—this fictional bad guy who is opposed to the fictional good guy (Jahweh/Yahweh/Jehovah/Jesus of the maternally virginal fame).  Saying that Voldemort is real, or that Harry Potter is real, because someone does a bad thing and says he did it because of Voldemort, is the example of the Voldemortists.  Who would be deceived by such nonsense into saying that Harry Potter and Voldemort are surely real?  Sadly, very many people are actually vulnerable to deceit like that!  

Like Jesusians, hypothetical Voldemortists (unfortunately the others are very much real, not hypothetical) would not actually believe in the bad guy character, which character's fictional bad (the made-up shit that character is said to have done) demonstrates is a bad character.  However, unlike Voldemortists, Satanists (people who say that they act for Satan) do horrible things, and ascribe their actions to the service of their chosen fictional character.  So too claimed Jesusians.  When some pedophile priest sexually abuses however many little boys and then says he has been forgiven by an invisible man in the sky to whom he spoke via imagining words inside his head, he is a very dangerous pervert.  500 A.D. to 1500 A.D., such people had a lot of misbegotten (and incredibly gross, but you're now supposed to say something about preference) orgasms.  At some point a few hundred years later (sick sic) that became called wrong (people proud for saying "Christ is King!"' in contravention of modern idiocies about D.E.I. fraud should reflect about how they are saying they support over a millennia of the worst active pedophiles imaginable.  Normal, healthy Europeans wanted to give their kids vocational ed, but gay priests wanted to impose coerced community funding of liberal arts while touching some of the little boys' private areas.  It supports utterly depraved/wrong acts to support S.R.).  However, it remains too difficult for many Jesusians to decipher the very simple relationship between a sole male demiurge and what they call homosexuality.  As with them thinking that reverence for a Middle Eastern rabbi will save Europe and Deep European people, they have incredible blinders.  

So, the Voldemortists.  Many Satanists do really bad things and say it is for Satan, while on the other side many Jesusians do really good things and say it is for Jesus.  For people who prefer to get nice things now in return for eternally being hurt by a sadist in red pajamas inside a too-hot-forever big cave with a fiery background, they prefer Satan.  By contrast, people who prefer to spend eternity having a caring man make sweet and tender love to them on a super king bed with clean white sheets in a nice grassy background with temperate climes prefer Jesus.  (People who think both of those things sound bad and want to end up with Aphrodite or something else like that don't have a formal religion.  Good grief people; even the Islamaniacs get at least five ladies but Christianity is so massively gay it doesn't even promise that.  Okay, so maybe some woman can want Jesus; that's her issue.  Islamic guys are crazy, yeah, but at least they are fighting for imaginary stuff about five virgin sex-slaves.  If a guy, though, wants to spend forever with a loving man, then OH WOW LOOK OVER THERE A YELLOW CAR!)  

See if you can look at these acts of Jesusians and Satanists and figure out what the problem is.  

Satanist Actions

Raping and otherwise sexually abusing a lot of underage people;

Sexually stimulating themselves in secret while making gross/weird mixes of semen, urine, and blood, then having sicko rituals where they take shots of that ew junk before throwing the rest out;

Wearing weird dark-themed costumes with more drapey fabric than they really need; 

Building creepy underground tunnel networks that they use to conceal enslaved little kids and their own sicko orgasm-rooms; 

Saying that the sicko stuff they do is in service to some invisible man no one has ever once even seen.  

Jesusian Actions

Raping and otherwise sexually abusing a lot of underage boys;

Sexually stimulating themselves in secret while making gross/weird mixes of sink water, then having weird rituals where they take shots of that and then pour the rest down the drain or maybe water the plants;

Wearing weird light-themed costumes with more drapey fabric than they really need; 

Building creepy underground tunnel networks that they use to conceal enslaved little kids and their own sicko orgasm-rooms (look up the castrati if you think only Satanists do that kind of thing); 

Saying that the sicko stuff they do is in service to some invisible man no one has ever once even seen.  

Now, what could possibly be wrong with Satanists?  There are two possibilities.  Here they are: 

1) An invisible first century rabbi made the whole world.  That rabbi also had a mysterious plan where he made this divine person who is totally against him doing evil things.  Those who serve the latter do evil things.  

2) The Abrahamic religions include depictions of an evil divine person who can be vocalized as a representation of why bad people do bad things.  

The answer is 2.  When bad people do bad things, they sometimes find it dramatic to claim they did those bad things because of Reason XYZ, which makes them feel linked to other people who have done that type of bad thing and also claimed they did it because of Reason XYZ.  It takes someone as stupid as a Jesusian to believe that there is any relationship whatsoever between (1) above being real and those bad people perpetrating bad actions.  There is certainly a greater predilection for people affected by Jesusianism to seek homoerotic orgasm; the fact that Satanists occasionally abuse underage females too, while Jesusians are (almost?  Totally?  Non-media evidence says exclusively) exclusively homoerotic.  I.e. vicars like choirboys THAT way eww.  

As can be seen if you think about it, Abrahamic religions are strongly associated with terrible things, rather than the cause of good or evil things.  600 priests and nuns tend gardens for 30 years and feed the hungry which they say they did because of Christ: Christ doesn't exist, but they've done a good thing.  60 very gross priests touch little boys' private areas and then think really hard for many days about if an invisible man will forgive them: Christ doesn't exist, but they've done a bad thing.  60 very gross Satanists touch little boys' private areas and when they get caught they say they were acting for Satan: Satan doesn't exist, but they've done a bad thing.  60 very gross Voldemortists…well, thankfully that hasn't happened yet and probably never will.  

If you are deceived into thinking a first century official wise man from the Middle East means everyone should immigrate into Europe because people are all the same, then that character's nemesis is having its minions do evil things as part of his thought to be anti that rabbi.  If not--if you have a mind strong enough to operate without imagining that rabbi being real--then bad people just like associating bad things they do with a history of bad people trying to justify bad things.  

The anti-rabbi had nothing whatsoever to do with Usican school prayer or abortion; in fact, he didn't exist at all.  There is a correlation between organizations of bad people doing bad things saying they did those things because of that character, but that is just lip service.  It doesn't mean anything.  To the many Jesusian men, who pray to be close to a loving man, it doesn't mean that loving man is real!  He's fake!  You wanting to be close to him is a little WOW THERE'S A BLUE CAR!  

Anyway, if someone bad does something and said/acted like they did that bad thing on the behalf of an imaginary character, it doesn't mean that YOUR imaginary character from the same franchise is real.  It just means that someone bad is saying something.  If you want to listen to that person, to treat their ramblings as a reason to say you believe things without evidence that those things are real, that is one thing.  If you want to do that because you want to be close to a special man, that is another thing.