Evolution Beginning

See, the thing about Jesus is—oh, right.  Blogging. 

Many humans (particularly Usicans) are shocked and/or amused by records of the Scopes Monkey Trial, or other occurrences of Usicans (U.S. people) denying that biological evolution has occurred rather than creationism.  What those people were/are doing—the antagonists in the story of the Scopes Monkey Trial; in insisting that Jesusian creationism is true—are usually lampooned as some kind of aberrant, old-fashioned type of crazy people exhibiting a behavior in which modern, educated humans do not engage.  However, it is recurrently engaged in by rich, powerful, famous, educated etc. modern people.  Just as the imagination of epicycles was insisted upon by purportedly intelligent and freethinking people preferring to believe in universalism, Scopes Monkey Trial-type defenses of universalism are commonly exhibited by humans.  Very modern, very learned, purportedly very intelligent denial of evolution and reinforcement of preferred stories are quite normal for humans.  Such behavior is and has always been Christian.  

Evolution is a very difficult topic to consider, because the dramatic fixed fight of Jesusianism going down and Bangism going up--the details of how bad the loser is, which are given so that the ridiculous winner will look better and the ridiculous emptiness not get noticed--have been metaphorically pounded into the heads of generations of children.  People who were educated under Bangist rubrics have learned to stay away from that sacred cow--questioning the official narrative of random mutations means you're officially dumb.  As mentioned before, Jesusians, correctly perceiving some of the impossibility of things having randomly mutated, a few cells at a time, to be perfectly suited for Earth, can turn against Bangism and stay mostly in traditional Savior-ianity.  However, neither side knows how and why so many microscopic cells in so many different species worked out perfectly.  Jesusian Christians attest that their rabbi did it in six days six thousand years <OTHER>, and Bangists attest that their non-anthropomorphic non-deity deity (sic) Randomus did it (i.e. that it just turned out to match perfectly through luck, which is not just a little bit impossible but gigantically so--stay tuned).  

Think of yourself and what you believe.  You probably think (even if you’re Jesusian; if so you probably just think that was how S.R. did it and the six days crap was metaphor, although you might've gotten taken in by some op trying to make opposition to the U.S.-area Deep State look like Jesusian dumbasses--consider how Christianity has always used itself to oppose itself to put on distracting WWFs for useful idiots) that the story of evolution via the survival of the fittest (evolution by Randomus or creation by Jesus; choose your poison) changes that turned out better (or Jesus-made changes where he knew it would work).  When you do that, remember that people did that same thing in the past.  They thought it was now, it was modern times, people were closer to the Christ who had made everything, and so on.  So, what you think is not a new thing, but a thing that has been done before.  The delusional fantasy that the changing of cells which we call evolution is done randomly is just as wrong as that it is done by an invisible, omnipotent rabbi.  

Being faithful, rather than believing in accordance with evidence, is not a strange, rare, old-fashioned thing confined to the annals of history.  Rather, it is the way White people now behave.  Such behaviors are frequently engaged in by White people who deny that they are Christian (think modern liberals, responsive not to evidence but to maxims and "experts"); ones who are completely sure that they are not that way, and who would be hostile to the idea that they are Christian.  They believe exhibiting an understanding of Jesus being an anthropocentric fantasy about a sky person who did not actually exist makes them not Christian.  But, the educated modern idea about evolution is just as Christian as the ideas lampooned.  

Christianity is not just a story about some rabbi named Jesus Savior; it is savior-ity, a political argument about egalitarianism; a story about universalism being true; a philosophical system about it being good to be separate from the real world.  The character of the one who can save people from the nasty real world—Jesus—has been incredibly popularized, but saying you like that particular character is not by itself savior-ity.  

The insistence on the Out of Africa theory—the willful, obstinate refusal to acknowledge the evidence of humans living in Asia many tens of thousands of years prior to when they supposedly left Africa—is the same thing.  In this case, the flattering nature of the “we’re so modern and educated!” will be an unseemly relic if an empirical society exists on Earth years from now.  

(People back in the 1300s thought they were smart, too.  They had proof of that, because they knew lots of things those crazy old kooks living in the 1100s didn't.  People back in the 600s thought they were smart, too.  They had proof of that, because they knew lots of things those crazy old kooks living in the 400s didn't.  People back in 2025 thought they were smart, too.  They had proof of that, because they knew lots of things those crazy old kooks living in 1825 didn't.  And so on.)  

By the same token, the insistence on the correctness of Genesis 2.0 (v. Genesis 2.001794?) is the same.  The willful, obstinate refusal to respond to astronomical observations of galactic clusters that would have taken many dozens of billions of years longer to form than permitted by the Big Bang “Theory” is the same.  Official pronouncements of the deceptive power of evil Sin-Lord Satan (in modern expression, the deceptively installed fossil record or the never-found virus) are this.  The ennobling of various other non-evidenced, faith-based concepts in other disciplines are legion.  

As time goes on, and people develop different perspectives on time, illusions can and do adapt.  Numbers that we currently think very reasonable and realistic, and ones that we currently think absurdly large, will be differently viewed later.  What was once 7000 years ago became 20 billion years ago; 20 billion can just as easily become 80 quadrillion and then four octillion as Christianity adapts.  

(Remember that all Christianities are not about Jesus, but are about christ, i.e. a savior who may be a personified concept or may be just saying/thinking the concept is good, i.e. salvation i.e. separation from the material world.  Saying you like the particular savior personified as “Jesus”—Jesusian Christianity—is not all Christianity.  Christianity is a very effective soteriological plague that has helped decay get a foothold because of the vulnerability of stupid people [White people] to it.)  

Early Christians saw mountains that had taken many millions of years to form, and later Christians have seen galactic clusters that took many dozens of billions of years to form.  The delusion that “God made the mountains 7000 years ago” is very similar to “the Big Bang made all the stars 10-20 billion years ago.”  Bitter hostility has been used to marginalize that evidence when ignoring troublesome facts does not suffice.  However, the incredibly powerful drive of White people—the need, like that of the proverbial addict for drugs—for a story of universalism is such that utterly ridiculous things can be maintained for a very long time.  Jesusian Christianity has surely demonstrated that.  That is why groups of matter that would have taken much longer than allowed by any preferred universal beginning story are marginalized or not mentioned at all.  

“Daddy, why are there mountains?”  

“Well, Junior, Jesus made them.”  

Ridiculous, yet it is how White people act.  

The oft-seen notion that “all human beings came from the Middle East” is Christianity: savior-ity; egalitarianism/universalism.  It is not true, anymore than it is true that S.R. lives up in the sky, but it resonates with the brains of White people, and it is very popular among them just like S.R. was.  Sacrosanct stories like Out of Africa, though disproven, are just more universalism.  That is why, if early human remains are found in Asia or Europe, not in Africa, they are marginalized or not mentioned at all.  Officially smart people can spend decades acting like those things don’t exist; can base entire careers and lines of inquiry on the premise that those things do not exist.  This is not a new thing; it is a normal White thing.  

The government of China, being far less (or even not at all) filled with disingenuous idiots as other widely known governments, is the only reason that some archaeological finds of ancient humans in that country are allowed to be known.  Archaeological finds of ancient humans in countries governed by White people are likely to have a survival rate equivalent to that of Europeans who did not feel like worshiping the S.R. in ^AD500.  

There were lots of other telescopes before Galileo.  In addition, there was knowledge of all those planets being up there (people named “Jupiter” a god because they could see the friggin’ planet!).  Even so, officially smart geocentrists worked for decades!  What is happening now is what White people have always done.  Like the previously very popular Jesusian story of mud-sculpting, such theories are not true, but are still very popular.  

That is also why cosmologists are wrong in their assumptions that other fields of study are not as illogical as their own.  If proto-human remains are discovered in China, such discoveries conflict with the preferred story of proto humans having developed in Africa.  The same thing happens when are observed galactic clusters which would have taken in excess of 50 billion years to form.  

Dramatic popular stories about journalistic sensations or historical events for which there is no evidence continue to be popular.  The manufacture of consensus is another creation of a Christian community.  Like S.R.-worshipers not being stopped by the flight of the space shuttle proving that an invisible rabbi is not living up there, the pursuit of nonsense continues.  Even a wholly global network of satellites taking pictures, which network has become so common and cheap that it is free, did not destroy the Jesusian version of Christianity.  All fields of human inquiry, not only one or a few, are still Christianized.  

Continued in Evolution First.