The Difficulties of Christianity

Having developing males eliminate reverence of femininity and instead revere a man in very little/no clothing is "gay," and it is no surprise that the men who promised to devote their lives to thoughts of a male and never be physically intimate with a female built a much-deserved reputation of committing "sexual abuse" (orgasm-seeking physical behavior) of young males.  However, traditional Christianity's "gayness" is not limited to fostering homoeroticism; Christianity is purely antilife, so a direct attack on the genitals of the non-consenting--infants, often even newly born--is explicable.  

Men Stealing Femininity

Consider the many attacks on children, rationalized by stories of a life-creating Father (solo man) on European understandings of Mother (Mother Nature; a female nurturing life).  Relevant here are castrati.  This was the homoerotic child abusers of the Church, for over a thousand years, performing cosmetic genital mutilation upon what would grow into the pervs' choice slaves--male infants.  In the case of boys who were castrated, this is pervs (who don't SAY they're pervs, of course) cutting off, without anesthesia even, the testes (balls) of male infants in order to officially produce different vocalists for the choir.  In actuality, making baby boys less likely to develop male characteristics is what pedofags rather homoerotic child-sexual-molesters expressing their hidden fantasies do with Trains Without An Eye "gender care" now: an attack on Mother Nature, on the way humans are made.  Like female and male infant genital mutilation ("cutting" or "circumcision," respectively) the practices represent Christianity in its more vulgar form: people, even the parent(s) of that infant, changing the way that the genetic code provides for people to be in an often extremely painful way that causes permanent loss.  

Of course, the people concerned about attacking a baby's genitals often have disgusting motives.  FGC ("Female Genital Cutting"; the preferred term after the term FGM, or Female Genital Mutilation, was decried by some very sick, some very evil, people aware that the wording matters a lot--consider again the common practice of calling the existentially devoid, often extra-sad population a variant of "happy," such as "gay") makes the friction-giving passage tighter, thus women can defend the mutilation of their babies by arguing that future husbands prefer tighter women.  (If you're not familiar with FGM/FGC, what they mean is that by cutting off the labia and other parts they produce a tighter vagina.)  Catholic priests, who would never say they want to eff those boys while imagining another man, a special man, watching them from above, were drawn to castrati for the same reason.  The strange, doesn't-make-a-lick-of-sense-otherwise recurrence of cosmetic genital mutilation is explicable if one considers the great lengths to which pervs will go to orgasm in their desired sicko way.  Seeing today's rich, powerful, public-policy-making pervs have pedophile organizations can help you understand that history included rich, powerful pedophile organizations doing things that changed continents.  

The Goodness of Jesusianism

As we said in Toxic Jesusianism, very many Europeoids have very many good reasons to think that traditional Christianity is a good thing.  Traditional Christianity has served as a means of resistance, an intersection of goodness and freedom, and so forth.  It is not surprising to see Europeoids, even today, think that it is not only reasonable but good to feel that you should love the idea of an invisible, omnipotent rabbi living in the sky.  There exists ample evidence that very, extremely, even totally bad people and organizations have done maybe, probably, even explicitly anti-Christian things.  

However, it should be remembered that none of those things means there is an invisible, omnipotent rabbi living in the sky.  The false dichotomy set up to trick good, intelligent humans into thinking that they have proof that there is an invisible, omnipotent rabbi living in the sky has been--and still is--very effective.  Many people say you should love/support the idea of a Sky Rabbi not knowing that they are utterly betraying their ancestors who lived happily in a 0% tolerance of immigration 0% tolerance of orgasm-inspiring-child-abuse Europe.  Those people, those societies, were compelled, one by one, to start letting in immigrants, forgiving child-rapists, changing their law codes in other ways to make it understood they were subsidiaries to the Ten Commandments, and worshiping a foreign wise man no one had ever met, let alone seen.  (The way that the Black Sea flood served as inspiration for the Deluge in the story of Gilgamesh, which was plagiarized into the story of Noah, is here instructive.  In the same way, self-glorifying lies, like those big buildings in Egypt having been said to be in the fake stories made by someone else, were used to misdirect the praise.  Hammurabi's Code was transmogrified into Moses' code.)

Again, if S.R. is real, cosmigasmed into the sky to make reality, and so forth, maybe you want to be close to Him--that's your business, but good grief, please shut the door first, then take a long shower, and use pumice on your crotch and butt--if He is real, that's one thing.  Even so, the described character is a serial killer of children, prone to murderous narcissistic rages, and so forth.  Do your gross thing if you have to, but Jahweh should be gone.  

In reality, stories about the "Father" were promoting homoeroticism, mass murder, and other transmaterial things, such as ethnic heterogeneity.  The universalism of Jesusianism (cosmigasm; Adam/Eve; Noah's family) is that.  Christianity always has been a "leave the door open 'cause we're all the same!" ideology.  That is why your ancestors knew it was a bad idea.  It was destructive to open up Europe to immigration, and you might be seeing lately that they had the right idea.  Praising the Torah 2.0-inspired immivasion is a very bad thing, and claiming that Torah 2.0 is good for Europeoids just because that is better than Torah 3.0 (and it is, duh, but Torah 2.0 was how this started!) is a terrible betrayal of whatever suffering through which went your forebears when they tried to keep immigrants out of Europe.  Saying you love Jesus now is like being a person holding out a sign reading "Refugees Welcome!"  Did you have a girl ancestor who got gang-raped by Middle Eastern immigrants espousing a religion for all, or was he a 60-year-old soldier who died fighting invaders?  Did she have to marry one of those ugly moneychangers to appear down with the cause, or did he get really lucky and stay in the back room, never coming out until it was all over?  We don't know.  However, when you forget everything and say eagerly "Christ is King!" your betrayal is immense.  

A person advocating for her or his own destruction makes no sense unless you increase the size of your time scale.  It exhibits how the way people think is not a function of their individuality--their selfish genes or their relationship to S.R.--but that it is caused to happen by their environment.  That is Christianity: a function of decay.  An anti-material philosophy--remember "Christ" means "savior"--a world-rejecting religion, Christianity is quite literally people behaving in a way that causes their environment to cycle.  The assumption that people are acting out of ignorance, combined with their immunity to evidence, also combined with your firsthand seeing them behave perfectly rationally at other times, are thus very simple; very easy to understand.