Fighting Grendel

There Is Now a Battle

Many can believe that there is no great battle, and that there'll maybe never be a great battle.  They lament that things are wrong somehow, that people are ignorant, and Ye Olde man or storybook man had real monsters to fight, while now idiots are just confused and things are spoiled.  

However, they are wrong.  There is a battle, it is right now happening, and it is a tough battle where the idea that there is no battle is just a battle technique.  Some are being tricked so much that they are not even participating in the battle.  

It's Happening

Battling against some tough monster is a simple story, and a suitable raison d'être for many humans, particularly males.  What is tough to understand is that there is such a monster, the battle is right here now happening, and that being unaware of it is a technique of the enemy.  

Think of Grendel, one of the enemies of Beowulf, used to convey to generations of young men how they had to fight and beat some baddy in order to earn home and hearth, love and family, and all the other associated nice things about which it is considered impolite to discuss, like the part of the female anatomy alluded to by the term for cat starting with a P.  Reflect here on how people didn't believe Beowulf really existed, mention him in some meeting to make a point because they were worshiping him, and so on.  The Christian claims that the conquered tax-cattle of Europe were worshiping gods in whom they believed the way you had damn well better say you believed in Jesus has eliminated however many characters we'll never know, and made many generations of people believe that some other version of Beowulf was something in which people actually believed.  

Homoerotic Subversion

Female humans being desired for physical intimacy by male humans is a very basic component of the survival of meiotic organisms such as humans, utterly foundational, like "eat food or else die."  The anti-life strike on that can be seen in the trains no eye variety of attack on material concepts.  This is a more developed version of the "savior" attack; Bangist Christianity just progressing from Jesusian Christianity, where trying to get young males to focus not on an attractive female goddess but instead on a writhing male god, is the same sort of replacement.  The immense gayness of Legacy Christianity is this.  Modern Jesusians tend to be very hostile to this, refusing to consider any connection from "freed from matter gay things" (liberal gay rights) and "saved from matter monotheism" (Christian family values).  

Remember that traditional Christianity was the beginning of the flood--there were indeed more values of healthy, reproducing families, however the egalitarianism of Jesus was the beginning of the immivasion; the start of the destruction of Europe.  Before the invasion of rabbi-worship, there were better values of healthy, reproducing families, and healthy behavior that went along with it, such as that young men were supposed to think about shapely women instead of about men.  

(Think about how lust was a sin, i.e. Christianity was literally antilife in that it tried to repress men wanting physical intimacy with women.  That drive--lust--is directly from Mother Nature, like unto the human infant's drive to suckle.  It is as about life as anything can be.  The "don't get married, spend your time thinking about a divine man instead" fits with that.  As married women get jobs now as official liturgizers of this or that Jesusian denomination ("priests"), and the earlier Jesusian opposition to gay rights is trumpeted, the methinks they are doth protesting too much about treating men's u++holes like women's privates tends to be entirely missed, and the sentiment taken seriously despite the fact that a man's poop-hole is not at all like a woman's vagina.  It is unfortunate when people seeing that trains no eye stuff is sick and wrong, and trying to resist that, are tricked into forgetting Deep European culture and thinking that their history is the anti-material philosophy that started that very badness against which they want to be.)  

After the imposition of rabbi-worship, there still existed more of what was there before than still survives  in 2025, but attributing that remaining goodness to an earlier stage of the anti-material-philosophy that was a slow poison destroying that goodness is wrong.  The supplantation of those values is why it is so noxious when Deep European people nowadays act like those family values were something helped by the figurehead of the stories of the invasion of Europe being good.  It is like if, 1000 years from now, Deep European people were saying that Western culture was founded by trains no eye rights movements.  

It should be here noted that Jesusian Christianity's "gay rights" was massive.  The replacement of cultural manifestations of tropes--figurines--of attractive female characters/goddesses with figurines of a then-naked now loinclothed man was incredibly gay.  Saying Amen! to that is harmful, like unto getting rid of Veteran's Day and replacing it with Pride Day.  If you are a man who really prefers Jesus to a goddess, that's your private business, and also ew.  Goddesses make for much better stories when you are a supporter of life.  When you prefer death, you want men to forget goddesses and focus on a man.  

This is the Battle

The monster being big, strong, having 100 tentacles, squinty eyes, etc., might make for a story, but that is a trick.  This is the battle, and the enemy is much tougher, much fouler, than that.  People who proudly think they embrace European tradition by wanting to be close to a man-god are merely the liberals of yesteryear, having utterly betrayed and forgotten the people who lived in Europe, their culture and traditions, for a long, long (more than 20 times bigger) time before the Christian invasion.  

Now, after Torah 2.0 took Europe, Torah 3.0 increases the infection on the West.  The people still in the West lament that there is no battle, but just as they have been deceived into thinking an earlier phase of the invasion will help them resist a later phase of the invasion, they are not seeing the actual battle.

How so?  Well, in the modern Beowulf, heroes have to beat not some scary beast who's really good at fighting, but ones that have deceived the heroes' own people--neighbors, countrymen, family, would-be friends, etc.--into thinking that the monster itself is good.  Whining that, "Oh, it's not fair!" and, "They're raping and looting!" is a really bad countermove.  The monsters have already planned for that.  

Grendel is Now Tougher

Over the years, the foul things that threaten hearth and home are much tougher than they are in the stories.  The modern Beowulf has to not just go on a journey and really kick ass, but deal with much tougher situations.  

The tricks against which said modern Beowulf battles are the façade of democracy--of the people having chosen things to be that way.  It is the same way that, when the Middle Eastern philosophy of rabbi-worship started being promulgated, false impressions of consensus were used to make people feel alone, and to not get why "so many people" had suddenly decided to believe a foreign official wise man had cosmigasmed everything into existence, was invisible and all powerful, etc.  Now, many years later, that has worked so well that many people don't even know what kinds of things their ancestors went through, and think that all goodness comes from that foreign official wise man.  

Democracy

Picking some big names, Trump, Biden, Carney, and Starmer did/are doing things that don't seem to make sense.  People seem shocked a majority decided their country should be given away to others, that their money should pay for that giving, and so forth.  However, majorities of people did not decide these kooky things.  There are a few squealing ninnies who would have, but not actual majorities.  Foul, lying soothsayers are common, and that is what they're like.  Wormwoods suck.  See how it's really bad when it's not just a story?  Like rabbi-worship has tricked many into forgetting European history from say 35K years ago to 1600 years ago, "democracy" has tricked many into believing "Well, everyone's just ignorant" when in actuality it means that the enemy is already inside the gates.  There is a correlation between "matter disavowal" and things like "no borders"/"femininity is a state of mind" that could have given away Jesusianism right at the start.  It is such a sad irony to see people trying to defend good things by embracing the poison given them by the enemies of good things.  

The old battle might have been about fighting some big monster, but the new battle is completely different.  Instead of your hearth and home being this safe, nice place for which you go fight, your hearth and home are themselves corrupted.  That is why this battle is much tougher than earlier battles.  Of course your hearth and home are hurting themselves; if some warrior's wife demands the right to drive nails into her own body, if some warrior's child insists that he is too a magic pink seal who can drink water that tastes best at the bottom of the ocean, them being wrong, being stupid, being crazy, etc. doesn't matter.  Maybe the guy across the street thinks you're the mean bad one for your illogical stances against erotic self-nailing and existential water-breathing.  

The question used to be much simpler, much easier: are you tough enough to beat the big baddie when everyone at home thinks you're great and supports you?  Now, it's a question much tougher: are you tough enough to beat the big baddie when everyone at home thinks you're bad and stymies you?  The world seems crazy, but it is just a harder version of the same battle: are you tough enough to fight Grendel?