Transvaal Gold
The Transvaal (yes, two As; it’s weird like that) had gold. For some reason that makes no sense whatsoever, Ists want to keep bringing that up. So I, Jesina, heroic revealer of their istist istism, shall expose them.
The primary problem with proving new extremely important stories of bad things happening without any evidence that those things ever happened (like the Passion of Jesus Christ) that Ists might say are a new Exodus is that there tends to be no evidence for what stupid doody-heads call “fictional.” Like the evidence for the Christian biblical story of the pyramid-building slavery in Egypt, the invisible man in the sky—who had created all existence in a single tight burst—had chosen someone in particular to own the world, and made the great suffering of Jesus. These stories told of great suffering, and it was not estimated that anyone could later find out that those things were not at all true.
(That is one of the ways that traditional Christianity is not a good way of creating/buttressing social cohesion. The Passion of the Christ is an example of how establishing and recurrently firming notions of fictional suffering makes the Jesusian population extremely vulnerable to a group that is inclined to saying it had great badness happen to it. If you can think of any such fiction, and how such a fiction could be monumentalized among a population already prepped for that with the infection of traditional Christianity--already venerating the story of the great suffering of the Passion; already thoroughly prepared to believe in fictional suffering for which there shall never be evidence it happened--then you can see why traditional Christianity was very bad for Europe.)
However, the falsities of the various religious texts were exposed. There was no paradise-garden from which two important people had been expelled for eating a special apple. In addition, there was a big flood in the vicinity of the Black Sea around BCE5600, but it was not a big flood covering the whole world. There was no evidence that a rabbi named Jesus had ever lived around Rome (nor been anywhere, and good grief Jesusians have really tried to find some proof). Airplanes were invented and built, followed by spaceships, and there was no invisible man watching from above in the sky, nor in space. It seemed that a certain type of people was prone to producing stories about bad things that were not in the slightest bit true (like the Passion of the Christ).
Note how the cosmigasm (Genesis/Big Bang), the paradise garden (Adam/Eve), the Deluge (Noah's Ark), were stories that reinforce the "common origin" of humanity, as well as how the fictional meanness of Adam/Eve being kicked out of paradise, and Noah having to survive such a flood, are suffering stories like unto the Passion. The Gospels is very much like the Torah, though it often masquerades as not being so: a compilation of stories of persecution that did not happen. Note also the fictional building of the pyramids and the Ark: the stories aren't just about fake persecution but fake construction.
There is never evidence for the stories of badness, but those stories become very popular. I.e. have you ever heard of the Bible?
The Bible
This absence of evidence has become very easy to explain, because, like the existence of a man in the clouds who wanted you to behave a certain way, it was never imagined at the time the story was first told that it could be proven wrong. Such is often the case, though increasing awareness of the study of history and of the advancement of technology leads to the crafting of better falsities.
That kind of story, like Jesus' Passion, gives an example. Stories of badness for which there is no evidence, or of having created extraordinary things, should be considered in light of their biblical counterparts. Moses Ten Commandments and Hammurabi's code are also a linkage: Moses got his even better code from S.R. on Mt. Sinai.
15 So Moses went up on the mountain, and the cloud covered it. 16 The glory of the Lord settled on Mount Sinai. For six days the cloud covered it, and on the seventh day the Lord called to Moses from inside the cloud. 17 To the Israelites, the glory of the Lord looked like a raging fire on top of the mountain. 18 Moses entered the cloud as he went up the mountain. He stayed on the mountain 40 days and 40 nights.
Exodue 24:15-18
If you say you believe in S.R., you can approach that one way, and if not you can think about it as a way someone heard about this set of laws and made up a story about an even better set of laws from this invisible friend. The way that human history has been shaped by the Bible, the way that so many people have ignored their history from say 35K years ago to 1600 years ago, and that they have done so because of popular stories, is horrifyingly indicative.
Back to Africa
So: Transvaal gold. Going on.
Usica and Great Britain had multiple specific reasons to want to believe that they had been very good in a war by fighting against someone very bad. Their deliberate targeting of civilians in the past was always horrible, akin to the way that N.A.T.O. wars now hit civilians and structures that are absolutely not military (the famous “U.S. bombing of a baby food factory in Iraq” story shows how ridiculous this gets after the year CE1990). However, there is a particular reason why the story of “bad concentration camps” resonated so well with the Allies. About CE1899 to CE1902, the British Army fought the Boer War, in which the British Army was used to seize control of the Transvaal gold mines near South Africa, where many European settlers had gone to live.
(The Boers lived in South Africa, and tried to make a country there, but if they’d gotten to do that, that would’ve meant them officially owning those gold mines and the avaricious British government did not want that. It is popular to recognize the ugliness of the South African "Kill the Boer" genocide in CE2025, but the Harry Potteresque massacre of Europeoids by the descendants of the killers of the Celts is generally forgotten, as are the other Celts all along the way to the British Isles, etc.)
Think of how the citizens of the U.S. are told the history of their successful revolutionary war against the much larger and more powerful British Army. By attacking, then receding and hiding, the Usican forces were able many times to defeat the British Army. The South Africans did the same.
In an attempt to force the Boer men to stop fighting, the British created concentration camps, then trapped and made prisoners out of the women and children those Boer men had left behind. Those men continued fighting and beating the British Army, so the British took things up a notch by torturing the women and children. More specifically, they cut the food to the many inmates of their concentration camps. This was not the kind of torture where a person pulls off someone’s fingernails with pliers but rather the kind where you put up walls, prevent a person from leaving the space inside those walls, and then stop giving them food to eat.
What the British did in the Boer War was horrible: they killed more than 20,000 non-combatants in their concentration camps. 20,000 is a very big number, so to conceal how horrible it was that they did that, a much bigger number of people dying in concentration camps had to be used. (Think of how a much bigger number was used to disguise the similarity between “everything was created in the Middle East 7000 years ago” and “everything was created in a Big Bang 10-20 billion years ago and then all humans came from Africa.”) “They were naughty people” or “they were combatants” did not work as lies, because there were women with babies and very young children in those camps. A lie about a bigger bad thing happening had to use a bigger number—preferably a much bigger number.
The British government had been incredibly, totally evil for doing the things it did to the Boer women and children in concentration camps. Cultural downplaying of the Boer War has occurred, such that most British, European, and Usican pre-university schools don’t even mention it. Later insulting of the Boers and Afrikaners as evil racists, and the breakup of the British Empire, is presented in this same light. The British did nasty things in their other colonies too, but did not for those places make official stories telling about how good the British were for giving up their colonies, and how racist were the European-blooded people left there.
Here note the pattern of insulting the victims commonly seen in Christianity. The Bangist "they liked Apartheid!" coverup of the mass murders of the Boers is like the "they were pagans!" nonsense used by the Jesusians long ago. If you can see the way official presentations of South African Apartheid and Boer genocides match with the non-presentation of concentration camps during the British attack on Transvaal, then you can think about how likely it was that you were told the real story about the way pre-Christian Europeoids lived and what those people believed.
Events after the horrible things the British Army did up to 1902 are portrayed to make it seem that the British Army is very good. Genuine very bad things that the British did in concentration camps during the Boer War came to form a part of later fictional narratives. The very proud officially designated educated people now who parrot propaganda are as currently celebrated as the supporters of the other religions. It can seem very noxious to watch them spew their compassion about whatever fictional badness, but remember that a thousand years ago their kind said that they were nobly murdering children for “denying the Christ.” It is normal—perhaps distressingly so—for White people to behave that way.
To make people in Russia stop trying to keep their things, in 1932 Stalin (and his henchmen, but just like Europeoids of yesteryear being involved in the Red Terror and Europeoids today happily supporting S.R., we're just going to say "Stalin" because he's responsible for any given henchman) sent armed men to seize stuff in farms, including machines and tools but most notably seeds. That means that, if farmers tried to keep their seeds, they got shot to death (and if people on those farms were women, you can probably guess what else happened to them). Without seeds, many places had no food. The people there got very hungry. When someone else felt bad for them and tried to send them food, Stalin found another use for his armed men: use them to keep anyone from sending food to those very hungry people.
That is the origin of the “Holodomor.” Stalin killed maybe “just” seven million people with the Holodomor, maybe 10 million, maybe more. In any case, it was a lot.
What is notable here is not what happened between those soldiers and the people on those farms, but that those happenings were later called things that had happened for the benefit of the people. No joke—they really were said to be things like that. Consider Stalin’s predecessor Lenin, who killed millions of people but maybe fewer than Stalin. Have you ever heard of the Russian Revolution, when Lenin was active? Is it said that communism is about an attempt to make the economy good, or that communism is about guys shooting starving people and raping women? Whyever could people be calling the occurrence of the second set of things a revolution? Like evolution, it's called random.
Not only the intense effort to memorialize things which did not happen, but that to forget things which did happen, characterize this epoch; this Christian era. The horrible greed and willingness to order terrible violence is conjoined to the attempt to get other people to focus humanity on a fake atrocity. Real atrocities feed on this. It is presented as an act of immorality to deny some fake bad thing happened, but in fact it is quite the opposite: to say that popular fake stories of bad things are not real is to encourage people to not commit real atrocities. In the same way that it would have been social destruction in the past to not focus on the huge fictional wrongness of what happened to Jesus Christ, it is so with preferred stories of fake badness today. Those stories are the same kind of stories: Jesus did not exist, he was not executed, and thinking you are very good appreciating how improper and cruel it was for those people to condone his cruci-fiction—more often called His crucifixion—is ridiculous behavior.
Saying any given fictional narrative of badness happened is not just being stupid: it is being immoral, because focusing on fictional badness is making a very small contribution to an actual very bad thing happening later.
One is required to pay taxes to fund a military which uses very complicated and very expensive weapons to mass murder babies. Therefore, it is not one’s decision, and is not to one’s moral detriment. When asked about fictional badness by a potential employer, discussing things as if the fictional badness were non-fictional is similarly not to one’s moral detriment. However, in the privacy of one’s thoughts, if one believes there was badness, such an exemption is not active in the sense of one’s character.
That is what limits the intelligence of Decay. They actually believe in the ridiculous stories that their predecessors have crafted.
Was the pharaoh really mean to the slaves whom in the famous biblical story he used to build his pyramids? Did Jesus Christ really suffer a lot on the True Cross? It’s all the same thing: narratives of fictional badness. “Oh being a slave sucked so hard I deserve your money” is very similar to “Oh having a god hurt me in the desert sucked so hard I deserve your money.” Which is also incredibly similar to “Oh being nailed to that cross sucked so hard I deserve your money.” The Bible is really just stories of bad things that never happened.
Ist ranting now ends. These kinds of horribly hateful rants are the kind of things Ists say. Those Ists are such Ists! Jesus is such a man, and every handsome men deserves to get nestled in His tender bosom! And there are great activities and prizes for the ladies too, and people who don't see that will go to Hell when they die instead of being held close by the sweet embrace of a man forever. It just makes no sense that every man wouldn't want that.
It must be remembered at every moment that I, Jesina, am not one of those bad Ists. My stuff is not Ist stuff. If you think these writings are expressing Ist viewpoints, you are a doody-head and a Nazi. It must be repeated: these hateful arguments are being presented so that they can be better countered. If it should happen that you become confused and believe that the Ist things written about here, which things are the majority of what appears here, are supported by one or more of the authors of this project, then, that is because you do not wish them to be countered effectively. These rantings might encounter people like that, who do not wish these writings to be countered, because they are Nazis filled with hate (sic).
Crazy Ist viewpoints (sic) have been presented here, because that is the only way for people to become familiar with them and to better counter them. Here is another thing I could say to you if you are a stupid Nazi (sic) who doesn’t want these kinds of crazy things countered (sic):
Thank you for your interest in Christianity Rules. It seems that you have been confused by the writing and have expressed your secret hopes that untrue, evil things are being said. However, we remind you that these things are only being said so that they can be better understood so that they can be better countered. Since you are obviously filled with hate and prefer the illogical notions described here for countering, we suggest you go somewhere else and join a Nazi party or some KKK-affiliate in your area. This kind of membership will allow you, and people like you, to be more efficiently liquidated by the good and pure-hearted citizens of the future world-state.
During World War: the Sequel, better known as WW2, the Prime Minister of Britain (Church Hill I mean Churchill) bought up massive quantities of rice upon which the much poorer people of India had been depending. This was 1942. Churchill then shipped the rice away from India to feed it to soldiers. As a result, over 2 million Indians starved to death. That was horrible, and was duplicating—on a much larger scale—the “kill by starvation” that the British had employed against the Boer (White) children and women of South Africa.
Returning to Ists, they say there are four big reasons for why stories of fictional badness (like the fake Passion of Jesus Christ) became so popular:
1) British concentration camps in the Boer War (1899-1902);
2)Holodomor (1932);
3) Indian famine (1942);
4) Deliberate targeting of German noncombatants during World War II (1939-1945).
There is so much passion about Jesus’ capital-P Passion when He took off everything but His loincloth and died just for us. I love telling that story, because when I was presenting as a man, I did this thing that should turn on I mean spiritually enrich any man. The story of Christ is so, soooo good.
You may feel a visceral reaction of moral affront at hearing popular but fake stories of badness (like the fake Passion of Jesus Christ) challenged. However, it should be remembered that the people who like to support stories of fake badness were actually killing millions of people. That is why ridiculous dramatic nonsense is so told. It is a very foul coverup, a distraction, of actual ki-HEY LOOK OVER THERE A BLUE CAR WOW LOOK LOOK LOOK THERE IS NO MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN YOU SHOULD LOOK FOR THE BLUE CAR YOU SHOULDN’T LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN OR YOU’RE A BAD PERSON!
People who want you to focus on the stories of fake stuff were shooting babies and grandmas, killing them to remove them to make space. Stalin had used his army to prevent hungry people—very hungry people; people literally dying of hunger—getting food aid. The British Army had put women and children in death camps where the British Army literally didn’t give them food so that they would hurt and die so that their men would get sad and let the British Army have the Transvaal gold mines. That same British Army had also taken all the rice away from a lot of very hungry people in India who needed that rice in order to not die. Making up fake stories about other death is not only dirty in and of itself, but is supporting the covering up of the Stalin regime killing at least seven million people; of covering up the ugly things the British Army did. If there were an imaginary, faith-based Death Star that had killed a lot of people, for it to not even have a bigger number than the lowest guess at how many real people died in the Holodomor (somewhere north of 7 million) is even meaner and dumber. Like the numbers given as years since Genesis and Genesis: 2 (a.k.a. the Book of Genesis and the educated story of the Big Bang), stories of fake suffering are just imagining a big number; a number big enough to get a lot of attention. It took other people years, later, to guess how many people had been killed in the Holodomor.
People with a modern “education” aren’t going to care that American and British generals deliberately targeted civilian areas with bombers in WW2. But at least the starving people in U.S.S.R. areas (Holodomor) and in India, the little kids in South Africa killed for gold, and the old ladies bulldozered in other places might mean something to some of them.
Remember that list:
1) British concentration camps in the Boer War (1899-1902);
2)Holodomor (1932);
3) Indian famine (1942);
4) Deliberate targeting of German noncombatants during World War II (1939-1945).
It is good that there is decay, but the process of decay is very bad to be around. Just like it is good that there is poop, but you do not want to eat poop, handle poop, be around poop etc., it can seem confusing.
Decay were built that way. It is what they do. Agents of decay cannot, nor do you want them to, behave differently.
This is why accepting that Christianity Rules is difficult. Many people who can perceive that Decay is happening are, ironically, claimed believers in the story that there is an omnipotent invisible rabbi in the sky. Others do not say they believe the story that there is an omnipotent invisible rabbi in the sky. They say that, but they manifest the same type of belief: a belief in universalism. Always they consider what they think now a much more reasonable and modern belief, a.k.a. monotheism replacing paganism followed by atheism replacing monotheism.
Decay can seem to be for genetic interest. All well and good, but what happens when 50, 100, more, years pass when Whites have been bred out? Decay will be dominant over gigantic hordes of “mixed race” heathens, but that means that everything will get dirty and break. Drastic punishments can be given to Decay’s subordinates. They can threaten them, flog them, hurt them in any conceivable way, bribe them, be nice to them, whatever, and those people still will not be able to produce nice new things or produce economic surpluses that can be skimanaged.
Comments
Post a Comment