Pre-Jesusian 2

Continued from Pre-Jesusian 1.  The transition of "good people do well-educated things by believing in concepts of connection for which there is no evidence because even if they are not themselves well educated they follow educated positions and are saved by S.R." to "good people do well-educated things by believing in concepts of connection for which there is no evidence whether or not they believe in old-fashioned godheads like S.R." is very like how Protestants wanted to sever themselves from the Catholic Church.  The exact same underlying belief in things without evidence persisted, and the particular aspect of the story changed, in the former place with random chance replacing Jesus and in the latter place with what Jesus said being, like the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings, reinterpreted so massively that it created precedent wholly un-conceived.  Was the Constitution created for the Founders' posterity?  Did Jesus say He would hold true in Heaven what the popes do on Earth?  In either case, developing Christianity decided the past was just fuzzily inclusive metaphor.  

Effectiveness of Christianity

The effectiveness of Christianity can be seen in particular, made relevant by contemplating the Christian response to the next invasion of Europe.  Ironically, Torah 3.0's conquest is resisted by many adherents of Torah 2.0, who have utterly forgotten what their forebears went through in trying to keep Torah 2.0's dangerous pro-immigration, egalitarian nonsense (sic sick) out of Europe.  It is like if Europeans in a hypothetical CE3025 advocated for protection against invaders by saying "Allahu Akbar!" and keeping the love for Allah in their hearts as they believed did the founders of the nations of Europe.  

The French Wars of Religion (1562-1598) and the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648) killed many people, along of course with the initial Protestant Revolution.  Viewed one way, those were people very passionate about worshiping S.R. properly.  When viewed differently, it was a very effective way for people who wanted to hurt Europe and kill a lot of Europeans to do so.  Who could possibly be so vile and so cunning?  You may find it instructive to consider that question alongside the official stories of the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent U.S. military activities in Afghanistan and Iraq.  

On the subject of wars over Christianity, imagine that aforementioned conflicts killed 5 million people.  Imagine that those people hadn't been infected by Christianity, and instead'd had kids, those kids'd had kids, etc., and those people had then voted for nationalist parties in 2024 or stopped the New Deal/Comintern invasions of Europe in WW2.  See why Christianity was a very effective ideological weapon?  Even in 2025, the message of universalism is extremely powerful.  

Not Really Opposition

Protestants who strove to free Europe from the globalist universal church ended up being just another group of man-worshipers where a much higher than average proportion of the male officials touched little boys in homoerotic ways.  This kind of severance—the pretense that you are against something by doing the same thing—is much like the way liberal and conservative political parties serve the same ends while pretending to be different from one another.  

The deception here helps us understand why early Christians claimed that they had conquered early pagans who had literally believed in god-characters, i.e. people who were like them.  This kind of behavior from people who say they are saved from or freed from matter is normal.  A healthy young man killing people for S.R. (who as we all know loves peace clang clang) is exhibiting the same sort of murderous irony as a healthy young man making sure a bomb is launched at this scientific facility that researches weapons across from some playground that unfortunately got hit.  

Because the most widely known old religions had godheads with desires, today faithful view it as a mark of progress that they have no religion.  After all, they say, religions involve godheads.  Frequently yes, but as we’ve seen, religion is about the veneration of abstract concepts, which concepts may or may not be personified via a godhead.  The morose emptiness of the disillusioned now is such a set of concepts, and personifying it as Lord Randomus is only done for illustration, for it is the nothingness cowardly worshipers revere.  

Think of the way that people anthropomorphize anthropomorphism.  Anthropomorphism is the attribution of human-like characteristics to a thing which is not human, but many Bangist Christian moderns have preferred to believe and say that anthropomorphism is only about shape.  However, the way that white (we're conforming to an injunction requiring that the W in "white" when applied to people be de-capitalized and presented in a much-smaller font; it shows how free everyone is) people have tried to make other people look the same as them makes white people the standard.  The mathematics scores of white people are deemed good, and any group of people who does not equal them is deemed discriminated against.  Repetitive attempts to tell a story about Beginning do so in white people terms, and Jesusian attempts to anthropomorphize a deity are, in truth, attempt to flatter the people telling the story.  

Older Christianity (Jesusian) is a religion whose adherents consider/ed themselves greatly modern and advanced similarly, celebrating how advanced and progressive they were for venerating merely one godhead rather than many godheads.  Some of the snobbery regarding “pagans” survives in the historical record, evincing how, like today’s faithful, earlier Christians were very proud of their modern, observation-based intelligence.  Many whites said that they were modern, dynamic, and rare for being so advanced as to worship only one godhead.  

In truth, Legacy Christianity was a regression not a progression.  People who respected the relationship between human beings and the environment that supported those human beings were killed or enslaved by people who served philosophies of universalism instead.  They said that man was not part of the environment but was a discrete thing.  

The battle between the concepts of animism/paganism and universalism can be here seen.  Christian egalitarianism, like democratic socialism, does not work the way life works.  It is equality based, not hierarchy based.  Imagine the proverbial jungle.  Three hungry predators find one great steak.  One of the predators is the smallest, one is the largest, and one is in the middle.  Which one gets the steak?  Exactly: they form a planning committee and a few weeks later decide that each shall receive about 1/3 of the steak (with the dividing favoring the little one to be fair).  

The conflict between Christian egalitarianism and reality can be by such an example expressed.  If you think you are seeing nonsense in politics now, imagine Europeans when Christianity first got into Europe.  A migrant gets his case dismissed for raping a 9-year-old; someone else gets two years in prison for making an angry meme.  Seems bad, yes, but imagine 10 someones not even eliciting comment for nine-timing some 5-year-old heathen while someone else gets tortured to death across the street for trying to damn his people to hell because he denied the Christ.  The people who come after think they will defend their land by loving the Christ.  

All of the hostility between Jesusianism and Bangism originates from this nexus.  The belief that humans did not evolve in their environments, but were created by a non-environmental principle, is this.  

The religion of Saviorianity was ridiculous, of course, as today’s, but that ridiculousness is not acknowledged by its adherents.  Nor is today's Bangist universalism any better.  At today’s point those adherents are still exceedingly haughty and arrogant about their preferred impossibility.  After all, the people who are considered the wisest of wise people are known to support what they believe, and to an opponent they could ask, “Isn’t it true that no significant government sanctions your heresy?”  Humans have either not at all, or very little changed.  

The improvement of Bangist Christianity over Jesusian Christianity can be seen here.  In both faiths, the worshiper does not understand the thing supposedly believed.  Both faiths, though, have different components of actual belief.  In Jesusian Christianity, the worshiper often secretly does not believe the ridiculous thing s/he claims to believe, but in Bangist Christianity, the worshiper actually believes the ridiculous thing.  The Jesusian often understands the story well enough to feel inside that it is an utterly ridiculous story, and vigorously pretends that the story is believed—an invisible man in the sky really cares about you.  By combining those two things, presentation of belief and private disbelief for which s/he secretly begrudges her/himself, the Jesusian will go to her/his death acting like s/he believes, because s/he has been assured that such is good behavior (faith).  

For the Bangist Christian, though, the ridiculous impossible story is actually believed!  The worshiper knows that s/he does not understand the story, but assumes that smarter people somewhere understand it, and that it is correct.  There are no crises of faith, because such a worshiper truly believes in the story.  

Per today’s most-popular faith, our evolution-example organism Alexandra was randomly developing that air-respirating lung, not developing it on purpose.  It only seems designed for Earthly air because every mistake died off; the changes toward that end happened randomly.  And the fossil record shows that there were no mistakes, so luck was just that good, and the impossibility of something much smaller than a human evolving in the lifetime of Earth can just not be thought about.  

(Being considered good by Bangists means having faith that what is popular is true, but nowadays you never call it “faith.”)  

There is not nearly enough time for random mutations to have changed organisms to be what we see today, but Jesusian Christianity has said some very stupid things, and Bangist Christians have been eager to just focus on those.  I.e., notions of identity and nation--material--had not been yet subsumed by early Christianity, and now as matter-disavowal has grown with Christianity's spread, many Europeoids have been tricked into believing that an early Christian imposition upon their forefathers' culture represents those same things.  Again, it is like saying that cancer is good because things were so much better when the tumor was small and you could get out of bed every morning.  No, cancer is bad like Christianity is bad!  Saying people should say "Amen!" to reconnect with Europeoid tradition is like saying that people should reconnect with health by celebrating tumors.  

As Jesusian Christianity was narcissistic, so too is Bangist.  European humans said for a very long time that someone like them had created everything with a big bang and then had created them specifically for Earth’s environment.  In that way but without bodily anthropocentrism, the “it was random!” variant of Saviorianity is extremely self-focused.  Much as Yahweh ordered men to not treat other men like women, the doth protesting too much effect is very indicative about who created the philosophy.  The extremely high rate of Christian priest homoerotic abuse of male children reveals the truth about Yahweh’s vociferous and violent concern with homoeroticism.  Just like that, the intense proclamation that one is not religious reveals the true religiosity of Bangist Christianity.  E.g. people now think so incredibly hard that they're past religion that they're not at all past it--you can see the aversion to evidence, the egalitarianism, still dominating.  

Additional Evolutionary Numbers

Were evolution somehow random, other Alexandra-like organisms would’ve been, at the same time as Alexandra, developing new organs.  Beyond impossibility, the aforementioned extreme unlikelihood would then need to be multiplied by as many species as there are now.  So, 1/10e^150-ish would have to be multiplied by itself far more than 3 times (as many times as there are types of animal on Earth).  Truly extreme low chances would thence become much less likely—again and again.  And again.  Not only the number of species existing now, but for all time life has existed on Earth, is a very big number (not just every animal of which you can think, but lots more microorganism species).  Even if we selectively sample the fossil record in search of partial proof to seem intelligent—the endemic habit of today’s Saiunce-priests—that denominator is still a very big number.  

Ergo if evolution were random, there would be an Alexandra-line developing a lung suited for breathing Earthly air.  There would also be an Alexandra-line developing a lung which breathed pure hydrogen, one pure helium, one pure argon, gaseous and fluidic respectively.  Such creatures would die very soon after birth, but a few of their remains would be in the fossil records.  The Bangist jests about Jesusians saying Satan created the fossil record to trick man away from Jesus should be turned around times a hundred or so, because the fossil record is disproving Bangism and they themselves demonstrated 'twas fair to include mockery in the game.  Because one out of 98!, or one out of roughly 1.5 googol, of the possibilities (generously discounting fluids and fractions) would be the very specific mix of molecules that is Earth-air, the vast majority of the fossil record should show organisms developing differently.  They would have possessed incomplete lungs on the way to being able to breathe other elements.  We know organisms must have been able to survive with incomplete lungs for many millions of years because we can find an Alexandra breathing air at the zoo.  Pursuant to the official story of evolution, a working set of lungs means that Alexandra possessed a non-working, partially complete set for at least a few million years.  Thus, prior to today’s Alexandra having developed a working Earth-air-respirating lung, the fossil record should be stuffed full of the remains of these alternately lunged creatures.  There should be overflowing evidence of ammonia-breathing Alexandrae who never left the water or died of asphyxiation.  Many would have gone extinct, but many should still be surviving today.  The extinct ones also should have left behind over 99/100 of the fossils there are today—but there is not even a single one of those fossils.  

Consider, with exceeding generosity, the fossil record as it should look pursuant to random evolution.  Even if the Alexandra-line is inerrantly developing aforementioned organ for breathing Earthly air, there should be at least a googol animals who are not.  So thus 50 years later, and again 50 years later, and so on.  Those googol other organisms every lifetime (far more than a googol, but again, we’re being exceedingly generous to religion), when they die, should leave behind carcasses.  Those would evince a prodigious glut in the fossil record of the randomly evolved: yet there is not even a single one.  Even with all of the incredible assumptions necessary to create the spate of coincidence that makes a small segment of Alexandra random-evolutionable (the whole thing is still impossible), the record should show other random results: it does not.  

As the fossil record disproves the text of the Bible that is left after many Christian were killed (formally because of disagreements about how to best worship the rabbi in the Bible), it disproves utterly also the assumptions of random mutation.  

The many wars, burnings, consignment to watery oblivions, rewritings, and other killings that formed the acceptable books in the Bible should be things of which potential say-they-believers (“believers”) take note.  They won’t, of course, anymore than the other type of universalist admits to, or even knows her or himself if that person with a brain designed to respond to evidence actually ever has faith (belief in things for which there is no evidence).  Nonetheless, they should.  It is incredibly murderous to support various show-democracies now; it is always thus with universalism/egalitarianism.  Many people are currently amazed at watching the people of Europe pay large amounts to greatly hurt themselves, and yet what already happened with Christianity was that.  Again, it is normal for things in societies of White people to be that way—that is what White people do.  

There is no evidence of organisms with bodies randomly suited for other environments than Earth’s environment.  This is because of environmental correspondence.  Just as Jesusian “this one special rabbi designed it all” religion is wrong, Bangist “nature picked the fittest” religion is wrong.  Evolution is not random, and the fossil record shows an unerring march of environmental correspondence toward today’s organisms.  It shows zero evidence of the overpowering supermajority of very unsuited, thoroughly unsuited, and slightly unsuited samples which it would show if creatures had been produced through “random mutation.”  There are and were never ammonia-respirating lungs.  

Just like the fossil record shows untrue Legacy Christian philosophy, it shows untrue modernized Christian philosophy.  The two Christianities are just different stripes of the same predator: universalism.  The egalitarianism of which Jesus spoke, and the biblical universalism, were part of the process of breaking down a society.  The Christianized West had an earlier form of universalism, and the political correctness and stubborn insistence of test scores equalizing between breeding groups is that same poison developed.  

Even if random evolution were somehow right, and by marvelous coincidence had produced Earth’s fossil record while providing 10,000 matings each day (that’s still not nearly enough), even small Earth-organisms would not have had enough time to evolve.  The Jesusian Christian excuse of the invisible rabbi working in mysterious ways has to be the posited nemesis to keep people from thinking about how long random mutation would have taken to effect changes otherwise.  That is why the invisible rabbi works.  An organism possessing only a few trillion cells (i.e. an organism smaller than a human) would need that rabbi to suddenly mutate a few hundred billion of its cells to change it.  As before, religion (here the Bangist, non-Jesus kind) has to rely on bandwagons and appeals to mystical authority, for evidence not only fails ever to support it, but in fact directly refutes it.  

The dominant prior version of Christianity called facts which disproved the religion a “mystery” and relied on what it called experts to decipher the meanings of those mysteries.  The dominant current version of Christianity does the same.  Assuming non-evidenced nonsense is true because groups of people with Papers Saying they are Very Smart (P.S.V.S.) is still the way believers support the religion—is still the way religion works.  

All limbs are complete.  Creatures today have legs, or they have fins, but there are today zero—and the fossil record has zero—incomplete half-legs grown out of surviving, reproducing creatures which randomly began evolving something else mid-leg rather than finishing evolving the leg over many years.  There are many animals out there, and that includes many strange things, but illustratively put, there are not lions with half a chimpanzee-style foot growing out of their back.  Randomness would have created such chimaeras, just as Jesus would have been responsible for making a world that included child-rape rather than having every single thing be the same except potential child-rapists changed their mind.  Like the old question about if God could make a rock so big He couldn't move it, the response has just been to ignore that, donate now, and OH WOW LOOK OVER THERE THAT CAR IS SO COOL LOOK LOOK LOOK NOW!!!    

A leg is dramatic in the sense of being easy to imagine.  Were evolution random and life on Earth an amazing rarity of random luck, the fossil record would show an abundance of creatures that were water-dwelling but which had developed a partial air-respirating lung.  The fossil record does not show this.  Even in tiny, arguable hints, it does not show the barest trace of this.  That fossil record is just as much proof that cellular mutations during reproduction are random as that God did it all in 6,000 years,  

Jesusian Christians today claim the Bible is accurate in defiance of the just-more-than-six-days’ time creating the Earth took, which geological tests have already demonstrated to be massively wrong.  Exhibiting this same type of behavior, Bangist Christian today claim evolution was random in defiance of the superabundance of time randomly evolving even one creature would have taken.  

Because the fossil record shows no ammonia-respirating lungs, lungs in progress, or lungs completed of any other kind, we have another kind of proof that there never was any randomized evolution.  

“Random evolution” is not just a thing that probably did not happen, but a thing that could not have happened.  “Probably not” is in the sense of it being less than a 1 in a very large number.  Truly impossible is zero in however many numbers, as in a coin flip where you’re trying to get “feet” on a coin that only has “heads” and “tails.”  Random mutation is truly impossible because of the size of organs, not merely mathematically extremely unlikely.  

Think of a creature on a planet covered in naturally occurring cheesecake.  It rains cheesecakes there, and most of that planet is covered by cheesecakes.  The officially smartest people on that planet first conclude that the Divine Baker made all that cheesecake, and after a long time conclude that there was no Divine Baker but those cheesecakes just appear randomly.  Do you believe them?  

No; there is obviously some relationship there between the cheesecakes and those organisms made to process cheesecakes; whose health depends on cheesecakes.  Saying that relationship doesn't exist is how stupid Bangist Christianity is.  If you instead think there is a Divine Baker doing invisible work somewhere, that is stupid, yes, but saying there is no relationship between the cheesecakes and the cheesecake-requiring organisms is absurd.  The fact that Earthlings "randomly" evolved to need to breathe oxygenated nitrogen and get regular infusions of hydrogen is an insane delusion, far stupider than the Earthling's insistence that the creator of everything looks like a human man and really loves you.  Jesusianism is big heap dumb, but Bangism is even dumber.  

Light and Shadow

The missing things in Bangism and Jesusianism--things like, why did God make terminal cancer for little kids or how did things evolve so fast--have been very damaging to development.  For how long did people not fly or go into space; for how long will people not get something quite simple like environmental correspondence?