The Great Re-Epsteinment 2

Matching Game

One of Decay's more effective tools is antilife.  Think about a human life, and how decay is a lead to death (e.g. aging on the way to dying).  In addition to that, think about how some disease can kill cells (via a microscopic great replacement; not via some wicked cell assassin lurking in shadowed alleys with an overcoat and a dagger) to effect the end result which kills off the organism.  Like initial Jesusianism, Russian communism, and so forth, death is just frosting--kill a village of heathens, pour molten lead down some priest's throat, and it's just part of accomplishing the whole purpose anyway.  

Death is extremely useful when it comes to killing a society.  That's why Decay like things like chemotherapy so much--causing death.  (If you don't know much about chemotherapy, look it up--you might learn something interesting.)  Having people eat pudding laced with teensy bits of glass would be almost orgasmic (spiritually not literally) for Decay.  They like when death happens the same way a normal human likes to eat a good meal or make sweet love to some person who likes them and whom they want to keep.  

The life v. antilife distinction can make it much easier to understand modern pop culture.  The seeming craziness of many things within a human society committing self-harm leads to inane attempts like making up theories about a bad man in red pajamas who likes bad things (Satan) or why certain genetic arrangements are suicidal (pathological altruism), but those don't really work if you look closely at them.  

COVID.  Mass immigration.  Easy.  So turn it up.  

Giving a legal right for firearm-carrying to someone not genetically equipped to control impulses and thus invent things like firearms.  Chemtrails.  Effing with the weather.  Etc. etc.  Whyever do people do these things?  

Death!  So you try to figure it out, and the best you got is self-deception?  An invisible bad sub-deity in red pajamas?  Maybe getting rich?  Again, many theories are offered in the attempt to explain these behaviors, such as trying to damage Jesus' cosmigasmic creation because Satan gets off on that or because their genes cause them to help people so much it hurts them.  

(Pathological altruism is a nice story, but think about how long human genes developed.  Did the fish who eagerly worked to deliver food to other fish who sometimes hurt or killed it win the struggle for survival?  What about the rat that did that?  The early proto-monkey?  The ape?  The human?  No.  The humans accused of developing pathological altruism from culture is, again, a nice story, but fails.  What about the early Europeoid farming bands who had a passion for delivering lots of their food to other bands and then leaving.  Did they exist?  No!  The criticism of pathological altruism has to imply it very recently appeared, but so massively that it covered large swathes of the West.  Ridiculous.  It's a Bangist Christian fantasy.  Jesus walks on water and Europeoids give their money away because they just love that.)

This behavior so many take as confusing happens because the environment is cycling and humans are part of that environment.  The reason people do those things, the reason they feel what they feel and say what they say etc. is that the environment is decaying.  

Tighten focus.  Think COVID.  Lockdowns.  Masks.  Social distancing.  How do you create life?  Males see females, lots like that, relationships form, kids appear.  Lockdowns, masks, and social distancing make that less likely to happen.  They are antilife.  All the weird, nonsensical, self-harming things that are occurring are happening because human beings are components of their environment, not individualized self-benefiting machines.  Most of the bad feelings, the weirdness of the tyrannical future many perceive, is the decay of the West.  When you see this bad thing, and many keep doing it, their behavior, their belief that it is somehow a good thing, is just them being part of the environment while they justify their behavior by saying/thinking whatever as an illusion to shield their souls (their minds; trick themselves; to engage in self-deception).  It is like the wind blowing in certain ways at certain times, and the seemingly crazy things people say/think about why they're doing it are very often not true.  That is why curing their ignorance of something being bad often doesn't work.  (In the few situations where it does work, the world still does what it does; you might make someone troubled about it, though.)  

That is what people're doing when they support immigration: they're parts of an environment making that environment cycle, i.e. destroying it, and the pollyannaish fantasies they exhibit about that being good are just that: pollyannaish fantasies.  This can be seen in the recurrent fantasies people have about how good this or that type of ownership restriction (socialism) will be.  The things most of those people believe are truly believed, there is no deceit and no lies, and in the rare occasion where their belief includes that they're doing some insane thing for the benefit of this man in red pajamas whom no one has ever seen (Satanism), that doesn't make that man exist.  

Sometimes such people are Decay or current and future skimanagers, and their predictions about the short-term (a few thousand years?  A few dozen?  Depends; stay tuned.) benefits of what they're doing may be true.  However, whatever any given person thinks, feels, says, etc. about why s/he is supporting what s/he supports is not a foundation upon which to base your thought.  

The Brain-Generated Soul

Our most sacred of sacred cows is shown by this evidence.  Both of the major forms of Christianity are centered around the notion of the brain-generated soul.  Your sins are attributable to you.  Your money is attributable to you.  Etc.  No, as said before, we don't mean "environment" like "culture is responsible for low test scores," and we don't mean "your money should be belong to everyone."  Conception of an individual, and property, are very important, but they do not explain why people act the way they act--why people are people.  What self-aware life is.  

Many people recognize that men bu+teffing each other is not at all a life-making thing, and get creepy feelings from it being presented as the same as a life-affirming relationship.  That is a healthy, good, anti-antilife reaction ("pro-life" is a better term but has been so misused by the abortion debate we're skipping it).  Good, healthy, right, etc. it is that when people realize that gays advocating for "gay marriage," that trains no eye dudes wondering why guys who like women won't date them, etc. indicate something deeply wrong.  However, it is a sad irony--a huge, sad irony--when Europeoids who recognize that think they should worship S.R.  Like being trapped in a dark cave unarmed and hearing a sniffing bear somewhere out there, they know there is some kind of danger, but they don't see the danger of Europeoids ascribing their existence and everything nice/good they've ever done to a Middle Eastern rabbi rather than to Europeoid genes.  It's a little bit ironic, don'tcha think?  

The irony can be expressed by understanding that Jesusianism--traditional Christianity; the only thing you think Christianity is when you don't get that christ means "savior" and that from what Christ is saving you is matter (reality)--is the same sort of sickness as trains no eye advocacy.  Anti-reality.  Antilife.  When traditional Christianity wanted to burn away all the renditions of attractive women and happy families and replace them with renditions of a man writhing in very little clothing, it was that.  The same sort of aversion modern Jesusians feel when they see some rainbow flag replacing the Union Jack or the Stars and Stripes, which represents antilife (like trains no eye home ohs trying to have a sexual relationship with other men), is that felt by more aware people when they see a necklace with a golden cross on it.  The latter is a symbol of something utterly disgusting; of the foul mist of what buggery represents replacing life.  

Celebrating the cross is an anti-matter, antilife act.  It is having a logo celebrating antilife.  If you think it is good for people to reject matter, then you are supporting the philosophy that led to sickos seeking orgasms from prepubescent females.  You are thinking that by supporting Jesus you are defending life, such as families and productive relationships, but you have been tricked.  Prepubescent females, just like trains no eye home oh men, produce zero babies ever.  Which side do you support?  What do you prefer to happen to your world?  

Today's Jesusian is often having the correct, healthy reaction, but doesn't see that the bad things have tricked them toward the same end in another way.  Just as conservatives end up wanting to conserve what liberals did a few decades ago, and so are the more committed people to anti-matter things, Jesusians are the more committed people to anti-matter things.  Europeoid genes have been marginalized not just by the initial rapists and murderers, but by the many-years-later people who are conserving the fall of Europe to Torah 2.0.  If you see the storm coming for something good, and you want to be a person who supports goodness not badness, then don't be an advocate for what has already been taken.  

Where do you stand when the storm is coming in?  

Somewhere out there in space exists a planet--a whole viable planet--where egalitarianism won.  A conceptual entity like Jesus spread an understanding of how everyone was created the same way, in a creationary burst by a lone man-like entity.  Everyone there learned to embrace love of their own wise pleasure; everyone was saved from the material world.  There was a lot of friendship, a lot of pleasure, and a lot of gifts exchanged.  Everyone was accepting, and those who believed themselves ultrasexual or omnisexual thrived.  Every man came to love the idea of being close to a divine man.  There were no borders, and it was truly the united heaven, where everyone came together in love of whatever they there called separation from matter (savior).  

What happens?  Why, those planets are all tombs, of course.  Supporting the savior from matter is supporting not just your own death, but everyone's death accompanied by no new life.  Instead, everyone dreams of going to live in happy Happyland where antilife things happen like women and couples aren't important but every man gets to be cradled by a loving man, and everything will be forever equal.  That is what the Bible is: a fantasy about not a couple, not any women, but a sexless "marriage" and a man alone (like Men Alone II).  

The only true equality is death.  Saying good people should be saved from matter--Christians--or free from matter--liberals--is supporting death.  The true battle is good v. evil.  It can seem falsely dramatic, but that is the only real battle, between existence and not.  All the little sub-battles, the arguments about this or that, are just that: subsidiaries, representations, etc. of the fundamental conflict between using matter to have bodies versus not using matter to have bodies.  The fierce opposition to using matter to have bodies--being in any way a living organism--can seem so incredibly obvious that no one would oppose it, and yet there are a lot of liberals and Jesusians out there.  The liberals have convinced themselves that goodness is found in denying that matter influences the soul at all, and so too have the Jesusians, though each set uses very different words to describe the same essential thing.  

Think of how incredibly obvious, a basic fact denied by modern society, it is that how arrangements of matter are organized establish what that matter can do.  The nonsense of recent political correctness followed by today's trains no eye advocacy, stems from the original source of matter disavowal a.k.a. Christianity (Jesusianism).  It is such a huge irony when Legacy Christians now are more likely to resist the nonsense of trains no eye advocacy, because they themselves are advocating for the goodness of transcending matter (in that case, by weird, spooky, potentially gay fascination with the thought of a divine man).  

Look again; see Europa tricked into worship by an evil little goblin.  Now, in 2025, her distant descendants are thinking they're eagerly reclaiming their tradition by… 

Remember, the goblins didn't conquer the elves by fighting, but by lying.  They tricked other elves into dominating/killing elves so that the end result was Christianity.  As we are seeing with immigration now, it is a much more efficient conquest to not fight a war in an honest manner, but to say untrue things to certain people and then there is terror.  Then as now, there were good people tricked into doing horrible things that were bad for themselves and their own genetic lines as they thought they were defending their blood by attacking others.  If you say that is bad, does it mean that the people carrying out the real work--the deceived ones--are themselves bad?  No.  Just like the Red Terror, though, they are useful idiots--they have been deceived into committing certain acts.  That's why the goblins were so foul--that's what it means.