Planned 2
Continued from Planned 1.
Negating Evidence
Human beings can and do negate evidence. The fact that Jesusian Christianity dominated for so very long shows this, and the persistence of the un-evidenced, consensus-based Bangist Christianity now shows this. The non-personified, religion-disavowing nature of Bangist Christianity is presented as a non-religion, but its disavowal of matter as well as its passion for never-evidenced things gives it away.
It can be unpleasant, it can be hard to consider, but think about how the bad things now are founded on Legacy Christianity:
1) All men are brothers created by the same father; genetic differences are irrelevant.
2) This giant bad thing in the future must be prepared for by all good people.
3) We must be constantly on guard against never-ending threats caused by a badness we can never find.
Mass migration, climate change, and racism are Christian. The fundamental natures of what is known as Creationism, Judgement, and Satan are still there, expressed in the ways previously referenced. These concepts aren't personified like Jesus is, but the great passion--the suicidal lunacy--of the people (mostly Europeoids) advocating for them is the same.
The Irony
The irony is that Jesusians are much more likely to perceive the wrongness in Bangism than others. To whit, self-described "conservative Christians" are much more likely to see the empty spiritless doom, the social destruction of mass immigration, the disgusting preference for orgasmic attraction toward non-reproductive orifices (home-oh or pedophiliac), of modern Bangist Christian philosophies. However, they have been deceived, because they bear the predecessor of these very things--the earlier stage of the same cancer. Saying that matter is a lesser thing from which one should want to be saved--Christianity; Saviorianity, remember again that christ means savior--is exactly what trains no eye, associated home-oh, and genetically heterogenous sameness nonsense is about.
Consider the proverbial witch burning.
However flawed, philosophies of universalism have been incredibly powerful. Islam controls so many; Jesusians killed so many of their own on behalf of an invisible man who lived in the sky. Jesusian Christianity shows that the forebears of most Europeans are as intelligent and trustworthy as some bloke who says that his invisible friend wants him to kill people—and then that person does kill people. And the jury lets him off because, well, his invisible friend did want that to happen.
The insanity, the great harm Jesusianism has done to Europe, is why you can't reasonably argue that religion (Legacy Christianity) is good for social cohesion. In the same way that U.S. taxpayers were funding hundreds of millions of dollars worth of "gender studies" programs in Afghanistan, in the same way that young FTM trains no eye girls having mastectomies and worse is harmful, the "social cohesion" argument doesn't work. Bangism is bad, but Jesusianism is bad too. Tumors should not be helped to cure the cancer.
Modern Jesusians tend to forget that. Like, the Protestant v. Catholic conflicts. If the Protestants heard that some man who'd been Protestant walked into some Catholic Mass and shot everyone there, would they conclude that that man had done right? What about some Catholic who wiped out a Presbyterian churchful of worshipers--was that a good, holy thing when that man opened up with automatic fire and killed that congregation? No! They would think that'd been a bad thing. And yet, their respective faiths are founded on a history of such behavior (not one guy with a machine gun but 1,000 with swords). The Pope is not a traitor to Catholicism when he does some universalist thing; that is what popes have always been doing. Yeah, the current one might bless a million immigrants, but like the drip before the flood, the one centuries ago who blessed only 10 immigrants was a sign of what it was really about. 0 to 10 is far more meaningful than 10 to 10 million--once that zero has been broken, it's just a matter of time.
Even if you say that all the touching of choirboys was just a few bad apples and means nothing, even if you say that all the earlier wars to massacre populations that refused to get baptized were just resource competition rationalized as religious later on, what about the Protestant v. Catholic thing?
Bangists today send fleets of fighter-bombers to mass murder babies to bring democracy, which they believe a clear good. It is a trait of Europeoids, not an aberration, to behave so. A feature, not a bug.
Into the Present
Remember the previous wars under the Christian justification when you see Europeoid liberals demanding immigrants get support now. What they are supporting involves the destruction of what they like, but they are from a population--Europeoids--that has been selected for many dozens of generations to support non-evidence-based things. Many otherwise good people behave this way, whether Bangists supporting later Middle Eastern immigration and cultural expansion or Jesusians supporting earlier Middle Eastern immigration and cultural expansion. They do not believe they are shooting themselves in the foot, as it were; that is just the way they think.
We lack the science to teach us how conception and quickening occur. Many people are made nervous by the lack of knowledge of distinction, as in it being socially okay to terminate one form of life but not another (later-stage abortion). Additionally, we lack the science to teach us how mutation happens or how environmental correspondence causes the mutations we have been asked to faithfully ascribe to “Yahweh,” “Jesus,” or “randomness.” The obvious connection between things and their environments is easy to see. The Bangist not thinking about it makes the Jesusian "my invisible sky friend did it" seem to many rational, just as the ridiculous story of the Jesusian "my invisible sky friend did it" is used to make Bangist nonsense look better.
But religious assumptions are nonetheless mass-adopted. There is evidence of Earth living too short a time to permit random good luck having happened. Random mutation is a disproved “theory”—called a theory by many, but in fact believed to be a transcendent truth by the faithful—a religious faith believed in defiance of science, and outright stupid. Similarly, Jesus was supposed to come back at CE100, then just as surely at CE200, CE1000, CE2000, and so on, yet there are still Jesusians today who generally don't know that their preferred culture is built on provable mistruths that you can see.
Continuance of Stupidity
Modern Bangist Christians tend to believe that the things they believe are true, and that because they don't have an anthropomorphic godhead, they are different and smart. However, as aforementioned, Jesusians have believed that many times. After all, they had all the knowledge of the study of the Creator for over a thousand years in 1500!
It is easy to imagine a person in CE2525 thinking about a person from CE2025. Is that former person likely to think of that latter person as informed? Did that latter person have the correct worldview? As aforementioned, the popular conception of evolution is incredibly, easily-demonstrably wrong, yet very popular in CE2025. Now is not a special time of wisdom--people have always been thinking that what to them is "now" is a special time of wisdom.
Reflect again on how, with the size of a large organism on Earth, it is not just a preferential choice in what to believe, but impossible for “random evolution” to be true. Even with a million million bajillion coincidences (times a zillion), there is not nearly enough time. The same with the new Genesis (the Big Bang). Gravity, along with plans for how cells will grow mutating during reproduction, are known things. Things which exist are observable evidence. Believing things that have no evidence they exist has always been the way of Christianity. The idea that belief without evidence (faith) is good is that. Self-help gurus and Christmas movies often don't use the word "faith," but it's still that concept.
It is a very difficult place, ideologically, to understand that this is a dark age. You have probably believed all your adult life that what you believe is smart, true, and better than before. What you can presume, though, is that people on Earth for over a thousand years have believed this same thing—that what they believe is smart, true, and better than before. They have said they believed that by choosing the one true god rather than other spirits (possibly demons) they were better. In addition, they have said they believed that their fellows have invented things which are so much better and smarter than the things in the past, and that this is proof that they live in an enlightened, better time.
(Jesina HAS to interrupt. These Ists are SO sickening! If they just shut their eyes and didn't tell anyone they were imagining pleasing a divine man to bring about His Second Coming, things would be better! Christianity Rules, and the things they say aren't true, and they will be SO in trouble when Jesus does Rapture! The bad viewpoints shown here prove these anti-Christ sickos are even so un-educated they don’t understand evolution. These racist sexist bigot Nazi heathen infidels (“Ist” for short; they’re “Ists”) are so bad and so evil. It is amazing how dumb they are.
It is an enlightened better time! Every man can shut his eyes and imagine pleasing a man so much and being ready for a Second Coming. Those stupid Ists don’t understand real biology and are racist and so istist. They believe in isms and must be seen through. This is why there must be this writing showing how wrong they are so they understand how Jesus was so cruelly executed to save you.
Returning to their craziness, which I remind you is presented only so it can be better countered.)
People in the 21st century C.E. often believe that they dwell in an advanced time period of enlightenment, where a religion cannot possibly dominate their thoughts. However, they can easily believe that, for quite a few years, humans have believed to be true incorrect things. It is a short but difficult trip to perceive that humankind has still not taken the intellectual baby step of believing things based on evidence, rather than believing things based on consensus.
Age of Superstition
Humans on Earth currently dwell in an age of superstition, which age they began dwelling in when what would lead to Christianity taking Europe. It is just a coincidence that the Kali Yuga was said to've begun about BCE3102. As though those kooky Hindus back than knew something! Remember that you can think about things, and disagree with things, as much as you want.
As ever, the stupid majority of Europeoids believe that their wise people are very wise, that they know much more and are much smarter than the people of the past, et cetera. And, as before, they are completely, utterly, embarrassingly wrong. Believing that they are very wise for having transcended belief in personified godheads, Europeoids in general are quite infantile; quite simple-minded.
(Modern people do have lots more techno-goodies and better weapons than the people of the past, but that does not mean modern Europeoids are smarter. Many Europeoids regularly believe that they are smart, because they always have more and better stuff than the people 100 years ago. Think of how White people can invent lots of cool new whiz-bang-etc. crap, but can’t for the life of them figure out that doing so requires certain environments [which includes the people in that environment]. Other groups of people have figured this out, but White people are not smart enough.)
Like all religions past, it may seem and is used by the ruling class to be socially beneficial, creating the appearance of good intelligence and education to recite the dogma, but there exists no proof that the dogma is true. Neither on nor off the bandwagon is there proof. People honestly aping intelligent behavior must needs question themselves if they wish to act “intelligently” while saying they believe things without proof.
Justifying Stupidity
The crony capitalist lords of the industrial and post-industrial West in time found that a meritocratic religion justified their position: “survival of the fittest” is such a siren’s call. Theories of “the best are chosen to win” found fertile ground in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries C.E. People who take it for granted that their oversimplification of “Darwin” is correct, yet who also feel that child labor is wrong, have not addressed the consequences of what they advocate. Like Jesusians who actually believed in Jesus would just give away everything to the soup kitchen and then work there constantly until they died, Bangists who actually thought survival of the fittest produced the best would be very harsh critics of welfare--yet neither is the case.
Pretensions, hypocrisy, are incumbent upon Christianity. Does S.R. really exist, and does He want you to forsake riches? Then you give your 401(k) to the poor. Is meritocracy the best? Then you want the border patrol to have machine-gun nests and welfare checks to come with sterilization. Doesn't happen--oops! Hypocrisy! Just like airplanes and then space shuttles proved Jahweh wasn't watching from above, the "social justice" nonsense proves that the Darwin-fish bumper sticker isn't something in which people actually believe, but just an attack on Jesusianism.
The fossil record can only be made to cooperate by being cited against the bugbear of the abundantly stupider myth of Jesusian Christianity, rather than in its entirety. Which is to say, Darwin was a Jesusian Christian. His accurate discussion of offspring taking after their parents, and lack of statement about how genes change during reproduction, are not at all an endorsement of Bangism. Yet, it is the modern contention that invoking the name “Darwin” is somehow in contravention of Christianity, rather than a symptom of Christianity’s continuation.
Fossils Disproving Bangism--Again
A creature which successfully evolved an air-breathing lung should be decidedly outnumbered (to a factor of at least 100) by creatures possessing lungs designed for gaseous ammonia, chlorine, thorium, etc. Such creatures then could not use those lungs, and would swiftly perish. But if mutation happened randomly, such creatures would have survived without the additional lung working for a long time. Like the predecessors of Earth’s air-breathers, anything with a different lung in the making would have spent millions of generations surviving and reproducing, the same way that Earth’s air-breathers would not have had working lungs for a long time. Therefore, such organisms would have left the occasional fossil while developing new lungs. (Like, they have a pair of lungs which respirates water, while they evolve a pair of lungs which respirates air.) As such, we would see abundant evidence of those creatures having existed.
Because the fossil record shows the gradual progression of today’s organisms beginning after millions of years of non-human evolution, we know that the current version of Christianity was and is wrong. Darwin’s Origin of Species makes a point about how environmentally corresponding evolution of some preferred traits might work now, but like the Bible, says nothing correct about the many years of things before his birds (or humans).
Neither perspective adopted by the then-current Jesusian nor the successor Bangist religion is correct. The change of organisms via random mutation (often called evolution by Christians who say they are not Christians) is no more possible than extant, human-centered creationism. Both “theories” (dogma) are, like other hegemonic religions, an expression of what the dominant Earthly society at the time wants to believe.
Comments
Post a Comment