Shintoism

The way that Japanese traditions of knowing about and honoring a person’s genetics (their kin) became called a religion is instructive as to the way that paganism was created.  

The social coherence of a non-egalitarian-nonsense philosophy expressed an immunity to the egalitarian infection of Christianity; Legacy Christianity was designed specifically to break Europeoid cultures (note the similarity between Jesusianism and various egalitarianisms used against Europeoids, such as 1917 communism for the Rus or the 1964 Civil Rights Act for the Usicans: complete and utter nonsense, in both cases founded on the Legacy Christian foundation of universalism--both attacks included fooling victims by pretending to be against some earlier form of universalism, such as killing priests or battling Protestantism.  It is just like how Woke is funded by globalist crony capitalism while theoretically being against capitalism).  The seeming inability of the Japanese culture to accept the sterile worship of the single man from the foreign genetic grouping can be seen today in the way that Tokyo is not filled with mosques.  I.e., a very healthy, good thing, where the dangerous slow poison of the Abrahamic religions can be seen; where the Japanese refusal to drink the poisoned Kool-Aid proves itself way better.  

What the members of the Japanese genetic grouping would do is be aware of the overcoming of obstacles etc. which a person’s (genetic, duh) predecessors had done.  Because such a person’s forebears had transcended their own problems, a person could then feel reassured when facing problems.  Calling that a religion was incredibly stupid, but incredibly convincing to people infected by Christianity.  

You can see yourself how Europeoid people are vulnerable to being infected by egalitarian notions.  Such women will eagerly advocate for refugee men to live by them.  They don't want to be raped, they don't want to be beaten or stolen from etc., but they need universalism that badly.  White liberal women squealing that the U.S. President is a fascist are expressing how much they crave stories about universalism being true.  Like the aforementioned addict willing to suck any 10 d1x for another hit, it seems to make no sense, but Europeoids' brains are made that way.  They will do that, or say they believe in an invisible, all powerful sky friend who loves them.  Stories of universalism are that appealing to them.  

When someone shows an understanding of their ancestors does it mean that person is worshiping their ancestors like gods?  No!  Of course not!  However, minds infected by Christianity concluded that when people were showing respect to the existence of their forebears, they had cultural tradition of worshiping their forebears as gods.  This nonsensical kind of conclusion demonstrates how reverence for environments (the forest), environmental happenings (rainstorms, exemplified dramatically by Zeus and Thor throwing lightning), and parts of those environments (a deer in the forest, exemplified dramatically by Ukko) came to be called proof that the victims of Jesusianism had been pagan.  There is a healthy, direct connection between a society that wants to reproduce itself having young men thinking about finding a pretty forest or ocean maiden, and what came to be called Animism or Paganism: people making it through the winter, babies appearing, and so forth.  Contrast this with how many babies are produced if developing young men instead take vows of never lusting for women so they had decades free to spend reading the writings of a man who once met a man who once glimpsed a man that took off His clothes to suffer in front of a crowd.  

(Again, if you're a Jesusian, omnipotence [total power] means that God planned it that way.  He could've saved everyone by having a sandwich, lifting a finger, etc.  Instead, He did it by having a man suffer for a long time in very little clothing in front of a crowd.  Use your mind to think about how drag queen story hour and under-clad man suffering in front of a crowd relate: there is a buggery-desire there that is icky about which to think.  

More pleasantly, think of the fair folk, the sylphs or the sirens, that represent the reproductive urges of pre-Christian European men.  For you to advocate for European history being about revering that man rather than the women from earlier is, again, like a CE3025 person insisting that education needs to return to honored traditions of drag queen story hour.  The sylphs were just better; Japan won that one.)  

Just as modern people considering the insanity of modern society are often pre-conditioned to conclude from such observations that Satan's influence has grown, so our historical record has been afflicted.  Assuming that the ancients used to worship anthropomorpic furries is incorrect; said ancients just had great respect for forests, natural forces, and animals.  A pre-industrial person who likes to eat should; think of the saying that if it weren't for the farmers we'd all be farmers.  

Now think of modern Satanists.  If a bunch of idiot pee-doughs or "revolutionaries" does some bad thing, and says they did that bad thing for a fictional concept, that is not proof that said concept is non-fictional.  That is how dummies finding Japan concluded that the Japanese were worshiping their ancestors.  In reality, "venerating" is not "worshiping."  

Remember the way that Christianity attempts to conceal its stupidity by decreeing that all humans have been that stupid before.  Even though Bangism is currently predominant and many people tend to think that their thinking has evolved beyond such tomfooleries as passion for a divine man's passion, Western history is still founded on the initial tenets of Christianity, namely that the people who were dominated by various Christian stories (which, as discussed before, probably involved a series of lies about how the people of one area needed to dominate the people of a nearby area in order to save themselves from an attack, similar to the U.S.-led attack on Iraq in CE2003 to prevent Iraq attacking the U.S. with WMDs), were worshiping humanoid godheads before then.  Believing European history is as Legacy Christianity says is like kids in CE3025 learning from textbooks about how Iraq had been developing WMD to destroy the U.S., causing the war: not true.  The aggressor's writing of history is completely wrong, and all the misassumptions therefrom stemming are wrong--and that is how we are told to know that Deep Europeans worshiped humanoid furries and Deep Han worshiped their ancestors.  

People who respected the necessity of a healthy environment for sustaining human communities (pre-Christian Europeans) were not worshiping the trees etc. as gods, nor were the Japanese worshiping their ancestors as gods.  The lowness, the foulness, the incorrect nature of the Christian assessments of their victims must ever be taken into account.  Understandings of history—major ones—have been made just to make it look like deism was not as new, as stupid, as it was.  The deceptive illusion of monotheism being a progress, an advancement, is a deceptive illusion.