Evolution Fourth
Continued from Evolution Third.
“Mudskippers” are a finned, fish-like Earth-creature that can breathe air, and could represent an intermediate step along the path of faith in Lord Randomus. However, limbed creatures have developed from the primordial soup, ergo Alexandra would have had to develop air-breathing lungs and limbs to be a land-dweller today (i.e. you would have had to swim in the primordial soup). Ergo the fossil record should include at least a million years’ worth of remains of creatures that had a working water-breathing lung and an incomplete, non-working air-breathing lung. Today’s popular media-fantasy of an African woman being “Eve” to everyone should be replaced by a maternal fish.
While that line of future air-breathers was evolving, it survived, though incomplete; though yet in-process. It had to develop not only the lungs for breathing Earthly air, but one leg, then a second, then the skin, the eyes, and so forth. Under the random religion, that’s a few hundred million years, generously.
Why, then, does the fossil record show no such organisms to have ever existed? Mudskippers—think of them like amphibian-fish that dwell in environments where they do not require limbs to move on mushy “land” that alternates between both solidic and fluidic—are the closest, indeed only, supposition. Moreover, no species exist now, nor exist in the fossil record at all—ergo never existed—which represent an organism that developed half an air-breathing lung, then began forming something else instead. No evidence exists of a species that developed half that lung and then, by chance, stopped evolving that lung. There is no record of even the ancestors of today’s successful air-breathers who had half the working lung in-progress. The wishful stupidity of older White Jesusians claiming that Satan had made up the fossil record to trick them (Satan had time for that in-between having all those priests touch choirboys in the crotch) is pitiful. However, the modern, educated, avowedly anti-Christian take on matter-transcendence is even more pitiful.
A random evolution would, of course, be far more likely along the course of things to develop something other than lung cells. If the lungs are 3% of the body, then at least 90% of the fossils should show a creature with part of a lung developed and something else then developed instead. I.e. fossils of things that are otherwise normal but have part of a second/third/etc. lung somewhere else. But the fossil record does not show this: it shows creatures evolving with environmental correspondence, not randomly.
It is very difficult—extremely difficult—for people who have faith in Lord Randomus (i.e. un-evidenced belief in random mutations producing the fossil record within the time allowed) to comprehend how randomness would have produced vast quantities of fossils and living organisms which are different than what is there. So, they ignore it. Like a bunch of Y.O. religious idiots refusing to look through Galileo’s telescope, they just can’t process that what they want to be true is not true. We have discussed how evolution cannot be random; it is not a matter of a mere few billion years proving wrong the random faith, but of many more years than Earth has been around.
Going by the currently official stories about the age of the “united verse” (10-20 billion years), there isn’t even enough time in the whole “universe” for life to have evolved anyway. Life could not have evolved from amino acids to single-celled organisms to multicelled organisms to fish to elephants in just 10-20 billion years. There isn’t enough time for even one species on this one planet to have gone from fish-equivalent to elephant-equivalent, and the story that well over 100 species of animal just happened to do that on this planet is completely absurd. The currently official story of how evolution works is about as reasonable as the popular story about an invisible wise man in the clouds who prohibited eating pork, and then decided to stop prohibiting eating pork. And to use polite language, that is a pretty unreasonable story.
It is very easy with a calculator to figure out that there is no way the Earth is anywhere near old enough to have allowed “random evolution” to have happened. Despite this intellectual ease, though, and although telescopes are much cheaper than they were in Galileo’s time, people still cling to universalism. They will not look through that telescope. Everyone knows that Lord Jesus made everything go around the Earth we mean everyone knows that evolution was random.
Organisms that had partially evolved organs: the fossil record would include a superabundance of such organisms’ remains, if random evolution had happened. Every fossil of a T-Rex, for example, would be covered by a million other fossils of a T-Rex with part of a fifth liver randomly evolved somewhere, or part of a third foot unfortunately growing out of the shoulder, or that kind of stuff. Yet, such is never found. The fossil record only shows an inerrant, environmentally corresponding march toward today’s Earth-environment-suited creatures.
(Imagine a T-Rex’s body, and then imagine a foot appearing randomly somewhere on it. If it were placed randomly, and succeeded only due to survival contests, how likely would that foot grow where a foot is supposed to be? Yeah, that T-Rex evolved from a predecessor, but it’s just an example of where the foot would evolve randomly. So again, how likely would it be for that foot to grow where a foot is supposed to be? Randomly, there should be a majority of feet growing in the wrong place, such as fossils of dead T-Rexes with feet started on their forehead, the left side of their tail, their stomach area, and so on. But there are not. There are zero such remains. Every single thing in the entire fossil record looks like it did not happen randomly. There is not enough time for random evolution to have occurred; perhaps if Earth were a few hundred billion years old, we could have a different discussion about evolution. But it is not. Random mutation is impossible, and even if you politely ignore that it is impossible, it is extremely unlikely. Several times over. Today’s Christians are so obsessed with proving they are no longer Jesusians that they tell ridiculous stories just to prove it.)
Presuming that line existed which inerrantly grew into air-breathing Alexandra, what about the other elements? There are more elements and combinations of elements in existence than the “just nitrogen and oxygen” composing most of Earth’s air. While the Alexandra-line evolved, there would be other Alexandra-like creatures evolving.
The childish “Screw you, Dad!” narratives of parental-rejection shows Earthlings sociologically justifying the formation of Bangist Christianity out of Jesusian Christianity’s seed. As Bangism is actually just evolved Christianity, yet professes itself entirely different, Bangism’s attempt to repeatedly trumpet the difference is a case of the traditional take on “doth protest too much.” Like S.R.’s nonexistent girlfriend and life spent hanging out with all-males conjoined to his insistence that you not treat men like women, that is apparent.
Comments
Post a Comment