Evolution Third

Continued from Evolution Second.  

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?  The answer has been unobtainable for many people for a very long time.  But really, the answer was always there, waiting to back up any handsome man, and any other people, too, because He’s so great like that!  

So I ask again: how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?  The answer, of course, is “Jesus.”  He is always there—always—and He will back up any man who bends down in prayer to Him.  No matter what kind of man.  Or, if it’s a woman, He’ll send an angel eventually to pat her on the head.  (Normal protocol for angels is that they have to be invisible and you can’t see or hear them.)  

That was one of the many great things about Jesusian Christianity: that it made sure everyone knew that people were universal; i.e. that they could all be members of the religion, exactly like the weird passion seen now in Bangists that everyone can immigrate to the West.  Before Christianity, people believed that where people lived—where the ancestors of those people had lived and so on back—made a difference.  That it mattered.  Changing that was one of the really important thing which Jesus did: with His Christianity, He made sure people understood that give me your tired, your poor, your wretched refuse yearning to collect social welfare checks, and so on.  

What could be causing society to decay?  Well, who could Decay be?  Who says that everyone is the same, claims to be super moral and super deserving because of a completely fake bad thing that didn’t happen, and uses that to get inside and break things down?  It is such a random mystery.  But whatever you do, you must remember that the answer to the question “How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?” is indisputably “Jesus.”  

So, back to evolution: 

Calling the verse a uni-verse, united verse, downplays the differences that create life.  By championing universalist religions, Decay has infected Earth with various forms of characteristic-disregarding reverence, including Jesusian and then Bangist Christianity.  Note the similarity between “universe” and the “universalist” dogma: the false “union” implied by each is a common deception.  Consider also the “American Civil War,” in which a military invasion and occupation were said to represent a caring good thing because it made there be a union.  Usican attacks on Iraq were characterized as being overall good things because they brought the gift of democracy.  Like an abusive spouse arguing that he is saving “our marriage” by violently forcing it, arguments of how good is united versalism often include a terrible coercion.  

French schemes to depopulate the peasantry during the “French Revolution” are similar.  As with wannaba supervillains today, their murderous madness is explained away, people willing to re-re-explain whenever those monumentally evil people let something vile slip.  Like the very many deaths that enabled Jesusian Christianity’s expansion, plots to kill many people for the purported good of all are normal for universalism.  Today, most people still think it was consensual advancement when Europe became Christian.  

Think of the official story of those kooky pagans gradually, country by country or region by region, deciding freely to send their tax dollars and children to spend-happy active pedophiles, because those former pagans so loved the idea of letting immigrants into their society, changing their culture, renaming their holidays, being ruled by a new class of inbred families (nobles), and adopting a southern philosophy focused on obeying the precepts recounted in the story of a foreign wise man.  Ridiculous!  Consider how the desires and trials of people now could be later rewritten by the liars we see today: the people demanded immigration, changing their society, being ruled by a Middle Eastern philosophy, etc.  In fact, Europeans fought hard for their freedom, area by area, and the various wars formally called disagreements about the nuances of liberal democracy we mean about how to best worship the rabbi were wars of conquest.  When deceived people descended from Deep Europe today advocate rabbi-worship, they are engaging in an incredibly foul besmirchment of their forebears.  

The recognition that many Jesusian Christians have noticed that random evolution would not possibly create organisms designed for the Earth environment has led to many arguments.  Those arguments have been had and re-had many times.  Although both the “an invisible rabbi in the sky did it” and the “it was random” sides are both the same sort of ridiculous, in this era the non-Jesusian side has typically had more formalized education, more money, and better jobs.  This has made agreeing with the media portrayal of the argument an easy task.  However, remember that over 1,600 years of those same sort of people would have a majority agreeing that the other side had clearly won the argument because it was more rational.  (After all, the other side accepts that Christ died for your sins.)  

Even if applied to only one species, “random evolution” is an impossible faith.  Random evolution is not only extremely mathematically unlikely, which it is in regards design of organs suited to Earth habitats, but truly impossible, which it is in regards of organs being too large to evolve at the speed permitted by random mutation.  The fittest do survive, the unfit dying, but the mutations that produce the fittest happen with environmental correspondence.  Without such, a truly random evolution would be impossible, taking many more years than that which the fossil record, and the life of the planet itself, shows evolution here took.  

As the environment interacts with the forces that shape mutation during reproduction, it also harshly penalizes outliers.  E.g., those who refuse to breathe oxygen or have offspring go extinct.  This is why, in ages brighter than this, exclusive imitation meiosis and belief in invisible people who cared about you would be considered mental illnesses.  

Imagine an Earth where evolution was truly random and offspring happened so quickly that it worked.  Posit animals who have sex a million times a day, give birth a million times a day, and every single organism thus born turns out healthy and grown, ready to be a parent tomorrow.  Even accounting for that, they would have to do it more often and give birth more often to make the faith of random evolution work.  Such are the requirements of Lord Randomus.  

It is extremely difficult—impossible—for most Earthlings to conceive of the current religion as in error.  That is because those religions serve as the guiding force for the cycling of the environment.  Like some idiot running around with an empty glass trying to catch all the rain and make the rain not get his things wet, trying to make the environment not be an environment is not going to work.  The majority of components of that environment—the people there, “here” if we’re talking about Earth—will believe what they must to cause their environment to change.  It is a delusion that you can employ evidence or arguments to make something else happen; to make them think differently.  

This type of human behavior is not new.  Again, reflect upon the fact that Europeans spent more than 1,600 years making and enforcing laws for the avowed purpose of pleasing an invisible rabbi who lived in the sky.  All the while the humans flattered themselves by insisting they had free will.  So they are still behaving—just like human on Earth.  Hearing that popular takes on evolution are impossible will call up to mind, ironically, Christianity—albeit Jesusian rather than Bangist, with the latter very firmly believing that they are beyond, and seeing right through, the stupidity of the former.  

Earth has far more than one species: all have been designed by the environment to live in earthly fluids or gases.  Like the impossibility of even one species so evolving randomly, the impossibility of all of them doing so together is an even more flagrant impossibility.  Such is the way of Christianity: it is not just impossible, but extravagantly, ridiculously so.  God cancan’t make a rock so big He can’t move it.  Claiming to believe any given religion in defiance of possibility, or without evidence, is the “faith” that must necessarily form the cornerstone of a religion.  Having faith that Christ died for your sins is just like having faith that one group of people will score the same as another group of people on standardized tests—there is no evidence of either, but they have proven themselves very compelling stories.  The fossil record disproves evolution-disregarding “mud-sculpture in Africa” and “random mutation.”  Yet both the Out of Africa and anti-Earth denial of environmental correspondence persist.  

The current Earthly fascination with Bangist “random” evolution is the same as the Earthly fascination with earlier Jesusian dogmas.  The faithful deny that they are anything but learned as to the things that really matter, deferring to purported experts who are supposedly performing works great and significant to validate the faith.  Because of these works, paired with their unavoidable understanding that offspring more resemble that offspring’s parents than some hypothetical human norm, people feel validated in their faith, and may cite it often but not think much about it.  

There are not enough stars and planets in the known verse for it to be even a 0.0001 x 1/googol % chance that life developed randomly on any one of them.  Life on Earth that randomly developed Earth-air-respirating lungs has a smaller chance.  Even had that incredibly unlikely chance happened, there would still have been not enough time.  Evolution cannot be random.  The current Bangist dogma is a falsity, and like other centuries dominated by dogma, people will scorn, dismiss, spit upon, and burn to death heretics.  The eagerness of N.A.T.O. to mass-murder people who don't have the type of government N.A.T.O. likes (universalist democracy) lubricates the wheels of so many engines of death.  

(A country that has a sovereign is a country that has non-execution voting for a premier who serves for life.  N.A.T.O. says it wants democracy, but really, it rejects democracy unless N.A.T.O. approves of the term limits and frequency of showy elections.  When a country rejects frequent elections and inefficient fast turnover, it gets called non-democratic and a lot of people are murdered.  The impression that "the people don't have a voice in government" is a liar's balm provided by some extremely untrustworthy people who are all but guaranteed to lie.)  

Modernity confuses the issue.  Modern humans often like to think, “Oh, burning heretics alive?  Kooky religious wackos did that in the past, but we’re advanced now!”  What they are missing is that, in wars to spread democracy, jet planes drop bombs that cause infants to be burned alive.  The experience is very bad and sometimes painful for those infants, and very monstrous of the doers.  

Do not disregard the intensity of religion.  For hundreds upon hundreds of years, Europe suffered the killing and torture of many people for imaginary slights to a sky-person who didn’t exist (S.R.).  As the years advanced, people continued to think they were much more advanced than their victims, and so their killing and torturing was acceptable.  This killing and torturing was done in the service of universality; egalitarianism; brotherhood of all cells; etc.  For example, people might use advanced fighter-bombers to murder 10,000 non-combatants, women and babies, in order to mandate that the survivors engaged in centralized debt-based banking, feminism, and voting.  The pain caused to the survivors, such as having shrapnel embedded in the body, losing a limb, having loved ones die, etc., is often quite great, but perhaps cannot compete with the hands-on torture that modern “soldiers” conduct.  The silliness of murdering people to protect people is tantamount to the silliness of murdering people to please the lord of peace.  

This is why various myths should not be quietly accepted and/or supported.  The insanities of the dark age conjoin with great pain and killing.  While believing, “There was no Jesus” or “There was no <other fictional story of badness/killing>” is difficult, it is refusing to conform to an utterly monstrous system.  A narrative of great fictional suffering (like the fake Passion of Jesus Christ), even were it nonfiction, does not justify horrors.  I.e., even had there been a Passion, even had any of the other BS happened, it would not even come close to remotely justifying a hundredth of the things that have been done because of that theoretical Passion.  

Along with false stories about really bad badness happening, “now is so important that all time before didn’t exist,” and “everyone is African,” the claim that “evolution was beyond our understanding” is recurrent.  Like other biblical similarities, it is difficult to see.  For example, how mean it was, how bad it was, the great suffering of the people expelled from Paradise for eating an apple—Adam and Eve—mirrors other biblical-type stories of fake suffering; stories of suffering that never happened (like the fake Passion of Jesus Christ).  The flooding of the world as punishment, deistic firebombing of cities, slavery in Egypt, wandering homeless in the desert, and Passion of the Christ—all are the same thing.  None of these things happened, but stories describing these fictional things were crafted, and researched for lifetimes by officially smart people with lotsa degrees, in order to spend many years serving as moral guideposts.  Like “now is so important that all time before now didn’t happen,” “everyone is African,” and “evolution is random,” stories about things that never happened are an ongoing component of Christianity.  

(Creating enough lies about fake bad things having happened is indicative of psychosis, and the Bible shows this: it is so about fake bad things.  If you feel that any big narratives of bad things are fake, that can show you a similarity between that and the stories in the Bible.  It can be difficult to give up the story of Jesus, but remember that many other human beings have spent their lives believing in stories of fake bad things.)  

Prior deity-based religions were laughably preferenced toward Earth, with Earth often posited as the center of the “universe.”  The worship of Lord Randomus (reverence for philosophical claims so stupid that personifying them is appropriate) so popular among today’s learned ones operates using assumptions that are impossible, mathematically impossible, and very Earth-focused.  The ridiculousness of the “randomly on Earth!” claim makes clear that Earth is the one special place where such an unlikely spate of nonsense happened.  (Up is down, left is right, and mammoths evolved randomly.  Haha; if mammoth had actually mutated randomly, there wouldn’t have been even enough time to do one leg and part of the butt—nor certainly the whole butt.)  Just like last time, if we don’t think much about the numbers, and have faith in the long times and people who are not officially called pedophiles but are called experts, we can believe the story is true.  

Many stars have planets.  Many galaxies have many stars.  Stars sometimes have planets with hydrogen and carbon mixed with other stuff, and various big things deflect or otherwise draw away asteroids.  The processes of life on Earth would be duplicated elsewhere, and although humans use radio signals, there are many other ways life might evolve, by lots of different timetables, that would not use earthly things.  It is anthropocentric—narcissistic—for Earthlings to claim that life in their galaxy is them-focused, that the time available to all galaxies is them-focused, etc.  

Random “evolution” is as aforementioned impossible.  Humans possess bodies including trillions of cells.  These humans often recognize that they more resemble their parents in some ways than they resemble the people across the street.  Thus, armed with a microscope and calculator, they could determine how much time cells would’ve needed to evolve to produce their great grandparents’ great grandparents.  Many pieces of Earth are available to be dated to show that the Earth is far younger than the astronomical quantities of time a random evolution would’ve needed to luckily occur, ergo discounting the power of bandwagons it continues to be easy to disprove Earthly religion.  

This is why, before Christianity, the Cro Magnon’s descendants had observed a Copernican-style circulation of the Earth about the sun and posited a cyclical and heterogenous, rather than a (“progressive”) homogenous, universalist, outer space.  They were correct, and the religion that took over—Christianity—was and is incorrect.  The movement of southern populations into northern territories accomplished incredible narcissism, as well as incredible brutality.  

The numbers involved seem so large, and the certificates of wise achievement granted so profound, that most people continue to relax into the comforting embrace of the mob.  More pressingly, the mob can and does actually kill people—many, many people, sometimes in particularly ghoulish ways—to enforce stated agreement in universalism.  

The faithful belief that “random” mutations created organisms possessing organs which work only in specifically Earthly environments is far more personified and stupid than the belief that the creator of a thousand galaxies is shaped like an Earthly human.  It is very difficult for Bangist Christians to realize that those Bangist Christians themselves are just as religious as Jesusian Christians.  

Not only is it actually impossible, and also “all but” impossible for random mutation to have produced the evolution we see in our fossil record, that example is compounded by the elementary table.  Earthly air includes primarily nitrogen and oxygen.  All of our mathematically impossible examples have presumed that Alexandra developed, randomly, exactly the cells suited for breathing Earth-air.  Breathing it in every single one before, after, and during the many millions of mutations necessary to develop the new organ.  There are, though, at least 98 elements, making it the 1 in 98! chance each mutation of the lung that we referenced above (i.e. that 1 in about 1.5 googol not just once but hundreds of millions of times.  It is impossible for the mutation of cells to be random, but even if we ignore that impossibility, there is still an incredibly small chance).  A 1 in about 1.5 googol chance just once is a very, very small chance, but that chance not once but hundreds of millions of times is much smaller.  

(Note also that this is another generous chance, given that fractional quantities have all been rounded away.  A “random” evolution, could such happen, would include lungs designed for 99.6% gaseous hydrogen, 99.483% gaseous hydrogen, and so on.)  

Hospitals/midwives do not regularly lose babies and say, “Oh, he wanted to breathe ammonia smoke.  Bummer about evolution.”  Not even once has this happened in the history of humanity.  

In actuality, some of the “environment” in environmental correspondence is the environment of the organ in which the cells will be placed.  I.e., if a lung is being mutated in to breathe Earth-air, new cells do not face a random chance of 1/98! every single mutation, but nearly 1/1, i.e. not a chance but a certainty.  Just like bears feel like hibernating at certain times, and like you feel like sleeping at certain times, cells can mutate at a much greater rate than one per a few trillion when it is time for change (the change we call evolution) to happen.  As with Jesusian Christianity, the Bangist Christian religion greatly represses scientific advancement.  Earthlings would have a much better understanding of evolution if they were not so committed to their faith in Lord Randomus.  

Back to 1/98! every single mutation.  Even if this incredible small chance happened—every single time out of the millions and millions of cells necessary to create the lung—there should exist, alongside the successful Alexandrae, the unsuccessful.  The official story holds that the line of Alexandra relentlessly, through the randomness that is now supposed to be holy to us, developed the lung meant to breathe Earthly air.  It then crawled out of the primordial soup and took a breath not of water but of air.  The development of that Alexandra proved that, before that lung was complete, Alexandra could survive with the incomplete organ inside that organism’s body.  

How?  Well, when the small 100-million cell lung was being evolved at the supercharged rate of 5 cells per reproduction, 366 healthy reproductions per year, it wasn’t yet functional, yet did not cause Alexandrae to go extinct, else the project would have failed.  Up until that lung was complete and ready to breathe air and make Alexandra an evolutionary success, it was not a mortal burden.  A lung 5% complete, 15% complete, 70% complete, and so forth was taking up calories and space, a burden to movement and mating, yet still not killing the organisms that were developing it but permitting successful mating to provide for offspring with that trait.  At the incredibly multiplied rate of 5 perfect mutations per reproduction, that 100-million-cell lung would take 20 million reproductions to occur, during all of which Alexandra must survive or else the project would be completely destroyed.  

Far too generously for randomized evolution, we assumed that Alexandra would successfully reproduce once every day.  More generously, posit also that her new lung can begin working at 90% completion, rather than at 100%—unlikely, but again, we’re being ridiculously generous toward the “natural selection of traits randomly mutated” religion.  

18 million.  Presuming the lung can begin working to respirate Earthly air after a mere 18 million reproductions, one per day, that’s a little over 49K years for one organ.  

Continued in Evolution Fourth.