Evolution Second

Continuing from Evolution First.  

Besides the African elephant, consider also a grizzly bear.  E.g. those organisms are composed of more than five trillion cells.  The time to evolve a grizzly bear would far exceed the 13 billion years required to evolve a creature smaller than a human, just as the time to randomly evolve a blue whale would have taken many more billions of years.  

In short, this means that even if random, undirected mutation had caused local changes, there was not nearly enough time for it to have done so—not enough time by far.  Just as the first famous anti-evolution fable of “Sky Rabbi made it” is stupid and wrong, very simple mathematics wholly disproves the stupid, wrong fable of “it just happened through randomness.”  

It is popular to believe what is currently popular, and many people considered intellectually sound have done so, but that does not mean it is correct.  Years ago, people with many degrees, notable achievements, international connections, speakers of multiple languages etc., claimed that a Christ was the cause of it all.  Their achievements do not produce evidence.  There was no invisible rabbi in the sky who had made the world through a giant explosion in outer space, and it was incredibly, tellingly stupid to insist that there was.  An atheistic person not considered very smart now is correct compared to a person considered very smart then who ascribed it all to an invisible rabbi in the sky.  Similarly, a not-very-smart person of the hypothetical future taking environmental correspondence into account would be correct compared to a person considered very smart now who ascribed it all to randomness.  

It is incredibly, tellingly stupid to insist that evolution happened via randomness, yet that is considered very intelligent now.  Very respected people, with a lot of education, will say this monumentally stupid, impossible thing.  Billions of children will be taught that monumentally stupid, impossible thing.  

It doesn’t seem to match, yet so long ago, and for a long time, very respected people with a lot of education were praying in front of crowds without the crowd thinking it was indicative of a major problem with that person's mind.  Those praying people were quite calmly closing their eyes to think words inside their heads, doing so with the tacit approval of the crowd for seeking the best wishes of an invisible rabbi who lived in the sky.  

In addition, it is now viewed as problematic by some when a group of people is spending a lot of money in order to import and house the people who will displace them.  Yet, such behavior is normal for White people.  Europe has spent over 1,000 years importing enablers and tools of decay, rewriting European legal codes, and formally murdering (executing) people for using magic or otherwise doubting that an invisible rabbi lives in the sky who should be obeyed.  

For over a thousand years Europeans were acting this way.  It is not at all surprising, but is quite expected, for White people to believe very forcibly in very stupid things.  Random evolution, like the embrace of formal rabbi-worship, like the embrace of the incredibly ridiculous and murderous stories of Genesis and Exodus, is normal for them.  

(It can seem like a horrible nightmare now that Europeans are literally paying to feed people who are taking their things, but ever since Christianity took Europe, that kind of behavior is normal.  For a very long time, White people have been giving away little bits of their communities, their spirituality, their legislation, their art, etc. to the descendants of people who were from somewhere else.)  

Earth is covered by animals evolved to dwell in its environments, all of which are the descendants of lines that have developed numerous organs made just for those environments.  These organisms have been called different species incapable of reproducing with other species and sharing the purportedly accidental benefits of random mutation.  There is not enough time for even one of these species to have randomly evolved, much less all of them.  

There was not enough time.  Not even close.  As Sky Rabbi-based African mud-sculpting is wrong, random evolution is wrong.  Even if every accidental, random mutation had happened in perfect order and in the perfectly desired way—which is to say, attuned by chance for Earth—there was not enough time.  If not a single stillbirth had happened during one organism’s evolution and things had been having almost constant sex, there still was not nearly enough time.  

Many people renowned as quite intelligent have lived decades and died claiming to believe that a special rabbi lived above the clouds, having created all life below via divine magic.  People renowned as intelligent have also lived decades and died claiming to believe that everything randomly came to be and that doubters were religious fools while they themselves were very smart and not at all religious.  By time and place, it has been powerfully popular to believe one or the other falsity.  Many humans have also lived believing that Earth is or is not surely the host to a cruel people who advocate death for others.  As the saying goes, “Truth hurts.”  

People are incredibly prone to believing in falsities, and as with the "surely not" above, they prefer reassuring falsities.  As Genesis/Bang is false, and as random evolution is false, they are still remarkably popular among humans.  Remarkably popular, in the case that humans will mass murder people or send armed men to take away children to be instructed in schools about Genesis/Bang and various forms of creationism/randomism (think about humans in 900 A.D. making sure that children are saved from ignorant parents by being raised in an environment where they will be taught by educated people about how wonderful S.R. is, or its modern equivalent making sure that children are saved from ignorant parents by being raised in an environment where they will be taught by educated people about how genes mutate randomly during reproduction).  I.e. as extremely as humans can behave.  Christianized peoples will think themselves doing the right thing by taking children away from their parents to be in what they think of as a proper environment.  

As mentioned earlier, between 10-20 billion years refers to the time simply to “randomly evolve” one organism from Earth-water-respirating to Earth-air-respirating.  Much more time would be required to evolve single-celled organisms to multi-celled ones, bacteria to small fish, and small fish to large fish first.  Because Earth’s fossil record shows that organisms have evolved, Bangist Christians enjoy debating Jesusian Christian Creationists, because all the evidence is on their side that life on this planet was not instantly (or over six days, or over 6,000 years, or over more depending on the year and the modern hybrid creature of Jesusianism with Bangism--it is amazingly extra pitiful, stupid-frosting on the stupid-cake, when modern people say they support a rabbi not only for European tradition but whose nonsense-stories were all metaphors because six days really means a few billion years) created by S.R.  Survival of the fittest is undoubtedly true, yet by it being true it does not bestow truth upon completely disparate concepts.  Bangist Christians fear any other argument than that offered by their partners in crime—Jesusian Christian Creationists—because all the evidence stands with environmental correspondence.  

That is what the random mutation, random evolution component of Bangism misses: environmental correspondence.  Protestant Christianity and variants attempted (with superficial success) to reorganize Jesusian Christianity into a less-exclusive, non-Catholic worship of the invisible sky rabbi who could save you from what he had made.  I.e. they made an even more universal universalism!  “Catholic” means “universal,” which was quite an appropriate name for the religion of a universal hero who would remove material people from a material world, and thus all the countries, welfare checks, and vaginas in that continent/world.  However, the Protestants wanted to worship a rabbi who had said to properly worship him you had to belong to his church.  There were and are some arguments about who was right, and like Sunni/Shia Muslims, the division between certain kinds of universal universalism were hypocritical and stupid, yet many people for a very long time have found them incredibly compelling—and still do.  

The inherent hypocrisy of universalism causes its manifestations to undergo regular reformations.  Like the Protestant/Catholic division, the split between Sunni/Shia is just another inheritance contest.  The respective sides feel that the people in charge of the official place were really following the rules or really doing badly at not following them.  

(Sunnistants sorry Sunni Muslims feel that the first three leaders of Islam after Mohammed were legitimate, Shia Muslims feel those first three weren’t legitimate.  Protestant/Catholic and Shia/Sunni are like the way that feminism was entirely about women’s rights until it was trumped by the right of ethnic minorities to not be punished for rape when they use the vaginas of women who don’t want them to do that.  Actually, feminism was just another trick, meant to attack a culture by changing the expectation that women deserved the right to protect their bodies from rape.  It really wasn't about women having the right to work etc.; it was about women being alone so they could be easily targeted by predators seeking vaginas.  Just like Jesusianism was definitely not gay, feminism was definitely against rape: the horror is discovered later, after all those little boys say what the holy men were doing, and all those women find out that independence was just a trick.  As stated, Protestants/Catholics and Sunni/Shia found out, even if they don't think/say so, that the prince/religion of peace really involved a lot of fighting/dying.)  

Like it pretends that it is definitely not a continuance of the Christian religion, Bangist Christianity has held that it never has reformed.  Of course, though, as with how Abraham Lincoln wanted African-Americans to go back to Africa, what the faithful have wanted over time has varied greatly.  The pretense continues to be that dropping Yahweh (called either “Jesus” or “Allah” depending on time/place) makes things not a religion.  The indispensable commonality of universalism is what characterizes the faces of Torah-derivative religions.  

The incredible faith in the new Genesis, a.k.a. the Big Bang, is revelatory enough to itself designate the sect Bangist.  Christ’s fictional Passion serves as imaginary moral guidepost to Jesusians, showing like the other parts of the Bible the definitive definition of badness—who was treated the worst out of all the world.  With its own depictions of badness, Bangist Christianity continues that trend.  

Remember again the three components of Christianity: 

1) Everything began with a big orgasm in outer space; 

2) Everyone came from African ancestors; 

3) Very important bad things happened without leaving any evidence that they happened (like Jesus having His Passion in His True Loincloth on the True Cross).  

Earth’s religion of randomized evolution is easy to disprove.  Like fading religions of a moral god who (like a true masterful expert) provided for torture and child-rape, it is abundantly easy to disprove.  Infants get some horrible disease, suffer terrible pain, and then die, never able to be morally tested.  Even assuming that every other type of bad thing which happens here is fair in ways we cannot fathom due to our inferior mortal minds, the pre-talking suffering of a sickened infant occurs.  It is impossible for what happens on Earth to be part of a benevolent plan.  A malevolent plan, perhaps; an indifferent plan, perhaps; but, a benevolent plan, not possible.  

The dogma of random-faith and that of product placement both hold that there is free will and that it is an important ingredient of the test, therefore causing pain and death to an infant who makes loud noises no more than other infants disproves the former.  

There is not enough time for the theories of Lord Randomus to be remotely correct.  We have considered here an implausible acceleration of the process involving one healthy new offspring each day, and found that it would take over 13 billion years to successfully randomize even that one type of organism.  

Posit that, per Bangism, during that 13 billion years in which that one Earthling is evolving, must also change every other type of organism on Earth.  In so doing, such organisms must also produce no records of “false starts” or suchlike, e.g. animals which had been air-breathing but suddenly began re-evolving water-respirating lungs that grow on top of their heads.  

If evolution were random, the fossil record would show lots of that kind of stuff--everything still could have turned out just like you know it, but the fossil record would show a superabundance--or, being generous, just one--of (a) specimen(s) with things developed in the wrong place.  The way that Bangist Christians respond to the fossil record showing that their faith is not correct is similar to the way that Jesusian Christians did so in the sense that the evidence was disavowed/ignored.  When presented with the fossil record, Jesusians claimed that Satan had made it to try to deceive people against believing the Bible, didn't worry about it that much, and just went on as before.  In the same way that their attempt at justifying morality is poorer in quality than that offered by the rabbi-obsessed Jesus freaks, Bangists skipped right to the step of ignorance, just trusting in the big number of however many years old was the Earth to make the issue not get noticed (to be fair, they probably didn't notice it themselves).  

The rules of randomness themselves demand that even with ridiculously implausible occurrences like organs developing in coordination without a master plan, there is no way to reconcile unmotivated change with the things we can observe.  

How many elements exist in this verse?  Let us limit our inquiry, again extremely helpfully to random evolution, by saying merely 98.  Were evolution random, potential future lung cells would evolve only to die as soon as they were created as parts of an incomplete process, or to kill Alexandra prior to reproduction.  They would do this by being, essentially, a tumor of cells that took calories for nourishment, blocked circulation etc., while disallowing other cellular processes to use that space.  In truth, a new organ evolving inside Alexandra’s body would be a massive, mortal problem until it was complete and could see action by respirating air and allowing Alexandra to enter new environments and pursue new sources of nourishment.  A lung 99% complete, and a lung at every prior percentage and subdivision of percentage of formation would be a dangerous, weighty tumor, a burden upon its owner.  For illustration, imagine running your fastest to catch prey, or gathering as many berries as you can before the hunters find you, with a heavy lump of cells attached to one of your legs.  

“Random” evolution, the current local faithfad, is impossible in many ways.  Not the least of these ways is that any organism in the process of randomly mutating a new feature would make it impossible for itself to survive during any intermediate stage of evolving something later hypothetically useful.  Even if, when the final mutation had randomly occurred and the new organism took its first breath of air, an organism with the 90%-complete lung would be at a massive, terminal, likely fast-acting disadvantage.  (A survival and reproductive disadvantage because of possessing the mutation of something that would, later, be helpful.  The official evolution story now is not in accordance with survival of the fittest.  It actually says that survival of the un-fittest would have worked.  That is one of the other ways to tell that the current version of the Christian religion is stupid.  Bangism is worse than Jesusianism!)  

At least 98 elements are in this verse (there are more than 98, but to be gentle with the local religion, imagine only 98, lest the numbers look even worse for “random mutation”).  Were evolution random, the accidental preparation of a lung would far more likely be of a lung not specifically prepped for breathing Earthly air.  Rather, it would be of a lung that, randomly, was prepared to process a random element, or more likely a random combination of elements.  Ignoring this is, like Jesusian Christianity, anthropocentric.  

Earthly air is a combination of gases, including nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and bits of a few other things (such as neon and argon).  Earthly air-lungs are perfectly suited to breathe it (For discussion purposes, Earthly lungs are perfectly suited to breathe Earthly air.  Of course, they sometimes have something go wrong and kill people, such as via drowning or smoke-inhalation, but again for purposes of discussion imagine only ones that are always used properly).  Random evolution, being undirected by some benevolent force, would have evolved, in addition to lungs that by chance could breathe Earth-air perfectly well, lungs that would respirate pure hydrogen gas, pure actinium gas, pure aluminum gas, and so forth.  An evolution by chance would also produce lungs suited to breathing 51% gaseous actinium and 49% gaseous aluminum, 72% gaseous hydrogen and 28% gaseous platinum, and so forth.  Such lungs would not, of course, work, in the sense that most Earthly organisms are designed to require oxygen, and the extraction of oxygen from air is part of the necessary respirative function.  However useless from our perspective as life-favoring entities, “random” evolution would produce such organisms.  Even though they would, of necessity, die off, the remains of such organisms, had they ever existed, would appear in Earth’s fossil record.  

Remains of such lungs never appear in that record.  The available evidence shows only creatures being evolved which are suited to Earth’s environment.  Were evolution happening randomly, for every fossil of some predecessor there would be at least a million fossils of newborns with a half-finished lung suited to processing a mix that includes something like some part of aluminum—and there are not.  

Sadly hilarious, in truth, that Christian creationism is more logical.  If a rabbi had created this planet at the center of existence, and created humans and all animals to breathe its atmosphere, it is a mathematical likelihood that those things’d be able to breathe here.  Without Yahweh-Christ, but with Lord Randomus and His Saiunce instead, what we see is impossible.  Not possible.  Apossible.  It is not an arguable matter whether nature selecting the best for survival is true; rather, it is impossible that nature did so.  

When confronted by the fossil record, Jesusians claimed that Satan had created it to deceive humans.  With ironic humor, we can see that Bangists would benefit from the same type of thing, because the fossil record is a huge chunk of evidence disproving their religion.  However, the Jesusians had ready, as part of their canon, a bad invisible creature who had manufactured the fossil record to fake people.  Bangists, by contrast, have a weaker story: one that doesn’t come preloaded with a bad guy.  

How many results should a process of evolution by random mutation have produced?  A factorial is the proper way to begin—only to begin—to express such a result.  The factorial we will use takes it very easy on random mutation, dealing in round numbers instead of in the percentage variations which random mutation would produce.  

(For example, random mutation would have produced not only lungs which breathed 60% gaseous ammonia and 40% gaseous nitrogen, but 46.2% gaseous ammonia and 53.8% gaseous nitrogen, 45.3% gaseous ammonia and 54.7% gaseous nitrogen, and so on.  And, of course, whether random evolution prepared to extract oxygen from gaseous forms, rather than fluids or solids, makes randomness much less likely to work.  True randomness would make random evolution even less likely than in our examples—questions on the philosophy of impossibility would become even more profound.  For, the mathematical impossibility reached via so much generosity to Lord Randomus would meet yet more such impossibilities.  Note that the term "mathematical impossibility" is used when something is likely to occur once in much longer than the time allowed, which in this case is the life of the Earth.  So, say that it is mathematically impossible for something to have occurred once in a trillion-trillion years.  A trillion is 1,000,000,000,000, and a trillion-trillion is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.  So, a trillion-trillion is better put as 10e^24.  Remember that when you go on.  10e^24)  

What this means is that, were mutations during reproduction random, lungs would be produced which were designed to breathe 100% gaseous hydrogen, 99% gaseous hydrogen and 1% gaseous aluminum, 98% gaseous hydrogen and 2% gaseous aluminum, and so forth.  (Such lungs wouldn’t of course work or even get tested with a single breath, but they would evolve.  Randomly.)  

When early Jesusians tried to explain things they hadn’t explained with an earlier story so they told of their god as being more powerful to explain it, they wrote themselves into the trap of Jesus being the creator of all things which included Satan and evil.  That kind of mistake also left them with the question of God making a rock so big He couldn’t move it.  It is similar with the religious nonsense of random mutation now.  Things that are truly random would create random possibilities.  

Incomplete lungs must be able to exist during the evolutionary process, because lungs perfectly suited to breathing Earth-air were absolutely necessary—if you’re a human reading this after ^CE2000, you have a pair yourself.  With mutations happening at a much lower rate than one cell per one trillion cells, lungs must necessarily be incomplete for several reproductive cycles, yet not cause death.  For, if incomplete lungs caused death, they would not permit maturity and sexuality of the organism with those incomplete lungs’ plans in its germ line.  Therefore they would not permit reproduction which can pass on the trait “lungs which can almost but not quite breathe Earthly air.”  

The fossil record should ergo possess a superabundance of fossils evincing partially complete Earth-air lungs, which it does not.  As with other forms of Christianity, faith in Lord Randomus (remember: we're just personifying principles for simplicity) relies on people not being able to investigate “a lot of stuff” out there.  Rather, things like the Big Bang and random evolution survive on people believing that “experts” have reviewed those things and that the media reports without an agenda.  

The factorial of what type of lungs would’ve been developed randomly is expressed 98! which is the mathematical expression of 98 x 97 x 96 x 95 x …and so on, down to … x 3 x 2 x 1.  What this means is that, even limiting the totals to our periodic table (things Earthlings have officially discovered and acknowledged thus far), each random mutation, if through the nigh-impossibly tiny chance which mutates a healthy lung cell in the correct place, should have a chance of developing cells suited for respirating a combination of elements, which chance numbers 1 in 9.42689e^153.  As discussed before, that latter number is mathematical notation for a 9 followed by 153 digits, which is more than a googol.  

(Such number [a googol] is 10e^99, a.k.a. 10⁹⁹.  One in a googol is so tiny it is not reasonable to think it often happens, being something that would randomly occur perhaps once every 10⁹⁹ years.  Jesusian Christianity’s “an invisible rabbi lives in the sky, has never once been seen by anyone in an airplane, and really cares about our morals” is much more likely.)  

For random mutation to work, the chance that a randomly mutated cell would be a lung cell, and would be in the right place (the right place to function as part of a lung), is already sub-microscopically small amidst an elephant herd of possibilities.  When the possibilities are perhaps a few million out of far more than a googol that the new cell will be, like all those before it subject to the same chance, successful at such a tiny chance rate at breathing the correct combination of elements, it gets worse.  The possibility is further reduced.  Now it is not finding a sub-microscopic quantity amidst an elephant herd, but finding a sub-microscopic quantity somewhere on a continent.  With a broken microscope.  

The chance that such a thing would occur in a “universe” with a trillion galaxies, each possessing a trillion planets on which a trillion creatures were successfully reproducing every day, is far less than it occurring once on one of those planets once a googol years.  For one cell, this chance, out of a lung that requires far more than one cell to operate.  Earth now has many species of air-breathing animals, and it is not only mathematically impossible but incredibly unlikely for one such species to randomly develop, much less many.  At the same time.  

(Again, in all these examples using Earth-timekeeping, defining “day” as “the time the Earth rotates.”)  

The possibility grows smaller when other factors are considered.  All this time, we’ve been positing that the proper mutation happens, as desired, each reproduction, and that it happens in the proper place.  An organism with five trillion cells, evolving an air-respirating lung inside its torso, has a very small chance, per random mutation, at evolving a cell in the correct spot or a very big chance at evolving a cell in the wrong spot.  Say, evolving the cell where it should be to continue constituting the in-progress lung.  Such organism also has a much bigger chance of evolving the perfect cell in the incorrect spot, say somewhere on the bottom of a foot.  There is, perhaps, one chance out of a trillion that the evolution in cellular planning effected through deoxyribonucleic acid (D.N.A.) will be randomly placed correctly one time, and one must multiply that one in a trillion chance against itself 100 million times to estimate the chance that new mutations will, time after time, be properly placed to permit the growth of the new lung.  

One in a 100 million times a few trillion is a large, likely chance when compared to the one in over 1.5 googol to which the random mutation of one species’ lung is otherwise subject.  That would be a far, far smaller chance in actuality were the mutation to include developments attuned to fractional tenths, hundredths, and so forth.  An organism evolving random lungs suited to breathing 99.16% gaseous ammonia, for example, would be unable to breathe Earthly air.  That infinitesimal chance becomes even smaller when considering that the water-based organism must also evolve at the same time land-limbs, land-eyes, land-skin, and so forth.  These evolutions must happen in a timely fashion to permit the organism to then dwell on land.  If you think you can tell that piscine scales are different than canine skin, you can tell why random evolution is impossible.  Similarly, if you can imagine how well your eyes would do staying open in the ocean 16 (or 24) hours a day for a month, you can imagine why land-eyes must be evolved.  It is, of course, very damaging for fish to have their eyes open for just one hour on the air above dry land, but a void of icthyologist-opthalmologists has not produced studies on exactly how bad it is.  (The prestigious Journal of Icthyological Opthalmology will start publishing regular articles when test scores between groups of different kinds of humans start to become equal.)  

The chance then becomes one in several googol googol that it could even once happen.  If you are familiar with fractions, then you know that is a very small chance.  Even if such a possibility had been randomly attained on this one planet out of such a tiny sampling of a few hundred in the nearby unseen hypothetical verse, there exists not enough time to effect these changes.  Not enough time exists in the life cycle of this planet, this star, nor this nearby verse entire to permit such a thing to have happened even once—and Earth has far more than one type of animal!  

Evolution is not random.  It is a religion to believe that the wise women and men with government-accredited degrees can make work the dogma of evolution by random mutation.  As with prior versions of Christianity, such a story requires faith, consensus, and people with many certificates of great intelligence participating in the delusion.  “Survival of the fittest” is basic and true, but “random mutation” is not.  “Survival of the un-fittest” is not.  

(The word verecundiam, which has been used for “reliance on authority,” has been associated with such ridiculous behavior.)  

Continued in Evolution Third.