The Dark Ages

With every year that passes, we grow closer to our Lord (Jesus, duh).  So many people hear Him gently singing to all the handsome men and everyone else too, and with each year we know more and more of His divine plans.  That is why there are fewer car wrecks every year, and fewer wars and stuff.  The U.S. hasn’t even had to declare war in several decades!  

Despite this, Ists say that it is still the Dark Ages!  See; here is proof:  

It is still the Dark Ages.  

This year correctly calls itself a year of the Christian Era.  It is propaganda, as it has been since Christianity’s beginning, that humans have improved.  The popular notions of social flattery that humans are now enlightened, that other people used to believe in sky women and sky men, are incorrect.  It is a pompous mistruth that people are different now.  They are still Christian, and it is difficult—for many people too difficult—to resist the ideatic virus which was designed specifically to be catching to Europeans.  

Not only the billions and billions of pounds/dollars/etc., but the socially enforced customs of several governments, and the mandatorily enforced (implied or enacted threat of the use of police and military forces), are employed to bolster the consensus.  As such, whenever evidence conflicts with the consensus, many White people will literally employ every method at their disposal against evidence.  

This type of behavior is not limited to White people without formal educations.  Many PhDs act the same way: they are still White people, despite their formal accomplishments, many of them subject to groupthink.  

Artistic endeavor is affected as well.  For centuries—literally centuries, such as the over 1,600 years that will be often cited here—painting and literature had to be expressing biblical characters/themes in order to be treated respectably; in order to be popular, known or remembered, or to even be created at all.  Far more than 10 generations of people making things about which other people could consider were confined to biblical topics—to Christianity.  

(Things are still the same way today, in that books and movies etc. become popular only when they reflect the current type of Christianity.  To pick something well known, the Harry Potter books/movies are an express statement of the goodness/correctness of universality and the badness/incorrectness of non-universality.  The “houses” into which students are placed, and those houses reflecting social differentiation, show that people are fundamentally good or bad depending on whether they are universal or not.  Characters portrayed as good people are universal and want to heterogenize society, while characters portrayed as bad people want to not heterogenize society.  The battle between Lord Voldemort and Harry Potter is a literal expression of White homogeneity being bad and a White person fighting for the goodness of heterogeneity.  Like Jesusian Christianity was designed to heterogenize Europe and get in immigrants by damaging protective homogeneity, focusing people not on their kin but on S.R., modern expressions of approved universalism, such as the Harry Potter series, are still pushing heterogeneity.)  

Artists who created great Christian depictions were sometimes able to create a few famous non-Christian depictions, but most were not.  The very popularly known Mona Lisa is, of course, not itself Christian, but only became famous because earlier works by the artist were quite Christian.  Consider also David, where a political protest—the showing of a purportedly biblical character in the nude with a non-cosmetically-mutilated (“uncircumcised”) penis—has been disregarded for a very long time, and the character's status as being from the history of the Bible focused on instead.  Little known is that Michelangelo copied David from the work of Donatello—Donatello’s statue showed the same thing and was also called David.  The succession of naked-man statues named “David” shows that like “the Protestant Rebellion” the attempt of Europeans to resist Christianity (to draw attention to healthy grown men without cosmetically mutilated penises showing thereby that cosmetic mutilation of male babies was not necessary as it has been often claimed)—is shown.  Michelangelo was making the same argument as Donatello and others whose names we do not know.  That was a long-running argument about cosmetically mutilating male babies and whether male genitals should be designed by Mother Nature or Father God.  Michelangelo’s statue is still widely known today, but the argument for why people cared about “this statue of some naked male” is forgotten.  Most people just assume that it’s famous because it's such a really amazingly good statue, as though there wasn’t quality human statuary before and after.  A lot of it.  As humankind’s development of the airplane and spacecraft were stymied by official rabbi worship for far over a thousand years, many aspects of Earthly humanity have been similarly stifled.  

Christianity is a massive crime.  The incredible number of deaths caused during the first few years of it, as well, of course, as the deaths and hurting on both sides caused from bringing the good word about the rabbi via colonialism, are this.  Additionally, the well-known hope of Truman that he can kill tens of thousands of women and children in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to better effect S.R.’s wishes is this same sort of thing.  An early Christian warning the leaders of a village in Europe that they must attack the inhabitants of another village to protect themselves is extremely likely.  

Lies like “they are planning to attack you” were probably used to spread rabbi-worship, just as they are used to spread universalism now (effecting wars now to spread democracy).  For example, a traveling merchant who lies, “Oh yeah, I was hidden and heard them say, ‘We need to kill them all,’” motivates theoretically defensive but truly offensive behavior that outsiders might never understand.  Our history of the expansion of Christianity still tells the lies: that she really wanted it.  

Records of village council meetings from ^CE226 were maybe never taken and certainly not available now.  However, considering the genetic constitution of advisors now and what they do to further their kinds’ interest at the expense of others, wars of times past that seem inexplicable can be quite understood.  As to Christianity, there is the official story, “They really wanted to worship a rabbi in the right way,” but if you doubt how compelling that nonexistent S.R. was, modern behavior of genetic groupings explains what happened.  

The insistence of a certain type of people in the U.S. that Iraqis needed to be massacred in order to protect everyone from Saddam’s W.M.D. is this.  As teaching people about democracy is supposed to be so good that it is just fine to kill a million people for that, the pattern of Christianity has been duplicated many times before.  The conjunction of murdering large numbers of human beings, siphoning off massive quantities of human work product to do so, and the ^CE2003 Iraq War illustrates this well.  

Think about the horrible similarity, exhibited in rationales.  The crusades were justified, “Feel good about doing these horrible things because now everyone there knows the proper way to avoid torture forever by the S.R.  You are really a hero.  All of you are heroes doing good.”  The way the ^CE2003 Iraq War was justified was very much the same.  It was, “Feel good about doing these horrible things because now everyone there knows the proper way to run countries and have women’s rights.  You are really a hero.  All of you are heroes doing good.”  In fact, it is debatable that the things called good are even actually good, and the similarity between the two is the horrible occurrences that attended both things.  As with child molestation, Jesusian Christianity was a terrible thing, and Bangist Christianity has been a terrible thing also.  Even if there were an invisible rabbi in the sky who wanted you to know about him, not even one crusade—not even one victim—is justified.  Similarly, if universalist democracy is that great, not even one war—not even one victim—is justified.  We can have separate debates about the goodness of democratic gubernatorial power, or being loved by the invisible rabbi in the sky, but those things are secondary.  One of Christianity’s many pretensions has been that those things are so important that they are worth doing horrible things to make a point.  

The many arguments in service of Christianity are nonsense, of course.  The crusaded survivors were “saved” only because many others were murdered.  Many centuries later, if there are still Earthlings, people will write that there were more “Christian wars” around now, which is really a cleanup.  The lots of Christian-motivated wars involved very many children hearing that they will never see mommy and daddy again and they will now take over the farm and worship a rabbi (or else they will be torture-killed).  ^CE2003 Iraq is exactly like this: the crusade survivors were given “liberal” democracy only because many were murdered.  Like what is still happening in the Middle East to this day, people are losing incredible things, changing their entire lives in response to horrible atrocities, losing limbs and suffering other terrible injuries that last for life, and that also happened to lots of people the next village over.  And the next.  And each one of the three after that.  It is a terribly dark narcissistic delusion that Europe just had to make sure that the land where the savior was born was safe and that Satan wasn’t stockpiling W.M.D.  The incredibly massive quantities of death, theft, and deception show what actually happened when happened massacres that are now called consensual wars caused by disagreement about how best to worship a rabbi.  That is why it is right to call these times the dark ages.