I Did it All Myself
Ists are saying such nonsense! What Ists are not getting is, like I said many times already, that humans now are really different than older humans. We do not make untrue things popular. Rather, we discover what is truly true. Believe it or not, Ists have characterized the way that Westerners now think they won a survival of the fittest competition as a rich kid ending up a rich adult and thinking he wasn’t being helped by family money the whole time. As though the bestest humans would act like that! Every little opportunity to get accepted to some institution/program, to get some job, to develop some blatant market, was so affected but an idiot can think it was all done solo, say Ists. It is the same way that they don't feel the love of Christ and all good men wanting to be with Him, and that they call that gay. As though wanting to be with a Divine Man forever instead of these evil hot chicks is gay when the Divine Man has rules against never doing gay things. Imagine!
(Men should consider how much they need rules against being with another man in order to not want to be with another man. It is a colossal giveaway of what Legacy Christianity was really about that it included a command to not do that. Of course, if a man would need to be following rules to not bugger other men, well, giant blinking signs advertise what he desires.)
Ists are the real idiots! Random evolution is so correct! If you have any questions about that, here are 6400 expertologists with PhDs in Expertology who say it definitely is the way things are.
We should have new taxes so that future children know not to think like Ists. Nowadays we don't teach kids about Jesus but about other things that are equally real. We are completely different.
(Again note the similarity between the current anti-evidence force-feeding for years of children in the West and the way the religious education of children in schools enforced anti-evidence beliefs. Christianity has always been about force-feeding growing humans to believe in never-evidenced concepts. An invisible man in the sky created everything and diversity is strength.)
If you are stupid and think there should be no new taxes, then this bad bloke is coming for you. People trying to educate kids in such kwazy ways might cause a few more Lee Harvey Oswalds to visit so tax cattle I mean good citizens of the Usican part of the Good New World Order get rid of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of Usica.
Ists demonstrate by their O.C.W. behavior how inconsistent they are! They say that capitalism, like democracy, is a fine theory. Under capitalism, the work product of humanity is served best by permitting humans to invest capital in products which they think will most profit them, thereby everyone is bettered, the wise investor foremost. A worker thus might invest his weekly hours in exchange for a wage.
Ists remind that like the congenitally wealthy claiming that Daddy’s money had nothing to do with their own financial success, Earthlings claiming random mutation is extremely narcissistic and entitled. “Oh, everyone could have gotten into the best prep school and the best college. And gotten the best internships and callbacks and jobs and investment opportunities.” Earthlings’ recurrent fascination with expressing the completely fair set of “coincidences” which benefited them, whether “Sky Daddy picked me being here because He loved me” or “it was random luck” is just as pigheaded. The idiocy of clinging to such explanations is the same.
In actuality, those Ists argue, any human economy provides opportunities for the evil powerful and/or excessively greedy powerful to place mandatory tithes or restrictions. These can be placed on how capital may be invested, permitting third parties to skim profits from ventures in which they had no part. Such strategies may run the gamut from mild to very intrusive. For example, forcing everyone to pay annual fees that go into a development fund controlled by local kingpins.
(E.g., a “business license” fee, the profits from which feed into a government advertising and regulation fund controlled by local strongmen who move into politics with age [and then retire with more age; duh] after their forebears have tweaked the market to ensure they succeed. Ists say that U.S. citizens are supposed to imagine that such businessmen are subject to restrictions far too cleverly written to use their regulatory positions to permit them to boost the careers of their offspring. But when citizens do that, it is not fake, it is real! Ists are so dumb and so wrong and did Jesina mention they don’t like evolution too?)
The evil powerful may make it so one is only permitted to trade in products sold by wealthy insiders, with publicly funded armed soldiers preventing other transactions. E.g., a “pharmacy” selling drugs at an incredibly inflated rate, while mandatory taxes fund a force of armed men who attack and imprison/kill those who attempt to sell those products at different rates. Consider the way the U.S.A. uses taxes to fund various paramilitary forces, prime among them the D.E.A., to control territory via armored vehicles, helicopters, and fully automatic weapons. The purchase of $13/dose x 30 doses (mostly covered by insurance if you're insured and buying pills) made for 10 cents/dose in rural India is thus effected, in conjunction with politicians disseminating “moral” justifications which are neither internally nor externally consistent.
As with the financial foundations of men considered great businessmen, how some people become incredibly rich is ascribed to random luck. The use of “it was random” is a deceit meant often to hide the theft that happened or that it happened from the terrain created by forefathers. The automatic weapons, etc. purchased for the D.E.A. are purchased by the taxes levied upon the commoners, who are later implied to be the less able businesspeople. It is like the way that the respectable noble houses of Europe were based upon who would most reliably sell out the people there to foreign invaders. People who wanted to protect their families from foreign invaders were killed, and they are still remembered as barbarians and/or pagan heretics. By contrast, people who were willing to have some families butchered, and the others enslaved to foreigners, were given 30,000 acres of land and called “noble.” The nexus of much modern wealth is this: like the more recently known fortunes, the media claims that randomness combined with business acumen achieved a notable result. That notable result was actually the payoff/consolidation of the investment of stolen resources. I.e. like in CE2003 Iraq, Christianization caused “the commoners” to have to pay and die for a venture which would create wealth they were not to have. In CE2050, rich kids will go to expensive prep schools and fancy universities before getting great jobs at a family friend’s company, all because of the control over the sales in the CE2003 Iraq War (A company that manages military contracts and oil sales is easy to figure out, but there might be a new resource that comes from that war and makes people rich for different reasons). Meanwhile, the descendants of the people who died or risked their lives fighting that war will not go to nice prep schools, nor fancy universities, will not get fancy jobs, etc. The effects of that foul war will be with humans on Earth for a long time. History can be written to later claim that “the commoners” were stupid people who demanded the “salvation” offered by N.A.T.O. forces—that they wanted the war. The people of the “united” kingdom and states, of course, wanted the war just as much as did the people of France, but history can be written to show that they wanted it.
(It can seem impossible, because you can see now how very much a great supermajority of people don't want whatever autodestructive policy to happen--however, in a lot of years, smart kids might take it for granted that most people in the West wanted mass immigration. Crazy? Impossible? Well, why did you get taught that Europeans all started worshiping this official wise man from the roaming tribes of the southern deserts? Well, because they liked the idea so much, of course!
...See? Incredibly obtuse, unlikely things have become quite real before. If Westerners' descendants still exist, it'd just be another repeat.)
Like the early Christian wars, the official history can say the commoners were wanting various trying things because of something stupid, like how best to be an egalitarian who demanded proper worship of a Middle Eastern man. The true history is far too frightening for most people to contemplate. The countries which participated in attacking Iraq were not being controlled by popular opinion, but murderous cabals of completely non-democratic people: Christians (no, not Jesusian ones; Bangist ones. If you prefer thinking of Jesusians, there's always Dumbya). History, and other endeavors (academic fields), are controlled by these same cabals, which makes all current perspectives—such as how Europe was Christianized, how everything began, and so forth—illuminated to show a shape that frightens most people too much. “No mommy, shut the curtain to make the monster go away!” squeals the frightened child, believing/hoping that not seeing the scary thing means it doesn’t really exist.
Think of the way that the commoners were most often victimized in the Russian and French Revolutions, but how many officially smart people said and still say those “revolutions” were done by the common people in the interests of the common people.
This kind of blind stupidity is like the fascination Earthly humans have with the idiotic “rugged, independent cowboy” story of evolution by random mutation. The environment in which creatures evolve compels evolution to happen; there is nothing rugged or independent about it. Like a rich kid believing it is her or his economic savvy and business acumen which led to financial success, the currently favored story of evolution is a narcissistic delusion.
As publicly funded armies can engage in wars that benefit a minority while harming a majority and then have official histories written up about how the majority insisted it happen that way, control of human governments is a profound gain. The soldier who dies in what Ists call an “unnecessary” war (cherish I mean perish the thought!) is of course harmed; so too is the common person taxed to pay for that unnecessary war.
Of course Ists say that the common person taxed to pay for that is a model very like the way that people are taxed to pay for the creation of other things at which they are supposed to marvel. Think of the way that taxes funded the public libraries whose orders created sensations in book sales, the way that lower income families served/died in the wars that established resource-ownership fortunes, and so forth. The use of public money to invest to create private fortunes is common. The history of great fortune, like that of aristocracy, is a deceptive description of theft. The illusion of “great skill at picking what to manufacture” is regularly employed.
Ists go so far as to define child labor laws and general taxes also as examples. A child labor law may prevent future investors/savers from accumulating capital, and may be a moral good depending on other circumstances. Avaricious people of low moral character (“greedy jerks”) may have developed habits of wrongly exploiting children, and society may be incapable of redressing this without still allowing savvier children and employers partner for a lower time preference benefit. E.g., children who handily complete schoolwork they find simplistic and easy may not devote the extra hours to keeping someone’s books in order to build personal financial success. As a result, the smarter student may sit there for hours doodling and thinking that school sucks, while the less intelligent but richer student is generating interest.
In a climate of freedom, a schoolgirl might finish her homework very early and then choose between hours of ideleness or earning a few bucks. The popular image of children saved by government from losing hands inside cruel machines is marketing. Children smoothing out the arrangement of small products on shelves and helping customers locate product in retail outlets (a job where one faces things and helps people find stuff) need no government protection. The image of the powers that be saving people from things that aren’t really bad is like what was used in crafting the stories about the Russian and French “revolutions.”
Ists, just liking conspiracy theories for some reason, say that modern child labor laws have gained credit for labor changes that were happening anyway. I.e. if machines become much safer over 100 years and maim/kill far fewer or no people near those machines, it is not because government did a wonderful job making labor laws, but it can be presented that way. By the same token, if Christianity infects a society, and then after a thousand years or so space shuttles are invented, the invention was not because of Christianity. It’s like if you like dinner the night of the day you notice that weird thing on your foot—weird things on feet do not cook. General taxes may fund the investments of some slovenly legislators, providing them massive profits at the expense of others. The process as it exists on the 21st century C.E. Earth is a moral bad given how often this investment has been in the form of warfare.
Consider that it was the same type of person who owned the factory in which it was dangerous to work many years ago, and that that person’s children then became government reformers who disallowed other legal minors to work at safe jobs. In both cases, the same set of genes benefited at the expense of everyone else.
Bangist Christianity, with its random mutation is, Ists say, designed around the market myths of the late 1800s. They would say that, those istiots, because they say that Jesusian Christianity was designed for the new urban impersonality in developing Europe in the early A.D. That’s a stupid idea, though, since religions don’t get “designed” for things, but are divinely inspired. Whoops, it’s, just…random! Random!
Comments
Post a Comment